ImageImageImage

PF targets

Moderators: Snakebites, dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip

User avatar
A_dub06
Starter
Posts: 2,037
And1: 955
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: PF targets 

Post#41 » by A_dub06 » Thu May 8, 2025 11:02 am

zeebneeb wrote:I'm just hoping Langdon doesn't create a hole, trying to fill another one.(Trade Ivey in a package for a PF)

I'm pretty much OK with any PF, as long as they can shoot, and shoot well. If they can block shots, bonus. Also, as someone else mentioned, I want someone who is in the 6'10-11 range, instead of being another 6'7-8 guy again. Real size.

I think people have a tendency to forget how much Ivey was blossoming when he went down. Two game winners(huge added bonus for the team. A clutch player)and shooting 40+% from three.

If Langdon moves Ivey in a package, it better be for a stunner like JJJ, or Bam.


I agree with not wanting Langdon to create a hole by filling another but isn’t targeting a taller PF if Duren is traded the exact same thing?

Tari Eason (23) (6’8” height and 7’2” wingspan) in 24mpg: 12ppg, 6.4rpg, 1.5apg, 1.7spg, 0.9bpg on 48.7% fg and 34% 3p

Naz Reid (25) (6’9.5” height and 7’3.5” wingspan) in 27.5mpg: 14.2ppg, 6rpg, 2.3apg, 0.7spg, 0.9bpg on 45.2% fg and 37.9% 3p

Santi Aldama (24) (6’11” height) in 25.5mpg: 12.5ppg, 6.4rpg, 2.9apg, 0.8spg, 0.4bpg on 48.3% fg and 36.8% 3p

Jabari Smith jnr (21) in 30.1mpg: 12.2ppg, 7rpg, 1.1 apg, 0.4spg, 0.7bpg on 43.8% fg and 35.4% 3p.

From this list you’re automatically excluding Eason just based on height, which I think an argument could easily be made thathe has the highest floor as well as ceiling and is the far superior defender.
mike06181
Sophomore
Posts: 119
And1: 61
Joined: Sep 06, 2020

Re: PF targets 

Post#42 » by mike06181 » Thu May 8, 2025 11:07 am

The two injuries prove they need someone better than bball paul on the bench. Otherwise bring them back. I can see thjr going and replaced by ivey. Otherwise bring the other vets back. Solid 5 deep at guard so run some small lineups at times. See if klintman can be the bball paul replacement. Otherwise find a vet for that role in case one of the bigs get hurt in playoffs again.
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,413
And1: 12,938
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: PF targets 

Post#43 » by zeebneeb » Thu May 8, 2025 12:35 pm

A_dub06 wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:I'm just hoping Langdon doesn't create a hole, trying to fill another one.(Trade Ivey in a package for a PF)

I'm pretty much OK with any PF, as long as they can shoot, and shoot well. If they can block shots, bonus. Also, as someone else mentioned, I want someone who is in the 6'10-11 range, instead of being another 6'7-8 guy again. Real size.

I think people have a tendency to forget how much Ivey was blossoming when he went down. Two game winners(huge added bonus for the team. A clutch player)and shooting 40+% from three.

If Langdon moves Ivey in a package, it better be for a stunner like JJJ, or Bam.


I agree with not wanting Langdon to create a hole by filling another but isn’t targeting a taller PF if Duren is traded the exact same thing?

Tari Eason (23) (6’8” height and 7’2” wingspan) in 24mpg: 12ppg, 6.4rpg, 1.5apg, 1.7spg, 0.9bpg on 48.7% fg and 34% 3p

Naz Reid (25) (6’9.5” height and 7’3.5” wingspan) in 27.5mpg: 14.2ppg, 6rpg, 2.3apg, 0.7spg, 0.9bpg on 45.2% fg and 37.9% 3p

Santi Aldama (24) (6’11” height) in 25.5mpg: 12.5ppg, 6.4rpg, 2.9apg, 0.8spg, 0.4bpg on 48.3% fg and 36.8% 3p

Jabari Smith jnr (21) in 30.1mpg: 12.2ppg, 7rpg, 1.1 apg, 0.4spg, 0.7bpg on 43.8% fg and 35.4% 3p.

From this list you’re automatically excluding Eason just based on height, which I think an argument could easily be made thathe has the highest floor as well as ceiling and is the far superior defender.
I'm not excluding anyone, but shorter players have their limitations, unless they are Ben Wallace. Stewart is smaller as well, and even with his game changing defense, like Big Ben, he doesn't have Ben's hops, so he's limited in terms of weakside help.

