Image ImageImage Image

Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1341 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 9:14 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
So Suggs is a better defender and Giddey is a better PG. Its a wash.

It doesn’t work like that. The gap for defense is wider than the gap for offense. It’s not a wash. Also the Magic dont need him to be a pure PG. They need him to space the floor, attack the basket and play lockdown defense. It’s a bad comparison. Plus the Magic last year was a 48 win team and Suggs shot 39 percent from deep. He’s obviously regressed and looks like he got overpaid. Doesn’t mean that you overpay the next guy. What sense does it make to pay a guy that you said is a third option 30 million when you have no second or first option? Not much at all.


Cope. Giddey is better than Suggs and the Magic are screwed with 3 non-stars on crazy contracts.

They’re still young. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth. The Bulls are about to do the same thing with Giddey. I take your opinion with a Grain of salt because you’re extremely biased and don’t seem to have a good grasp on what’s happening around the NBA and have an over inflated opinion about Bulls players. Paolo, Franz, and a healthy Suggs are better than anyone on this roster.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1342 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 9:14 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
I would never trade Giddey for Suggs.

Depends on what your team looks like. Josh Giddey wouldn’t look good with the Magic. At least if Suggs shot isn’t falling he can play defense. Suggs probably fits on more teams easily than Giddey. I take your opinion with a grain of salt.


Ditto for you. Suggs is worse a Caruso making $30 million per.

You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. 23 year olds can’t improve? You’re contradicting yourself.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1343 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 9:15 pm

PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:It doesn’t work like that. The gap for defense is wider than the gap for offense. It’s not a wash. Also the Magic dont need him to be a pure PG. They need him to space the floor, attack the basket and play lockdown defense. It’s a bad comparison. Plus the Magic last year was a 48 win team and Suggs shot 39 percent from deep. He’s obviously regressed and looks like he got overpaid. Doesn’t mean that you overpay the next guy. What sense does it make to pay a guy that you said is a third option 30 million when you have no second or first option? Not much at all.


Cope. Giddey is better than Suggs and the Magic are screwed with 3 non-stars on crazy contracts.

They’re still young. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth. The Bulls are about to do the same thing with Giddey. I take your opinion with a Grain of salt because you’re extremely biased and don’t seem to have a good grasp on what’s happening around the NBA and have an over inflated opinion about Bulls players. Paolo, Franz, and a healthy Suggs are better than anyone on this roster.


:lol:
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1344 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 9:19 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Cope. Giddey is better than Suggs and the Magic are screwed with 3 non-stars on crazy contracts.

They’re still young. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth. The Bulls are about to do the same thing with Giddey. I take your opinion with a Grain of salt because you’re extremely biased and don’t seem to have a good grasp on what’s happening around the NBA and have an over inflated opinion about Bulls players. Paolo, Franz, and a healthy Suggs are better than anyone on this roster.


:lol:

Actually pay attention to other teams other than the Bulls instead of laughing maybe you’ll learn something. You’re literally contradicting yourself right now. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 9,755
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1345 » by Lunartic » Sun Mar 9, 2025 9:35 pm

PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:It doesn’t work like that. The gap for defense is wider than the gap for offense. It’s not a wash. Also the Magic dont need him to be a pure PG. They need him to space the floor, attack the basket and play lockdown defense. It’s a bad comparison. Plus the Magic last year was a 48 win team and Suggs shot 39 percent from deep. He’s obviously regressed and looks like he got overpaid. Doesn’t mean that you overpay the next guy. What sense does it make to pay a guy that you said is a third option 30 million when you have no second or first option? Not much at all.


Cope. Giddey is better than Suggs and the Magic are screwed with 3 non-stars on crazy contracts.

They’re still young. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth. The Bulls are about to do the same thing with Giddey. I take your opinion with a Grain of salt because you’re extremely biased and don’t seem to have a good grasp on what’s happening around the NBA and have an over inflated opinion about Bulls players. Paolo, Franz, and a healthy Suggs are better than anyone on this roster.


The Magic have 3 better players than anyone one the Bulls but have only 4 more wins than the injury-plagued, should-be-tanking Bulls? The Bulls also won 2-1 this season against the Magic. A bit odd.

