C0bR wrote:Wembanyama is actually greatly overrated defensively. Sure if you drive right into him you will get blocked but put him into any sort of action and he gets cooked which is the primary reason behind the Spurs' disappointing defense this season.
His overall rim protection numbers are just pretty good (the block numbers suggest block chasing which is confirmed by the eye test) and he can only play drop so he gets cooked by any higher tier guards. His IQ and effort are very low.
Holmgren is essentially way better at every aspect of defense other than pure shotblocking (blockchasing) and rebounding.
No. You're taking it too far.
The Spurs defend like a top 10 defense with Wemby on the floor, and like a bottom 5 defense with him off the floor. Calling him and part of "the primary reason behind the Spurs' disappointing defense this season" is ridiculous. The Spurs aren't even that disapointing on defense, unless you're talking about your personal expectations. They're average. What did you expect them to be?
Wemby still makes mistakes, but neither his IQ or effort are low. I watch him and think his motor and focus level are obviously high.
I also strongly disagree that Wemby has less defensive versatility than Chet. Wemby is way more disruptive in perimeter situations than Chet. His hustle and deflection stats blow Chet's out of the water.
We're talking about two of the best young defensive players in the NBA. Any take that either of them are bad isn't analysis that I can take seriously.