I dont see a universe in where Langdon trades Duren, and I think (i could be wrong) people need to accept that. Cade is the franchise. Removing the bigman that that is the second piece in the most successful lob threat in the league is super dangerous, unless your replacing him with a better player in that archetype. Good luck.

Look at Boston/Cavs/OKC/Denver/NY They all have SIZE. The Pistons are close, but Harris is not a true blue PF, as shown by having to guard KAT. Now, lets say the Pistons nab Naz, without giving up core pieces. He is 6'9, but he is highly skilled. He can shoot the lights out, dribble drive, e.t.c.

In the end, I have my preferences, but I'm gonna trust Langdon. From the sounds of it, everything I've read is that Langdon is going to stay the course, and not make any rash moves, giving away core, young pieces to make a splash.

A full time starting PF upgrade over Harris seems like the only move that needs to be made, and if Langdon does nothing, im willing to bet we will start seeing Klintman get real minutes early in the season behind Harris. There is a reason he signed him to a 4 year deal.

Cade/???
Ivey/Beasley
Ausar/Holland
Harris/Klintman
Duren/Stewart

I am unsure if Schroder will be back, and if Sasser remains, thus the ??? Behind Cade.

In the end, I've enjoyed reading everyone's ideas. I really can't poo-poo anyone mentioned, in terms of player. I dont like trading core pieces(Ivey/Duren)to do so, as it just creates another hole, but sometimes you gotta do that, I get it. Stagnation is its own special hell.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,986
And1: 1,950
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#44 » by Canadafan » Thu May 8, 2025 1:11 pm

Imagine we sign and trade for Portis using Sasser+Fontecchio with our extra cap space +Toronto2nd plus future 2nds if needed. 6'10"250LBS of BadBoy style with an outside shot.
Use remaining cap space to sign Beasley to his MLE similar money.
Use Room Exception to sign Shröder to near starting $9mil salary. 5%raises for 3 years makes Dennis a happy camper.
Use vet minimum to sign THJR to near $4mil salary.
Maybe Use vet minimum for Reed and Waters.

Duren Stew Reed
Tobias Portis Klintman
Ausar Holland THJR
Ivey Beasley Waters
Cade Shröder

Glorious :nod:

As long as Stew and Portis get along off the court :P
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,791
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: PF targets 

Post#45 » by the_l_train » Thu May 8, 2025 2:07 pm

Canadafan wrote:Imagine we sign and trade for Portis using Sasser+Fontecchio with our extra cap space +Toronto2nd plus future 2nds if needed. 6'10"250LBS of BadBoy style with an outside shot.
Use remaining cap space to sign Beasley to his MLE similar money.
Use Room Exception to sign Shröder to near starting $9mil salary. 5%raises for 3 years makes Dennis a happy camper.
Use vet minimum to sign THJR to near $4mil salary.
Maybe Use vet minimum for Reed and Waters.

Duren Stew Reed
Tobias Portis Klintman
Ausar Holland THJR
Ivey Beasley Waters
Cade Shröder

Glorious :nod:

As long as Stew and Portis get along off the court :P


Love it.

Out of all the somewhat “realistic” outcomes this offseason, getting Portis in a trade like this, bringing back Beas/Shroder on team friendly deals, then signing Jake Laravia would be an A+.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,986
And1: 1,950
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#46 » by Canadafan » Thu May 8, 2025 3:53 pm

the_l_train wrote:
Canadafan wrote:Imagine we sign and trade for Portis using Sasser+Fontecchio with our extra cap space +Toronto2nd plus future 2nds if needed. 6'10"250LBS of BadBoy style with an outside shot.
Use remaining cap space to sign Beasley to his MLE similar money.
Use Room Exception to sign Shröder to near starting $9mil salary. 5%raises for 3 years makes Dennis a happy camper.
Use vet minimum to sign THJR to near $4mil salary.
Maybe Use vet minimum for Reed and Waters.

Duren Stew Reed
Tobias Portis Klintman
Ausar Holland THJR
Ivey Beasley Waters
Cade Shröder

Glorious :nod:

As long as Stew and Portis get along off the court :P


Love it.

Out of all the somewhat “realistic” outcomes this offseason, getting Portis in a trade like this, bringing back Beas/Shroder on team friendly deals, then signing Jake Laravia would be an A+.


