RRyder823 wrote:Hold up.
Didn't you say you'd rather have 10 years of contention (or even just belief on contention) versus just a single championship?
What about 6-7 years of that contention with a championship thrown in or would you say that championship isn't worth the extra 3 years?
Or is your entire argument pretty much never go all in because you might be sacrificing the NEXT 5-10 years?
I can understand the point of the latter in say the NFL as the PO format is much more volatile and it's get in and see what happens most years but in the NBA even the marquee franchises generally(not always) have to take out at least slight mortgages on their futures to win it all and this is Milwaukee we're talking about
Obviously I'd say the 6-7 yrs of contention w/ a championship over 10 w/out one. The 10 yrs of contention v. 1 random yr winning a championship is a hypothetical, speaking more to my philosophy. It doesn't exactly describe our situation or a typical one.
Our situation was, we were already slightly lower-tiered contenders. Then for a few years, to be slightly higher-tiered contenders, we dealt away picks (& assets) 7 years into the future. After that you might need 5-7 more to be very good again. Sacrificing 12-14 years for a slightly higher chance of winning a championship. Now, we did in that span (who knows if we'd have in the alternative route). But I'd have rather taken my chances in the other route, preserved the future, and lived w/ the results in the interim.
The Bucks could dig their way out of this in a plan B win now, or a rebuild. But I don't think the average front office would pull it off w/ what they have to work w/, let alone the one the Bucks have had during this time. So I'm not optimistic. Not where you want to be as a fan.