Kobewade11 wrote:twix2500 wrote:Kobewade11 wrote:I guess what I’m getting at is; is putting Herro in iso situations at the top of the perimeter against longer defenders the best use of his talents?
I mean if you are a guard, you should be licking your chops if a 7 footer comes out on the perimeter to defend you. Max Strus is defending Herro fullcourt and Herro is struggling to get by him. What is the matchup that Herro can dominate? You see Cavs goes right at Herro on defense with almost all their players. Is there anyone Herro can beat on the Cavs? He is your best ball handler scorer/playmaker.
Again, this is kind of skating around the question. If you’re a ball handling guard you are probably licking your chops at a big in space. I dont consider Herro to be an elite ball handler.
Everyone is really on the same point, but is just discussing it differently--Herro is at his best when he can be a secondary playmaker with a lot more off-ball action. He's not an offensive engine. The problem is Miami doesn't have a first option. It's the same issue with Bam. He's at his best doing the big man work that is typically called for from a BIG while functioning as a playmaking hub and play finisher, but again, Miami doesn't have a first option. So everyone is relied on to do more than what they can/should do (and thus has less opportunity to do what they do best). Offense lacks a foundation. You can't build without a foundation.
If Miami had a #1 on offense, then suddenly Herro's offball work can be maximized and both Herro and Bam's secondary playmaking and creation will be seen as found money rather than something that the team desperately needs on every possession.
Davion Mitchell checks some role-player PG boxes, but you cannot run a quality NBA offense with him as the high usage guy.