Yessss. I'd luv to get Portis. He hates Indy for one. He's tough , shoots well and is only 30. Perfect backup to split minutes with Tobias.
If Bucks trade Giannis, there's zero reason for them to hold onto him. Even if he just picks up his player option, I'd definitely take him on .
Would be fun for us to keep that Toeonto 2nd though. Give us a little excitement at draft time to pick a prospect.
Jake Laravia i definitely do not know anything about him though :-?
User avatar
Rip32
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,448
And1: 284
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: PF targets 

Post#47 » by Rip32 » Thu May 8, 2025 4:44 pm

Canadafan wrote:
the_l_train wrote:
Canadafan wrote:Imagine we sign and trade for Portis using Sasser+Fontecchio with our extra cap space +Toronto2nd plus future 2nds if needed. 6'10"250LBS of BadBoy style with an outside shot.
Use remaining cap space to sign Beasley to his MLE similar money.
Use Room Exception to sign Shröder to near starting $9mil salary. 5%raises for 3 years makes Dennis a happy camper.
Use vet minimum to sign THJR to near $4mil salary.
Maybe Use vet minimum for Reed and Waters.

Duren Stew Reed
Tobias Portis Klintman
Ausar Holland THJR
Ivey Beasley Waters
Cade Shröder

Glorious :nod:

As long as Stew and Portis get along off the court :P


Love it.

Out of all the somewhat “realistic” outcomes this offseason, getting Portis in a trade like this, bringing back Beas/Shroder on team friendly deals, then signing Jake Laravia would be an A+.


Yessss. I'd luv to get Portis. He hates Indy for one. He's tough , shoots well and is only 30. Perfect backup to split minutes with Tobias.
If Bucks trade Giannis, there's zero reason for them to hold onto him. Even if he just picks up his player option, I'd definitely take him on .
Would be fun for us to keep that Toeonto 2nd though. Give us a little excitement at draft time to pick a prospect.
Jake Laravia i definitely do not know anything about him though :-?

No thanks to Portis! I'd rather rely on Harris so at least Harris shoots and he can post up. Portis is a fake wanna be tough guy who just shoots threes. I want us to stay away from specialist or sign them cheap
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,791
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: PF targets 

Post#48 » by the_l_train » Thu May 8, 2025 5:08 pm

Canadafan wrote:
the_l_train wrote:
Canadafan wrote:Imagine we sign and trade for Portis using Sasser+Fontecchio with our extra cap space +Toronto2nd plus future 2nds if needed. 6'10"250LBS of BadBoy style with an outside shot.
Use remaining cap space to sign Beasley to his MLE similar money.
Use Room Exception to sign Shröder to near starting $9mil salary. 5%raises for 3 years makes Dennis a happy camper.
Use vet minimum to sign THJR to near $4mil salary.
Maybe Use vet minimum for Reed and Waters.

Duren Stew Reed
Tobias Portis Klintman
Ausar Holland THJR
Ivey Beasley Waters
Cade Shröder

Glorious :nod:

As long as Stew and Portis get along off the court :P


Love it.

Out of all the somewhat “realistic” outcomes this offseason, getting Portis in a trade like this, bringing back Beas/Shroder on team friendly deals, then signing Jake Laravia would be an A+.


Yessss. I'd luv to get Portis. He hates Indy for one. He's tough , shoots well and is only 30. Perfect backup to split minutes with Tobias.
If Bucks trade Giannis, there's zero reason for them to hold onto him. Even if he just picks up his player option, I'd definitely take him on .
Would be fun for us to keep that Toeonto 2nd though. Give us a little excitement at draft time to pick a prospect.
Jake Laravia i definitely do not know anything about him though :-?




On Jake Laravia, here is how my Grizzlies fan buddy described him:

"Glue guy, connector --- not great at anything, but good at everything. Offense was getting more consistent before we traded him."

Can play PF and SF, and I look at him as a younger (cheaper?) Fontechio replacement. Hoping he would actually wear #33 for us as well --- Grant Hill is basically dead to me after seemingly rooting for the Knicks in every playoff game he announced.
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,791
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: PF targets 

Post#49 » by the_l_train » Thu May 8, 2025 5:11 pm

Rip32 wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
the_l_train wrote:
Love it.

Out of all the somewhat “realistic” outcomes this offseason, getting Portis in a trade like this, bringing back Beas/Shroder on team friendly deals, then signing Jake Laravia would be an A+.


Yessss. I'd luv to get Portis. He hates Indy for one. He's tough , shoots well and is only 30. Perfect backup to split minutes with Tobias.
If Bucks trade Giannis, there's zero reason for them to hold onto him. Even if he just picks up his player option, I'd definitely take him on .
Would be fun for us to keep that Toeonto 2nd though. Give us a little excitement at draft time to pick a prospect.
Jake Laravia i definitely do not know anything about him though :-?

No thanks to Portis! I'd rather rely on Harris so at least Harris shoots and he can post up. Portis is a fake wanna be tough guy who just shoots threes. I want us to stay away from specialist or sign them cheap


Portis is a guy you hate to play, but love him if he is on your team.

