UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
OG was the more sought after archtype and proven starter, while Lively is best suited to a platoon/can't handle a starters workload. OG played ~35 mpg while Lively plays ~24 mpg. he had 3 years of 67+ gp prior to his 2 injury riddled years. the following 3 years he averaged 66 gp. Lively's a bigger health risk than OG was back then. I think Lively's value will take a hit down the road w/o Doncic but happy to be proven wrong and for him to break out.
Lively has played exactly 2 seasons, last hear he missed time because of the death of his mother, he hasn't really had the chance to play multiple seasons.
The defensice ceiling Lively displayed in high stakes PO games is something OG never showed in TOR, archetype or not, impact wise Lively is in a different tier.
Yeah, he's going to struggle to play more than 30 MPG with his style.
Maybe he was holding back showing off his all defense tier impact this past week because he’s anti play in tourney. /greenfont
Very very interested to track the validity of your take next season when he plays a full season without Luka. The fit next to AD will be interesting to see how they manage. I very much doubt Lively will be a name on end of season lists but I’ll give benefit of the doubt for his return since April to say he still needed time to ramp up to competitive shape
Indeed...
Dereck Lively this year as a 21 y/o second year player has:
8.5/7.5/2.5 playing 23 MPG, he has 7 net rating 11 on/off.
This includes the post injury games, and half of the games were w/o Luka.
He has the these numbers coming of a PO run of 21 games where he posted similar raw numbers, but with higher impact stats.
He came back from stress fracture in his ankle, we have the following samples of Lively:
Last season RS.
Last year PO, double digit on/off over 20+ PO games.
This season RS with and w/o Luka before injury.
And we have the small sample since he came back from injury, 3 months off most of it in walking boot, and has played all of 5 games.
Over 3 of these 4 samples, my assessment stands, over the 4th one it doesn't, but we'll indeed see in the future what really holds.