ImageImageImageImage

Paolo for…?

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,568
And1: 8,517
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#61 » by Skybox » Mon Mar 3, 2025 9:42 pm

Knightro wrote:I don't think the Rockets would trade Amen for Paolo straight up...


He’s been scorching suddenly…with more to come I think. Would be an especially nasty combo with Suggs. I think Paolo has way more superstar ceiling but Amen really feels like a winner too. I’d want a lot more to balance though. Scoring is super important, imo, when you get to the upper echelon of players. The iso scoring is so big in the playoffs when things break down, but awful if it’s all you’ve got all season.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,568
And1: 8,517
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#62 » by Skybox » Mon Mar 3, 2025 10:12 pm

HOU sends: Amen, Reed Sheperd, Jalen Green, Tari Eason
HOU gets: Paolo, Cole, KCP

ORL sends: Paolo, Cole, KCP
ORL gets: Amen, Cam Johnson, Reed Sheperd, Eason, BRK 27 frp(top 5)

BRK sends: Cam Johnson, 27 frp(top 5)
BRK gets: Jalen Green, Jett Howard

Goga, Steven Adams (MLE), Moe
Cam Johnson, TJD, Isaac
Franz, Eason, Isaac
Suggs, Hield, Sheperd
Amen, AB

*ORL could do a lot more with two frps to, perhaps, move off WCJ or Isaac, perhaps add another shooter…

ORL sends WCJ, DEN frp
GSW sends: Buddy Hield, Trayce Jackson-Davis

LOTS of everything, younger, still great defensively with much added shooting, much deeper better bench, allowing Franz to be the offensive hub. Consider trading ORL 25 frp for future frp(s) as we’ll be very young, very deep, and very confused for a bit…or just draft BPA for depth/development
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,756
And1: 11,238
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#63 » by KillMonger » Mon Mar 3, 2025 10:55 pm

eyriq wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=Xyk0oAr_KZezTxrJsXuvfA&s=19

Damn, just realized she validated the "Paolo wants a table setter" narrative. The front office is officially on notice.
Paolo himself said we need a PG last season iirc..... And the front office proceeded to do nothing..... So it's honestly understandable to be frustrated when you can see the issue, address it publicly then watch the front office rebuff you.... Then the problems on the court starts partly because of issue the star player addressed that didn't get fulfilled

Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
Image
User avatar
Last Guardian
RealGM
Posts: 27,287
And1: 4,362
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Location: New Jersey
 

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#64 » by Last Guardian » Mon Mar 3, 2025 11:08 pm

Skybox wrote:
Last Guardian wrote:Kessler and Markannen. Replace Paolo with an arguably a better offensive player and no worse a defender, and give us a true elite rim protector and rebounder.



I wouldn’t, but thanks for reading the OP… Maybe with a significant frp this summer or next coming back. That is an interesting combo with Franz & Suggs.


I’d consider it…but ultimately probably wouldn’t move the needle much.

I’m fine with trying to be an elite defense with decent enough offense. Can do that with Paolo but would need some real upgrades at several positions
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,957
And1: 14,284
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#65 » by JRoy » Mon Mar 3, 2025 11:12 pm

Skybox wrote:HOU sends: Amen, Reed Sheperd, Jalen Green, Tari Eason
HOU gets: Paolo, Cole, KCP

ORL sends: Paolo, Cole, KCP
ORL gets: Amen, Cam Johnson, Reed Sheperd, Eason, BRK 27 frp(top 5)

BRK sends: Cam Johnson, 27 frp(top 5)
BRK gets: Jalen Green, Jett Howard

Goga, Steven Adams (MLE), Moe
Cam Johnson, TJD, Isaac
Franz, Eason, Isaac
Suggs, Hield, Sheperd
Amen, AB

*ORL could do a lot more with two frps to, perhaps, move off WCJ or Isaac, perhaps add another shooter…

ORL sends WCJ, DEN frp
GSW sends: Buddy Hield, Trayce Jackson-Davis

LOTS of everything, younger, still great defensively with much added shooting, much deeper better bench, allowing Franz to be the offensive hub. Consider trading ORL 25 frp for future frp(s) as we’ll be very young, very deep, and very confused for a bit…or just draft BPA for depth/development


