god shammgod wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:god shammgod wrote:at some point you're all gonna look back and admit that we made these trades and we didn't get any better. which has been my whole point since the summer. all our money and assets to move laterally.
It’s all matchups tho Sham
If we Advance to the ECF does it make us better?
Or does a quality Knicks team just exist in a time when there’s a buzz saw in the East ?
Then that’s even more reason to wait for someone like Giannis before we give up all our picks
One idea when making trades is that you can always re-use the value in different ways including subsequent trades if things don't exactly work out.
It's why the pushback against the Donovan Mitchell trade in late August never made sense to me. They could've always traded either Brunson or Mitchell if the backcourt didn't work (I think it absolutely could have). They would have likely gotten just as much value in return. In fact, the value of that Knicks package has declined since the trade, while Donovan's profile has risen.
The KAT trade was a fair deal. Sure, you may not like KAT or whatever, but he's an All-NBA center this year, and we didn't lose any blue-chip asset.
The problem was the Mikal trade because we'll never recoup the value from the deal. It was a massive overpay from the start and we lost a ton of value in that trade. Lost value that we can't translate into wins or use in future trades.
We can't overlook how much of this value we lost by losing Hartenstein and (for a time) Mitch. The summer was an uphill climb after that to even just reach the level from last year again. That, more than anything, warranted a more cautious approach. I think the KAT deal was reasonable. The Mikal trade on the other hand was reckless.