Lalouie wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Dyslexic me read the title as Lamelo Numbers by the balls
i thought it was lamelo has numerous balls
Lmao I actually read it the same way
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Lalouie wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Dyslexic me read the title as Lamelo Numbers by the balls
i thought it was lamelo has numerous balls
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20

Ambrose wrote:cupcakesnake wrote:Lamelo Ball has crazy rare playmaking ability. Super creative, super risky. He's one of the only players who regularly does things that I've never seen before. He's also a decent shooter- or would be- with better shot selection.
He is tough to evaluate in his context. It's a team is injured, and full of inefficient score-first types who don't play defense. With someone like Lamelo, you like him having offensive freedom, but not to this extent where he's often tasked with just doing whatever to produce a shot.
I get the temptation to write Lamelo off as a talented player who isn't really serious enough to be a real competitor or difference maker. I'd like to see him at least once in a more normal basketball environment before I feel like that evaluation has weight. What would he look like if you put him on Houston, or Minnesota. Teams with defense that could really use an aggressive playmaker? I hope we'll get to know.
Everyone is currently singing Cade Cunningham's praises and crapping on Lamelo, but swap those two and I'm not sure much changes for either of their teams (Cade is a way better defender, Lamelo is the superior playmaker).
This reads as insane to me.
Cade came into the league a year after, to a worse situation, is far more durable, and is already winning more with a group that no one in the world would consider good. Oh, and he's a straight up better player. Like they aren't even on the same tier.

cupcakesnake wrote:Ambrose wrote:cupcakesnake wrote:Lamelo Ball has crazy rare playmaking ability. Super creative, super risky. He's one of the only players who regularly does things that I've never seen before. He's also a decent shooter- or would be- with better shot selection.
He is tough to evaluate in his context. It's a team is injured, and full of inefficient score-first types who don't play defense. With someone like Lamelo, you like him having offensive freedom, but not to this extent where he's often tasked with just doing whatever to produce a shot.
I get the temptation to write Lamelo off as a talented player who isn't really serious enough to be a real competitor or difference maker. I'd like to see him at least once in a more normal basketball environment before I feel like that evaluation has weight. What would he look like if you put him on Houston, or Minnesota. Teams with defense that could really use an aggressive playmaker? I hope we'll get to know.
Everyone is currently singing Cade Cunningham's praises and crapping on Lamelo, but swap those two and I'm not sure much changes for either of their teams (Cade is a way better defender, Lamelo is the superior playmaker).
This reads as insane to me.
Cade came into the league a year after, to a worse situation, is far more durable, and is already winning more with a group that no one in the world would consider good. Oh, and he's a straight up better player. Like they aren't even on the same tier.
Far more durable is a stretch. This is the first season we aren't worried about Cade's health. He had injury problems in each of his first 3 seasons. I agree Melo is worse here. I'd agree Melo's health has been worse lately and is more of a legit concern at this point.
Detroit actually is a functional roster this year though. Certainly not supremely talented, but very functional. Good health this year, especially amongst the vets. Tons of shooters to space for Cade drives, a nice lob threat to play pick & roll with, no more 2-center lineups with zero spacing. Really good athletes running in transition. Charlotte is simply an injured mess.
Functionally, there's not a huge difference on offense to me. Both players get massive usage. Neither are efficient with their shooting possessions (55% vs 54% ts), both are walking turnover problems (but Cade is worse). Cade is stronger on drives with a nicer midrange pull game. Melo is more dangerous from 3, though you'd like to see him improve the selection. Neither of them are efficient interior scorers, but Cade is nicer in the short midrange.
I like Cade's defense way more, so I'd pick Cade. But you're going off vibes if you think Cade is on some other level offensively. He's just in a better situation for himself and healthier. I think Lamelo has a higher ceiling than Cade offensively, but I mostly doubt he reaches that ceiling and like Cade's floor way way more.
~Regarding Denver Nuggets, May 2025hardenASG13 wrote:They are better than the teammates of SGA, Giannis, Luka, Brunson, Curry etc. so far.

SeattleJazzFan wrote:he needs to stop shooting so much. period. when you are that inefficient, you need to decrease your attempts and be more selective with your shooting. especially when you are as skilled passing the ball as lamelo. he has an opportunity to lift teammates and make people better, but instead he'd rather jack up a bunch of garbage all the time.
tsherkin wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:he needs to stop shooting so much. period. when you are that inefficient, you need to decrease your attempts and be more selective with your shooting. especially when you are as skilled passing the ball as lamelo. he has an opportunity to lift teammates and make people better, but instead he'd rather jack up a bunch of garbage all the time.
To whom should he pass it who will score more efficiently?