HOU should not take that deal.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
anothermagicfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 829
And1: 346
Joined: Dec 28, 2016
       

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#66 » by anothermagicfan » Tue Mar 4, 2025 12:59 am

Markkenan is an ideal center for Orlando with Paolo and Franz on the offense. He's not much of a rim defender but he would pull the opposing center out of the paint because he's a high volume 3 point threat. Opposing teams pack the paint against the magic. It's one thing to pack the paint with the help coming from guards versus packing the paint with a big when Paolo or Franz drives. Is Markkenans contract affordable and can we depend on him? What would we have to give up to get him cause that interior defense is not strong so we would need Suggs/KCP or AB on the perimeter to be on the attacking gaurds
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,756
And1: 11,238
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#67 » by KillMonger » Tue Mar 4, 2025 3:23 am

anothermagicfan wrote:Markkenan is an ideal center for Orlando with Paolo and Franz on the offense. He's not much of a rim defender but he would pull the opposing center out of the paint because he's a high volume 3 point threat. Opposing teams pack the paint against the magic. It's one thing to pack the paint with the help coming from guards versus packing the paint with a big when Paolo or Franz drives. Is Markkenans contract affordable and can we depend on him? What would we have to give up to get him cause that interior defense is not strong so we would need Suggs/KCP or AB on the perimeter to be on the attacking gaurds
The ideal would be a center like porzingis, can stretch the floor and protect the rim.....those don't grow on trees though

Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
Image
IllMagic04
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,836
And1: 1,875
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Location: Baltimore MD
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#68 » by IllMagic04 » Tue Mar 4, 2025 3:30 am

JRoy wrote:
Skybox wrote:HOU sends: Amen, Reed Sheperd, Jalen Green, Tari Eason
HOU gets: Paolo, Cole, KCP

ORL sends: Paolo, Cole, KCP
ORL gets: Amen, Cam Johnson, Reed Sheperd, Eason, BRK 27 frp(top 5)

BRK sends: Cam Johnson, 27 frp(top 5)
BRK gets: Jalen Green, Jett Howard

Goga, Steven Adams (MLE), Moe
Cam Johnson, TJD, Isaac
Franz, Eason, Isaac
Suggs, Hield, Sheperd
Amen, AB

*ORL could do a lot more with two frps to, perhaps, move off WCJ or Isaac, perhaps add another shooter…

ORL sends WCJ, DEN frp
GSW sends: Buddy Hield, Trayce Jackson-Davis

LOTS of everything, younger, still great defensively with much added shooting, much deeper better bench, allowing Franz to be the offensive hub. Consider trading ORL 25 frp for future frp(s) as we’ll be very young, very deep, and very confused for a bit…or just draft BPA for depth/development


HOU should not take that deal.

Neither should we


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,232
And1: 8,966
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#69 » by drsd » Tue Mar 4, 2025 7:47 am

Skybox wrote:
drsd wrote:I think Banchero for Trae Young .


Suggs + KCP + picks more likely, imo.


No team can carry three max players in the new CBA, which is why, although your trade is permissible "now", it cannot happen.

Getting a PG that everyone here seems to want WILL cost either Banchero or F-Wagner. That's why the PGs the Magic should think of, after dumping Caldwell-Pope, are Alex Caruso/Payton Pritchard/Collin Sexton/Bones Hyland - type players.

For better or for worse, this team's future is linked to the ability to create a novel offense, not currently used in the NBA, built around two forwards taking terms on-ball. My problem: Coach Mosley is not an offensive innovator. Thus: he needs to fire his offensive coordinator and bring in a creative mind to invent the new NBA. If he doesn't do that, Mosley will be fired in two years time.

By the way, there is precedent here on this. When management brought in Rashard Lewis to the 2007-08 team, Orlando invented 4 out 1 in. (which GSW used to win a truck of titles). That novel offense was not created by Stan Van Gundy, a sternly defensive-focussed coach not unlike Mosley. This novel offense was created by Van Gundy's team.

There is a recent NBA title that had this basic two-forwards structure: the 2019-20 Los Angeles Lakers.
Avery Bradley/Danny Green/LeBron James/Anthony Davis/JaVale McGee
That is very similar to the path the Magic look to be taking in their "window". Of course the skill set of Banchero and F-Wager are NOTHING like James and Davis. So: innovate!
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,357
And1: 19,452
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#70 » by pepe1991 » Tue Mar 4, 2025 9:27 am

drsd wrote:
Skybox wrote:
drsd wrote:I think Banchero for Trae Young .