If the asking price is only Fontechio/Sasser and future protected picks --- its a no-brainer for our current situation. Instant fan favorite, and a stretch big is our exact need.

Dude was born to be a Piston, and Beef Stew/Portis/Holland would be an all-time "dark alley" guy lineup. Born killers.

Bucks fans love him so much they might wind up keeping him for that alone --- losing Giannis and Portis in the same summer might make the fan base turn on them. They are in desperate need of draft picks though, and lets hope they completely blow it up.
NYPiston
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,701
And1: 4,262
Joined: Jun 21, 2019
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#50 » by NYPiston » Thu May 8, 2025 5:12 pm

theBigLip wrote:Looking forward, seems like a good shooting PF is what we need. Harris has been above expectations, but we need a long term solution. So what’s your ranked target list?

Mine is something like this:
Giannis
Bam
Naz
Porzingis
KD

I don’t mind giving up draft picks, but don’t want to rip up our core. And if we can’t get anyone on a good deal, then just run it back.


Naz is the only semi realistic of that group but he could easily re-sign with the Wolves if they prioritize him. The Rockets have a glut of forwards, might be able to get one from them but none of those guys really move the needle.
I think Markannen would be the best fit but the combination of contract and asking price makes it unrealistic.
Hard to see any realistic options that really move the needle tbh.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,986
And1: 1,950
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#51 » by Canadafan » Thu May 8, 2025 6:12 pm

the_l_train wrote:
Rip32 wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
Yessss. I'd luv to get Portis. He hates Indy for one. He's tough , shoots well and is only 30. Perfect backup to split minutes with Tobias.
If Bucks trade Giannis, there's zero reason for them to hold onto him. Even if he just picks up his player option, I'd definitely take him on .
Would be fun for us to keep that Toeonto 2nd though. Give us a little excitement at draft time to pick a prospect.
Jake Laravia i definitely do not know anything about him though :-?

No thanks to Portis! I'd rather rely on Harris so at least Harris shoots and he can post up. Portis is a fake wanna be tough guy who just shoots threes. I want us to stay away from specialist or sign them cheap


Portis is a guy you hate to play, but love him if he is on your team.

If the asking price is only Fontechio/Sasser and future protected picks --- its a no-brainer for our current situation. Instant fan favorite, and a stretch big is our exact need.

Dude was born to be a Piston, and Beef Stew/Portis/Holland would be an all-time "dark alley" guy lineup. Born killers.

Bucks fans love him so much they might wind up keeping him for that alone --- losing Giannis and Portis in the same summer might make the fan base turn on them. They are in desperate need of draft picks though, and lets hope they completely blow it up.


Love that. My thoughts exactly.
Also to your above post about GHill. That **** pissed me off too. Gtfoh Hill pfft
SuperBad
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 07, 2020
         

Re: PF targets 

Post#52 » by SuperBad » Thu May 8, 2025 8:13 pm

I would love Portis and Stew off the bench with Beasley and Schroeder and Holland that might be epic. Does anyone like the idea of somehow sending Ivey to Chicago, they send Vuch and something to GS and we take Kuminga. I don’t if I’m sold myself but it’s a solid alternative there.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,626
And1: 22,758
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#53 » by MotownMadness » Thu May 8, 2025 8:23 pm

SuperBad wrote:I would love Portis and Stew off the bench with Beasley and Schroeder and Holland that might be epic. Does anyone like the idea of somehow sending Ivey to Chicago, they send Vuch and something to GS and we take Kuminga. I don’t if I’m sold myself but it’s a solid alternative there.

Kuminga kinda sucks
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,791
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: PF targets 

Post#54 » by the_l_train » Thu May 8, 2025 8:25 pm

SuperBad wrote:I would love Portis and Stew off the bench with Beasley and Schroeder and Holland that might be epic. Does anyone like the idea of somehow sending Ivey to Chicago, they send Vuch and something to GS and we take Kuminga. I don’t if I’m sold myself but it’s a solid alternative there.


Scares me that Steve Kerr has absolutely no faith in Kuminga...would rather keep Ivey since his ceiling seems way higher.

I think we could get Kuminga for way less than that, and wouldn't hate taking a flyer on him if that is the case. They may even bite on Fontechio/Sasser and a 2nd.
User avatar
Rip32
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,448
And1: 284
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: PF targets 

Post#55 » by Rip32 » Thu May 8, 2025 8:40 pm

NYPiston wrote:
theBigLip wrote:Looking forward, seems like a good shooting PF is what we need. Harris has been above expectations, but we need a long term solution. So what’s your ranked target list?