Methinks they're not as good players as you suggest.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,748
And1: 4,009
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1346 » by jnrjr79 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 11:09 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
kodo wrote:Josh's #s since Lavine stopped playing (16 games):

19.1 ppg 8.3 rpg 6.9 apg
46.7% 3P% 62.5% TS

Just for reference, Haliburton ($50M per year average):
18.5 ppg 3.5 rpg 8.9 apg
39.0% 3P%, 61.2% TS

I think the big question is how much does that 3P% normalize. He's already up to 38% over the season while adjusting to Chicago.
I'd love to have him long term at $20M but it seems like he's way beyond the Bojan Bogdanovic price tier at this point.

Who’s going to offer him that other than the Bulls?


You do realize he has the option take the qualifying offer? It’s not like he has to accept anything that’s offered. He can bet on himself, play great next season and then say screw us and walk.


Sure, but not a lot of guys turn down their first big long-term contract to do this, given the risk.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1347 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 11:14 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:Who’s going to offer him that other than the Bulls?


You do realize he has the option take the qualifying offer? It’s not like he has to accept anything that’s offered. He can bet on himself, play great next season and then say screw us and walk.


Sure, but not a lot of guys turn down their first big long-term contract to do this, given the risk.


Butler did it and ended up with a much bigger contract. I agree it’s rare, but it’s an option he can use.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1348 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 11:40 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
kodo wrote:Josh's #s since Lavine stopped playing (16 games):

19.1 ppg 8.3 rpg 6.9 apg
46.7% 3P% 62.5% TS

Just for reference, Haliburton ($50M per year average):
18.5 ppg 3.5 rpg 8.9 apg
39.0% 3P%, 61.2% TS

I think the big question is how much does that 3P% normalize. He's already up to 38% over the season while adjusting to Chicago.
I'd love to have him long term at $20M but it seems like he's way beyond the Bojan Bogdanovic price tier at this point.

Who’s going to offer him that other than the Bulls?


You do realize he has the option take the qualifying offer? It’s not like he has to accept anything that’s offered. He can bet on himself, play great next season and then say screw us and walk.

I’m just saying that the Bulls should let him fetch an offer like Zach and go from there.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1349 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 11:49 pm

Lunartic wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Cope. Giddey is better than Suggs and the Magic are screwed with 3 non-stars on crazy contracts.

They’re still young. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth. The Bulls are about to do the same thing with Giddey. I take your opinion with a Grain of salt because you’re extremely biased and don’t seem to have a good grasp on what’s happening around the NBA and have an over inflated opinion about Bulls players. Paolo, Franz, and a healthy Suggs are better than anyone on this roster.


The Magic have 3 better players than anyone one the Bulls but have only 4 more wins than the injury-plagued, should-be-tanking Bulls? The Bulls also won 2-1 this season against the Magic. A bit odd.

Methinks they're not as good players as you suggest.

They’ve been banged up this year. They’ve won 48 games last year when they were healthy. The issue other than health is that they can’t hit open threes. They are more talented than the Bulls. The Bulls are 4-9 since trading Lavine. Which translates to about 25 wins in a full season.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,678
And1: 43,936
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1350 » by zimpy27 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:21 am

Giddey was 17/8/7 @ 52% TS on OKC without SGA
Giddey has been 17/8/7 @ 60% TS on Bulls without LaVine

What's also notable with the Bulls is the improves defensive stats and 3 shooting.

Giddey has improved every year in his scoring. I think at peak he will have a 20 point triple double season.

Surrounding him with 3+D players does provide Bulls a path towards playoffs and maybe contention depending on the quality of the 3+D players.

,
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
GuardianEnzo
Senior
Posts: 727
And1: 429
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1351 » by GuardianEnzo » Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:59 am

Giddey’s 3 % has markedly improved every season he’s been in the league. It’s better post all-star than pre all-star break. He’s working with a good shooting coach in Patton. Obviously he won’t sustain 54% but no reason to think he can’t settle consistently around 40%. And Giddey at 40% on threes is a very good player.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,481
And1: 9,124
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1352 » by Chi town » Mon Mar 10, 2025 2:33 am

zimpy27 wrote:Giddey was 17/8/7 @ 52% TS on OKC without SGA
Giddey has been 17/8/7 @ 60% TS on Bulls without LaVine

What's also notable with the Bulls is the improves defensive stats and 3 shooting.

Giddey has improved every year in his scoring. I think at peak he will have a 20 point triple double season.