Suggs + KCP + picks more likely, imo.


No team can carry three max players in the new CBA, which is why, although your trade is permissible "now", it cannot happen.

Getting a PG that everyone here seems to want WILL cost either Banchero or F-Wagner. That's why the PGs the Magic should think of, after dumping Caldwell-Pope, are Alex Caruso/Payton Pritchard/Collin Sexton/Bones Hyland - type players.

For better or for worse, this team's future is linked to the ability to create a novel offense, not currently used in the NBA, built around two forwards taking terms on-ball. My problem: Coach Mosley is not an offensive innovator. Thus: he needs to fire his offensive coordinator and bring in a creative mind to invent the new NBA. If he doesn't do that, Mosley will be fired in two years time.

By the way, there is precedent here on this. When management brought in Rashard Lewis to the 2007-08 team, Orlando invented 4 out 1 in. (which GSW used to win a truck of titles). That novel offense was not created by Stan Van Gundy, a sternly defensive-focussed coach not unlike Mosley. This novel offense was created by Van Gundy's team.

There is a recent NBA title that had this basic two-forwards structure: the 2019-20 Los Angeles Lakers.
Avery Bradley/Danny Green/LeBron James/Anthony Davis/JaVale McGee
That is very similar to the path the Magic look to be taking in their "window". Of course the skill set of Banchero and F-Wager are NOTHING like James and Davis. So: innovate!



NBA has history of being slowest developing league among all basketball leagues when it comes to adjustments. NBA has ugly history of being copy-cat league of other successful nba teams, so most teams just build (worst) versions of current championship contending teams and that's one of reasons why most of them fail.

Teams all around a globe were in 3 point era 20 years before NBA.
All it took is raise of Steph Curry, multiple officiating changes, Malice at the Palace, and brutal decline in tv ratings to finally step out of mid 2000s mid range shooting era, the ugliest basketball nba era ever.

Like, there is literally story how HOF Mirko Novosel told people in his club and national team in 1980 to paint 3 point line so his players can start practicing 3 point shots, despite fact 3 point shot won't become a thing in Europe for 4 more years ( and among players he prepared for 3 point shooting was non other than Dražen Petrović himself)
"Why shoot 2 when you can step back and take 3"

That's Petrović NBA qoute from 1992.


Our GM, Anthony Parker, back in 2004 / 2005 was back to back Euroleague champion as player with Maccabi.

Maccabi was very unique team. For start, Parker played 3 different positions, SG,SF and PF. Backbone of his team were:
Šarūnas Jasikevičius- floor general who was elite 3 point shooter
Nikola Vujcic- point center, first Euroleague player with triple double who was 3 point shooter.


Few years ago there was huge debate here how "centers are history" and i was strong opponent of such claim, once again, all it took was watching other leagues and knowing as long target hangs in air, being tallest person will be massive advantage. All you needed is different skillsets for modern basketball to seek among Cs to be better suited for modern era.


Back to Orlando. Yes, there is a way to make Franz and Paolo be part of the offense where both players are involved and contribute and help team have good offensive rating. But that way isn't iso basketball. It should be pretty much opposite of that. Zero iso-basketball. Magic should be running variations of motion offense. There should be way more action where Franz is ball handler, Paolo is screener, there should be whole lot more offense where Paolo is ball handler and smaller guard is a screner who can curl to 3 point shot ( KCP for example) ,there should be way more plays where one of Franz/Paolo rush transition to take position below rim where they can use fact they are 6'10 , often guarded by smaller players.
There is NO logical explanation why so young team plays so slow.
There is no reason why every single offensive set we waste 10 sec on doing fake hand-offs that lead to nothing. There is zero reasons why one of Franz/Paolo don't clear side and attack people off the dribble 1 on 1. They send double team? Good, it means other side is playing 3 v 4, in a single second somebody goes to help, cutter should already be below rim. Good luck defending it.