tamaraw08 wrote:Seth Curry with a TS% of 61%
Josh Green 57TS%
Diabate 60TS%
Mark Williams 62TS%
For me, it's not just shooting and lack of passing but that crazy 3pt Attempt rate of almost 53% with a low 33.3% and a low 23.7FT rate.
Trae Young has lower 3PT rate of 49% but a higher FTR OF 40%
Garland has a lower 3PT rate of under 45%
tamaraw08 wrote:tsherkin wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:he needs to stop shooting so much. period. when you are that inefficient, you need to decrease your attempts and be more selective with your shooting. especially when you are as skilled passing the ball as lamelo. he has an opportunity to lift teammates and make people better, but instead he'd rather jack up a bunch of garbage all the time.
To whom should he pass it who will score more efficiently?
Seth Curry with a TS% of 61%
Josh Green 57TS%
Diabate 60TS%
Mark Williams 62TS%
For me, it's not just shooting and lack of passing but that crazy 3pt Attempt rate of almost 53% with a low 33.3% and a low 23.7FT rate.
Trae Young has lower 3PT rate of 49% but a higher FTR OF 40%
Garland has a lower 3PT rate of under 45%
EmpireFalls wrote:tamaraw08 wrote:tsherkin wrote:
To whom should he pass it who will score more efficiently?
Seth Curry with a TS% of 61%
Josh Green 57TS%
Diabate 60TS%
Mark Williams 62TS%
For me, it's not just shooting and lack of passing but that crazy 3pt Attempt rate of almost 53% with a low 33.3% and a low 23.7FT rate.
Trae Young has lower 3PT rate of 49% but a higher FTR OF 40%
Garland has a lower 3PT rate of under 45%
This is cracking me up. Have you ever watched a single Hornets game? The first two are purely spot up shooters who can basically score only one way - spot up 3s created by someone else. Josh Green especially is a hilarious player who can basically only hit corner 3s. Who’s creating those shots? Thats right, LaMelo.
Diabate and Mark are bigs who have no shooting range or post game whatsoever and basically only score off rolls or rebounds. Again, who creates their shots? LaMelo.
Btw, something that your purely statistical analysis discounts is that LaMelo often gets to the rim and misses for Mark to clean it up. So it goes down as a missed shot but the action is created by LaMelo, and effectively functions as an assist. It’s something that you’d have to watch a game to realize… but you’ve proven beyond any doubt that you don’t have any interest in that.


tamaraw08 wrote:Someone on this thread mentioned and compared Lamelo to Cade Cunningham.
Cade recognized that he is a bad shooter
Beasley is lighting it up this season but let me ask you this, who is shooting better from 3pt area, him or Seth Curry?
DING DING DING!!!! Curry at 45.7%
PER 100 possessions for 3pt attempts,
Cade only shoots 8.7 as compared to Lamelo's 17.7 at a low 33.3%
Beasley is taking 16.5 attempts as compared to Curry at only 9 attempts.![]()
Josh Green who is averaging 40% is only taking 6.2 attempts!!!
So Lamelo's 2 best 3pt shooters are only combining 15.2 3pt shots while the freaking DESIGNATED POINT GUARD SHAMELESSLY takes 17.7 at a low 33.3 accuracy
tsherkin wrote:tamaraw08 wrote:Someone on this thread mentioned and compared Lamelo to Cade Cunningham.
Cade recognized that he is a bad shooter
What?
No. Cade isn't a bad shooter; shooting is his STRENGTH. He isn't an efficient scorer, but that's a separate situation.Beasley is lighting it up this season but let me ask you this, who is shooting better from 3pt area, him or Seth Curry?
DING DING DING!!!! Curry at 45.7%
PER 100 possessions for 3pt attempts,
Cade only shoots 8.7 as compared to Lamelo's 17.7 at a low 33.3%
Beasley is taking 16.5 attempts as compared to Curry at only 9 attempts.![]()
Josh Green who is averaging 40% is only taking 6.2 attempts!!!
So Lamelo's 2 best 3pt shooters are only combining 15.2 3pt shots while the freaking DESIGNATED POINT GUARD SHAMELESSLY takes 17.7 at a low 33.3 accuracy
So, Ball is taking 11.6 3PAg not 17.7.
And yeah, most of those guys are taking spot-up shots. Those need to be set up by other action. They don't just appear out of no where, raining out of the sky like manna from heaven.
And you know what's crazy? Ball is shooting MORE 3' than ATG shooter Steph Curry. 
tamaraw08 wrote:Ball is taking 11.6 3pt attempts per game but I based my numbers on per 100 possessions.
tsherkin wrote:tamaraw08 wrote:Ball is taking 11.6 3pt attempts per game but I based my numbers on per 100 possessions.
Why?
Anyway, yes. We know he's bombing too much from 3, but like I said, you can't just magically replace those shots with better shots for other players. There's some room for improvement, but I think you're not appreciating that being surrounded by guys who don't score well for themselves still means that Ball needs to set up those shots himself. And that's high-energy stuff in volume over a game.

tamaraw08 wrote:For me it's a mindset of these players to decide what is best for the team's offense.
The freaking 40 year old Lebron dealing with foot and ankle issues, is hitting his 2nd highest 3pt% of his 22 year career and yet is not launching 11 3's per game.
And it's not just James, but also older guys like CP3, James Harden and younger players like Trae Young,
And yes, it's possible that right now, they are tanking hard so no one including their coach cares but Lamelo has been doing this crap since Oct. For November alone with both Grant and Miller healthy, Ball shot more than 13 3pt attempts/game.
GiggitySmalls wrote:As a Hornets fan, if we land flagg i don't want Melo anywhere near him. Trade him. Trade miles aswell. Move on from the loser anchors. Melo is empty calories stats, and lacks a significant amount of Grey matter between the ears.
Sent from my SM-S936U using RealGM mobile app
Pacernation wrote:When he streamed a video smoking weed before a playin game and then stunk it up, that told me all I need to know about the guy. Sure he's talented, but he doesn't take this seriously and to be quiet honest, I think he doesn't have the intelligence to see what's wrong with his game. No defense, injury prone, lazy, low IQ chucker that want's to be a social media darling instead of a winning basketballplayer. Hornets should trade him for whatever return they get asap and build around this years pick and miller. You won't go anywhere with this kind of "point guard" play.