Surrounding him with 3+D players does provide Bulls a path towards playoffs and maybe contention depending on the quality of the 3+D players.

,



An outsider that believes in The Giddler!

Peak 20pt trip dub season… has anyone ever done that?
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,481
And1: 9,124
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1353 » by Chi town » Mon Mar 10, 2025 2:59 am

Giddey’s clips are always 3+ mins because they show his assists too.

https://youtu.be/anQbqj0rgXI?si=rxWqd46jILuThOzF
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,866
And1: 18,948
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1354 » by dougthonus » Mon Mar 10, 2025 5:22 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Andi Obst wrote:I love this board. Giddey either sucks or he's worth 150 mil.


$25 million per for this production would be one of the biggest steals in the NBA. The only question is whether it is sustainable. I think it is other than the 50 percent 3 point shooting. I think that normalizes around 37 percent. Which is fine and higher than plenty of “stars”.


I think this is true, but it's also true that it feels overwhelmingly likely that it is not sustainable (to me). However, if he can average 62.5% TS% for a year, Giddey's a very good player, defensive warts and all.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,678
And1: 43,936
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1355 » by zimpy27 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 6:02 am

Chi town wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Giddey was 17/8/7 @ 52% TS on OKC without SGA
Giddey has been 17/8/7 @ 60% TS on Bulls without LaVine

What's also notable with the Bulls is the improves defensive stats and 3 shooting.

Giddey has improved every year in his scoring. I think at peak he will have a 20 point triple double season.

Surrounding him with 3+D players does provide Bulls a path towards playoffs and maybe contention depending on the quality of the 3+D players.

,



An outsider that believes in The Giddler!

Peak 20pt trip dub season… has anyone ever done that?



Well Westbrook did in Washington the season before he joined Lakers. But he did on 51% TS.

That wizards team went to the playoffs and Westbrook got MVP votes.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,192
And1: 15,450
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1356 » by DASMACKDOWN » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:40 am

We just have to be cost efficient no matter what.

But besides all that, what I notice so far, is we keep moving the goal post for Giddey.

Because he basically has improved on every metrics we asked over the course of the season. But some people still want to crap on it for whatever reason and say things like he deserves no more than 15 mil. That is absurd.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,080
And1: 4,650
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1357 » by Jvaughn » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:52 am

DASMACKDOWN wrote:We just have to be cost efficient no matter what.

But besides all that, what I notice so far, is we keep moving the goal post for Giddey.

Because he basically has improved on every metrics we asked over the course of the season. But some people still want to crap on it for whatever reason and say things like he deserves no more than 15 mil. That is absurd.


Yeah, this is what scares me. FO already threw huge (undeserved) money at PAW when it was clear to anyone watching, we were going into a rebuilding process. Tying an additional $25-30 million into Giddey would mean we'd have over a quarter of our cap spoken for in 2 players when we're nowhere near ready to compete. I think Giddey can be one of the most important pieces on a contender, but we have to make sure we navigate this cap correctly b
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
RSP83
Head Coach
Posts: 7,133
And1: 4,174
Joined: Sep 14, 2010
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1358 » by RSP83 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:31 pm

Can we give Giddey Zach's old contract (4 yr, 78 million)?

I just realized Pat is making roughly the same. Which means Giddey will probably receive more, 4 yr 92 million should be a fair value no?
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,408
And1: 9,209
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1359 » by sco » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:38 pm

RSP83 wrote:Can we give Giddey Zach's old contract (4 yr, 78 million)?

I just realized Pat is making roughly the same. Which means Giddey will probably receive more, 4 yr 92 million should be a fair value no?

If I'm guessing right now, it will come in at 4/85.
:clap:
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,408
And1: 9,209
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1360 » by sco » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:43 pm

Chi town wrote:Giddey’s clips are always 3+ mins because they show his assists too.

https://youtu.be/anQbqj0rgXI?si=rxWqd46jILuThOzF

The things that stand out to me in what he does that makes a team better are that:

1) He is actually able to penetrate deep into the paint off the dribble in the half court and create gravity.
2) He drives in the paint with his head up and consistently finds both cutters and open 3pt shooters
3) He is able to keep defenders on his back when driving

Those are things that the really good big playmakers do, and something I haven't seen on the Bulls this century.
:clap:

Return to Chicago Bulls