I'll just post video of Maccabi 2004 team and pay attention how their offense is runned. It's modern nba basketball- 21 years before modern nba basketball.
It really hurts my mind that we have GM who played in that team, yet who has no voice ( or decision power) to implement anything from team that he was literally part of.
Around 7:00 you have Anthony Parker segment and how team was setting offense to prevent any other team to throw double team at him, opening driving lines and spreading floor
Around 8:00 min mark you have amazing examples how to use post ups to create shots from perimeter by doing inverted stagger screen before ball even leaves passing hand. ( pretty much Nikola Jokić basketball, 20 years before Nikola Jokić basketball ).



To add some solutions, my off season would be going after some of this:
1) Nembhard+ Toppin ( for KCP and whatever Pacers want ) .
Reasons: Nembhard is talented, can shoot, isn't high usage guy, takes his spots, can play off ball. Toppin as energy guy who plays off ball, start or play off bench, doesn't really matter, key factor for him is his ability to play without ball.
2) Gafford. Rebounding, some shot blocking, playing above rim, giving option to throw pick&roll lobs , can patch on defense what gaurds miss due his mobility.
3) Austin Reaves - Lakers probably need s*** loud of defense and C, feel free to pick whoever

other high targets would be Prichard, White, CJ McCullum, Simons, Reid, Brook Lopez, Adebayo

Basically i would target either guards who can break first line of defense, guards who can shoot or Cs who bring lot of energy and are mobile OR C who is very smart and decision maker.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,232
And1: 8,966
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#71 » by drsd » Tue Mar 4, 2025 11:55 am

pepe1991 wrote:NBA has history of being slowest developing league among all basketball leagues when it comes to adjustments. NBA has ugly history of being copy-cat league of other successful nba teams, so most teams just build (worst) versions of current championship contending teams and that's one of reasons why most of them fail.


I agree with every pixel of your post, and want to focus on this.


Yes, there is a way to make Franz and Paolo be part of the offense where both players are involved and contribute and help team have good offensive rating. But that way isn't iso basketball. It should be pretty much opposite of that. Zero iso-basketball. Magic should be running variations of motion offense. There should be way more action where Franz is ball handler, Paolo is screener, there should be whole lot more offense where Paolo is ball handler and smaller guard is a screner who can curl to 3 point shot ( KCP for example) ,there should be way more plays where one of Franz/Paolo rush transition to take position below rim where they can use fact they are 6'10 , often guarded by smaller players.


And you just innovated on the forward-to-forward pick and roll!
See: it's easy.

In the same way that the Bulls used a SG / SF pair to run an offense, their PG and PF were just shooters only. That is what Orlando will need from both guards: one in one corner and the other in the other, as outlet kickouts for three-pointers.
Orlando's future cannot plausible involve a guard running the offense. If winning is the goal, at least.

But it also cannot and must not involve any iso-play; outside of inbound plays and late game scenarios. Which leads me to ...



There is NO logical explanation why so young team plays so slow.


I am also disgusted by this. You have talked about "wasting shot clock." Which I agree to.
And additionally, as Orlando is a very good rebounding team, I am shocked that the fast break is not a set play for this team.
Orlando can run a "Showtime" style Lakers team of the 80s effectively (Bitadze even looks a bit like Kurt Rambis these days!). So do it. It looks cool and is a high efficiency play.

Especially when Anthony steals a big's defensive rebound (to stat-pad his rebounding numbers). He is literally in a position to start a fast break at that moment.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,568
And1: 8,517
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#72 » by Skybox » Tue Mar 4, 2025 12:17 pm

anothermagicfan wrote:Markkenan is an ideal center for Orlando with Paolo and Franz on the offense. He's not much of a rim defender but he would pull the opposing center out of the paint because he's a high volume 3 point threat. Opposing teams pack the paint against the magic. It's one thing to pack the paint with the help coming from guards versus packing the paint with a big when Paolo or Franz drives. Is Markkenans contract affordable and can we depend on him? What would we have to give up to get him cause that interior defense is not strong so we would need Suggs/KCP or AB on the perimeter to be on the attacking gaurds


He’s the farthest thing from a rim defender and pretty far from a Center in reality. He might be a better fit at PF (than Paolo- since this is a trade Paolo thread) next to Franz, but he’ll never be close to a passable C unless you’ve got an Isaac or JJJ or AD at “PF”…Paolo’s not that guy to play PF next to Lauri.

