paulpressey25 wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:This is honestly better than that FVV and just Eason trade that you love though lol. Jabari's still only 21 and has much more offensive potential yet to unlock, and a lottery pick in this draft is ideal, also as a trade asset. You obviously ask for another asset/draft pick if we're being forced to eat Van Vleet's bad salary though.
FVV has a team option on his $44mm deal and he's needed to match salaries. And yes, I'd push Houston for as much as they'd give back.
At the same time, our current perception of Dame's value is different (higher) than where the league's perception will be come June (unless Dame does great in the playoffs). We're sort of in a Durant/Suns type position here.
The trade market is all over the place right now in large part due to no one really understanding yet how to navigate the new CBA. Jimmy got dealt for a pittance and Luka got dealt for the most underwhelming star return in modern NBA history, while Mikal Bridges commanded a 4-5 pick haul. But other GM's aren't blind. They're seeing the Jimmy fallout, they're seeing Dame/Giannis be wasted by Doc and incompetent team construction/management.
Which is to say I don't think that a late lottery pick, a solid young player who hasn't exceeded expectations as a Top-5 pick, and just straight up bad/negative salary is much of a haul for a guy who's still putting up All-Star numbers and has a playoff riser pedigree. Those guys don't completely depreciate in value until they actually look cooked (see: Paul George), not just because teams are scared of the age. I'm furious that we've arrived at this point, but it's arguably one out of necessity. It was always going to be a 2, maybe 3-year window the second we acquired Dame to get Giannis another ring. We're about to absolutely squander the best 2-years of that window, so here we are.