Buttah304 wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:Buttah304 wrote:If these numbers don’t concern you then I feel as a group RealGM should get a collective lobotomy.
Brunson’s USG% on the year is around 28% and last night it was 39.4% - that represents a 40% increase.
NBA teams AVG time of possession in 24-25 was 14.4 seconds - Brunson himself was at 10.6 seconds in Game 2 in case you are wondering why we are never a hockey assist away from a functional possession. There is no mismatch hunting, transition oops, double screens, stagger screens, pin downs or curl plays. We don’t push the pace off a missed FG or FTA - it’s stuck in the mud.
As far as touches are concerned, Brunson had 104 last night when he was closer to 84 on the season.
In fact, if you look at game 2 as far as who Jalen passed the ball to, Bridges received 38, Hart 32 and KAT only had 12 passes delivered from JB.
This offense is an utter indictment of Thibs and it’s truly the worst coaching I’ve seen him do across 6 years as a Knick HC. He has no clue how to adapt to his player personnel or the opposing HC, he will never be proactive to seek a way to win on the margins. It’s laughable.
dr. buttah, context matters.
it's easy to look at those numbers and not think about why. that usage wasn't the gameplan. the variance you point out inherently says as much. they know we know we should be moving the ball. that's why they forced the ISOs and won.
if you listen to thibs talk, you often hear him agreeing with what posters complain about and trying to get the players to execute it. is it possible he can't? sure. different conversation. but to think a 2X COY doesn't know what you're saying makes me laugh out loud on this forum.
like, "oh snap. user X really thinks they not only 'know ball' more than a lifelong professional... they think said pro doesn't even conceptually know what we're talking about." it's insulting to the coach and readers.
Respectfully, it just sounds like you’re okay with making every excuse in the book for Thibs when we have seen this same movie play out over the course of his career.
not at all. thibs has much to account for. that's a bit of a goalpost move from what i actually said.
i spoke specifically about the idea that the coach doesn't understand ball movement and that he actually publicly asks it of the players. i also said that if he can't get them to do it, that's another conversation -- as in, a coaching problem that needs to be addressed.
but you shared numbers about a game and presented it as what he wanted when there is evidence it was not the plan. that's the point you seem to have missed or intentionally sidestepped.
the point is more that removing the nuance takes power away from some arguments because they seem disingenuous.
i'm in here talking ball with people i disagree with all day. gladly. it's actually helping me process the frustration from last night's L.