Perhaps, to build on earlier idea…
ORL sends: Paolo, KCP, WCJ, Cole, DEN 25 frp (top 5)
UTA sends: Lauri, Kessler, Sexton, LAL 27 frp (top 4)

Kessler, Goga, Moe
Lauri, Isaac
Franz, TdS
Suggs, Jett, frp?
Sexton, AB
three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,999
And1: 627
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#73 » by three3d » Tue Mar 4, 2025 1:30 pm

And you just innovated on the forward-to-forward pick and roll!
See: it's easy.

In the same way that the Bulls used a SG / SF pair to run an offense, their PG and PF were just shooters only. That is what Orlando will need from both guards: one in one corner and the other in the other, as outlet kickouts for three-pointers.
Orlando's future cannot plausible involve a guard running the offense. If winning is the goal, at least.

But it also cannot and must not involve any iso-play; outside of inbound plays and late game scenarios. Which leads me to ...



There is NO logical explanation why so young team plays so slow.


:clap: THE TRIANGLE OFFENSE would be beautiful with Franz and Paolo and Simons
anothermagicfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 829
And1: 346
Joined: Dec 28, 2016
       

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#74 » by anothermagicfan » Tue Mar 4, 2025 9:50 pm

Skybox wrote:
anothermagicfan wrote:Markkenan is an ideal center for Orlando with Paolo and Franz on the offense. He's not much of a rim defender but he would pull the opposing center out of the paint because he's a high volume 3 point threat. Opposing teams pack the paint against the magic. It's one thing to pack the paint with the help coming from guards versus packing the paint with a big when Paolo or Franz drives. Is Markkenans contract affordable and can we depend on him? What would we have to give up to get him cause that interior defense is not strong so we would need Suggs/KCP or AB on the perimeter to be on the attacking gaurds


He’s the farthest thing from a rim defender and pretty far from a Center in reality. He might be a better fit at PF (than Paolo- since this is a trade Paolo thread) next to Franz, but he’ll never be close to a passable C unless you’ve got an Isaac or JJJ or AD at “PF”…Paolo’s not that guy to play PF next to Lauri.

Perhaps, to build on earlier idea…
ORL sends: Paolo, KCP, WCJ, Cole, DEN 25 frp (top 5)
UTA sends: Lauri, Kessler, Sexton, LAL 27 frp (top 4)

Kessler, Goga, Moe
Lauri, Isaac
Franz, TdS
Suggs, Jett, frp?
Sexton, AB



I really was talking only about him being an ideal fit on offense. His contract is way out of the question unless Franz or Paolo is traded for him. I'm against trading Paolo although his play has been frustrating to watch. This offense is like watching paint dry 24 seconds at a time
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,568
And1: 8,517
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#75 » by Skybox » Tue Mar 4, 2025 9:56 pm

anothermagicfan wrote:
Skybox wrote:
anothermagicfan wrote:Markkenan is an ideal center for Orlando with Paolo and Franz on the offense. He's not much of a rim defender but he would pull the opposing center out of the paint because he's a high volume 3 point threat. Opposing teams pack the paint against the magic. It's one thing to pack the paint with the help coming from guards versus packing the paint with a big when Paolo or Franz drives. Is Markkenans contract affordable and can we depend on him? What would we have to give up to get him cause that interior defense is not strong so we would need Suggs/KCP or AB on the perimeter to be on the attacking gaurds


He’s the farthest thing from a rim defender and pretty far from a Center in reality. He might be a better fit at PF (than Paolo- since this is a trade Paolo thread) next to Franz, but he’ll never be close to a passable C unless you’ve got an Isaac or JJJ or AD at “PF”…Paolo’s not that guy to play PF next to Lauri.

Perhaps, to build on earlier idea…
ORL sends: Paolo, KCP, WCJ, Cole, DEN 25 frp (top 5)
UTA sends: Lauri, Kessler, Sexton, LAL 27 frp (top 4)

Kessler, Goga, Moe
Lauri, Isaac
Franz, TdS
Suggs, Jett, frp?
Sexton, AB



I really was talking only about him being an ideal fit on offense. His contract is way out of the question unless Franz or Paolo is traded for him. I'm against trading Paolo although his play has been frustrating to watch. This offense is like watching paint dry 24 seconds at a time


So...he's not a good fit, not a Center, and not a trade possibility anyway?

