Enzo954 wrote:Kampuchea wrote:This game doesn’t matter so much, game 4 is the must win.
Every game matters in the playoffs!
Just ask the 2004 Yankees



Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Enzo954 wrote:Kampuchea wrote:This game doesn’t matter so much, game 4 is the must win.
Every game matters in the playoffs!
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Jeff Van Gully wrote:dakomish23 wrote:G1 Q1 NYK 27 DET 27
G1 Q2 NYK 30 DET 28
G1 Q3 NYK 26 DET 36
G1 Q4 NYK 40 DET 26
G2 Q1 NYK 18 DET 25
G2 Q2 NYK 31 DET 30
G2 Q3 NYK 18 DET 20
G2 Q4 NYK 27 DET 25
5 of the 8 quarters are within 2 pts or less. This series is a lot tighter than some want to admit.
This is a war. I’m here for it.
Even with my sweep prediction I never thought it would be a dragging. Was just hoping it wouldn’t go long.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
dakomish23 wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:dakomish23 wrote:G1 Q1 NYK 27 DET 27
G1 Q2 NYK 30 DET 28
G1 Q3 NYK 26 DET 36
G1 Q4 NYK 40 DET 26
G2 Q1 NYK 18 DET 25
G2 Q2 NYK 31 DET 30
G2 Q3 NYK 18 DET 20
G2 Q4 NYK 27 DET 25
5 of the 8 quarters are within 2 pts or less. This series is a lot tighter than some want to admit.
This is a war. I’m here for it.
Even with my sweep prediction I never thought it would be a dragging. Was just hoping it wouldn’t go long.
DET still hasn't had a game where Cade is Cade while THJ / Beasley make even their season avg % on 3's. We could have two of those games in the final 5.
dakomish23 wrote:Enzo954 wrote:Kampuchea wrote:This game doesn’t matter so much, game 4 is the must win.
Every game matters in the playoffs!
Just ask the 2004 Yankees![]()
![]()
dakomish23 wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:dakomish23 wrote:G1 Q1 NYK 27 DET 27
G1 Q2 NYK 30 DET 28
G1 Q3 NYK 26 DET 36
G1 Q4 NYK 40 DET 26
G2 Q1 NYK 18 DET 25
G2 Q2 NYK 31 DET 30
G2 Q3 NYK 18 DET 20
G2 Q4 NYK 27 DET 25
5 of the 8 quarters are within 2 pts or less. This series is a lot tighter than some want to admit.
This is a war. I’m here for it.
Even with my sweep prediction I never thought it would be a dragging. Was just hoping it wouldn’t go long.
DET still hasn't had a game where Cade is Cade while THJ / Beasley make even their season avg % on 3's. We could have two of those games in the final 5.
LFGK wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:
This is a war. I’m here for it.
Even with my sweep prediction I never thought it would be a dragging. Was just hoping it wouldn’t go long.
DET still hasn't had a game where Cade is Cade while THJ / Beasley make even their season avg % on 3's. We could have two of those games in the final 5.
both those things happening is pretty unlikely, This is a tight series but I think Knicks make a change for game 3 and win in not such a tough game.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
dakomish23 wrote:LFGK wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
DET still hasn't had a game where Cade is Cade while THJ / Beasley make even their season avg % on 3's. We could have two of those games in the final 5.
both those things happening is pretty unlikely, This is a tight series but I think Knicks make a change for game 3 and win in not such a tough game.
Why would it be unlikely. The just did it for 82 games and we're not some defensive juggernaut. Do you know how many WIDE OPEN 3s THJ & Beasley missed in game 2? That should have been a 20 point loss
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:They were 22-19 at home, I'd expect a win just because young teams like that can generally have too much energy for their first home playoff game and end up doing stupid stuff going for homeruns to amp up the crowd.
rajajackal wrote:thibs should turn the starting lineup into a thibs team (mitch/pj tucker/og/deuce/brunson) and then let the nova boys spice the bench up
Fury wrote:rajajackal wrote:thibs should turn the starting lineup into a thibs team (mitch/pj tucker/og/deuce/brunson) and then let the nova boys spice the bench up