Also, doesn't involve "Paolo for...?", so why here?

Why is this so hard? :crazy:
Orlando Dawg
Analyst
Posts: 3,507
And1: 123
Joined: Mar 15, 2002
Location: Orlando
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#76 » by Orlando Dawg » Tue Mar 4, 2025 10:11 pm

drsd wrote:No team can carry three max players in the new CBA!


I’ve never read any rule that states this.
As far as I know the Magic are allowed to resign all of their own players to the max if they want.
User avatar
msmoore66
Rookie
Posts: 1,200
And1: 516
Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Location: New Zealand
   

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#77 » by msmoore66 » Wed Mar 5, 2025 3:17 am

drsd wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:NBA has history of being slowest developing league among all basketball leagues when it comes to adjustments. NBA has ugly history of being copy-cat league of other successful nba teams, so most teams just build (worst) versions of current championship contending teams and that's one of reasons why most of them fail.


I agree with every pixel of your post, and want to focus on this.


Yes, there is a way to make Franz and Paolo be part of the offense where both players are involved and contribute and help team have good offensive rating. But that way isn't iso basketball. It should be pretty much opposite of that. Zero iso-basketball. Magic should be running variations of motion offense. There should be way more action where Franz is ball handler, Paolo is screener, there should be whole lot more offense where Paolo is ball handler and smaller guard is a screner who can curl to 3 point shot ( KCP for example) ,there should be way more plays where one of Franz/Paolo rush transition to take position below rim where they can use fact they are 6'10 , often guarded by smaller players.


And you just innovated on the forward-to-forward pick and roll!
See: it's easy.

In the same way that the Bulls used a SG / SF pair to run an offense, their PG and PF were just shooters only. That is what Orlando will need from both guards: one in one corner and the other in the other, as outlet kickouts for three-pointers.
Orlando's future cannot plausible involve a guard running the offense. If winning is the goal, at least.

But it also cannot and must not involve any iso-play; outside of inbound plays and late game scenarios. Which leads me to ...



There is NO logical explanation why so young team plays so slow.




I am also disgusted by this. You have talked about "wasting shot clock." Which I agree to.
And additionally, as Orlando is a very good rebounding team, I am shocked that the fast break is not a set play for this team.
Orlando can run a "Showtime" style Lakers team of the 80s effectively (Bitadze even looks a bit like Kurt Rambis these days!). So do it. It looks cool and is a high efficiency play.

Especially when Anthony steals a big's defensive rebound (to stat-pad his rebounding numbers). He is literally in a position to start a fast break at that moment.



Two excellent posts here. Unfortunately I think it means a coaching change is needed to achieve those goals.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,232
And1: 8,966
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#78 » by drsd » Wed Mar 5, 2025 7:33 am

Orlando Dawg wrote:
drsd wrote:No team can carry three max players in the new CBA!


It's not a rule. Its that after two MLE players for the starters, that means ten bench players at league min salary.
For example, the team would not be able to afford rookies. It would be that bad.
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,756
And1: 11,238
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#79 » by KillMonger » Wed Mar 5, 2025 7:54 am

drsd wrote:
Orlando Dawg wrote:
drsd wrote:No team can carry three max players in the new CBA!


It's not a rule. Its that after two MLE players for the starters, that means ten bench players at league min salary.
For example, the team would not be able to afford rookies. It would be that bad.
That's why I keep telling people.... Don't hold your breath for Trae or lamelo

Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
Image
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,232
And1: 8,966
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Paolo for…? 

Post#80 » by drsd » Wed Mar 5, 2025 8:54 am

three3d wrote: :clap: THE TRIANGLE OFFENSE would be beautiful with Franz and Paolo and Simons


After the Magic dump Caldwell-Pope, Harris, and Anthony for better shooters, the team will still be built around interior and mid-range games of the forwards. Thus: there must be innovation and creativity in the offense. You want to call it the triangle (which Suggs we be up for), fine.

Whatever comes next, as this will still be a very young team next year, it really MUST be a motion offense of some sort.

I still think the forward-to-forward PnR is the solution. Even if I am wrong, we can all agree: kill Heroball now.

Return to Orlando Magic