Mine is something like this:
Giannis
Bam
Naz
Porzingis
KD

I don’t mind giving up draft picks, but don’t want to rip up our core. And if we can’t get anyone on a good deal, then just run it back.


Naz is the only semi realistic of that group but he could easily re-sign with the Wolves if they prioritize him. The Rockets have a glut of forwards, might be able to get one from them but none of those guys really move the needle.
I think Markannen would be the best fit but the combination of contract and asking price makes it unrealistic.
Hard to see any realistic options that really move the needle tbh.

So do the Wolves sign Naz over J. Randle?? I'm not so sure. If Tobias is making 25 mil, Naz could get about 27 mil
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
User avatar
Rip32
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,448
And1: 284
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: PF targets 

Post#56 » by Rip32 » Thu May 8, 2025 8:43 pm

the_l_train wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
the_l_train wrote:
Love it.

Out of all the somewhat “realistic” outcomes this offseason, getting Portis in a trade like this, bringing back Beas/Shroder on team friendly deals, then signing Jake Laravia would be an A+.


Yessss. I'd luv to get Portis. He hates Indy for one. He's tough , shoots well and is only 30. Perfect backup to split minutes with Tobias.
If Bucks trade Giannis, there's zero reason for them to hold onto him. Even if he just picks up his player option, I'd definitely take him on .
Would be fun for us to keep that Toeonto 2nd though. Give us a little excitement at draft time to pick a prospect.
Jake Laravia i definitely do not know anything about him though :-?




On Jake Laravia, here is how my Grizzlies fan buddy described him:

"Glue guy, connector --- not great at anything, but good at everything. Offense was getting more consistent before we traded him."

Can play PF and SF, and I look at him as a younger (cheaper?) Fontechio replacement. Hoping he would actually wear #33 for us as well --- Grant Hill is basically dead to me after seemingly rooting for the Knicks in every playoff game he announced.

I agree! F?ck Uncle Tom Grant Hill! He was never a real Piston imo
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,791
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: PF targets 

Post#57 » by the_l_train » Thu May 8, 2025 8:43 pm

Rip32 wrote:
NYPiston wrote:
theBigLip wrote:Looking forward, seems like a good shooting PF is what we need. Harris has been above expectations, but we need a long term solution. So what’s your ranked target list?

Mine is something like this:
Giannis
Bam
Naz
Porzingis
KD

I don’t mind giving up draft picks, but don’t want to rip up our core. And if we can’t get anyone on a good deal, then just run it back.


Naz is the only semi realistic of that group but he could easily re-sign with the Wolves if they prioritize him. The Rockets have a glut of forwards, might be able to get one from them but none of those guys really move the needle.
I think Markannen would be the best fit but the combination of contract and asking price makes it unrealistic.
Hard to see any realistic options that really move the needle tbh.

So do the Wolves sign Naz over J. Randle?? I'm not so sure. If Tobias is making 25 mil, Naz could get about 27 mil


1 million percent. The whole idea of trading KAT was to keep Naz.
User avatar
Rip32
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,448
And1: 284
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: PF targets 

Post#58 » by Rip32 » Thu May 8, 2025 8:47 pm

the_l_train wrote:
Rip32 wrote:
NYPiston wrote:
Naz is the only semi realistic of that group but he could easily re-sign with the Wolves if they prioritize him. The Rockets have a glut of forwards, might be able to get one from them but none of those guys really move the needle.
I think Markannen would be the best fit but the combination of contract and asking price makes it unrealistic.
Hard to see any realistic options that really move the needle tbh.

So do the Wolves sign Naz over J. Randle?? I'm not so sure. If Tobias is making 25 mil, Naz could get about 27 mil


1 million percent. The whole idea of trading KAT was to keep Naz.

So you have
Ant = Supermax
Gobert - max
Randle near max
Naz

That's a lot of money in 4 players
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,791
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: PF targets 

Post#59 » by the_l_train » Thu May 8, 2025 9:04 pm

Rip32 wrote:
the_l_train wrote:
Rip32 wrote:So do the Wolves sign Naz over J. Randle?? I'm not so sure. If Tobias is making 25 mil, Naz could get about 27 mil


1 million percent. The whole idea of trading KAT was to keep Naz.

So you have
Ant = Supermax
Gobert - max
Randle near max
Naz

That's a lot of money in 4 players


Randle is a one year rental.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,626
And1: 22,758
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#60 » by MotownMadness » Fri May 9, 2025 5:04 pm

Pelicans need to blow it up and give us one of Herb Jones or Trey Murphy.

Just play Ausar at the 4

Return to Detroit Pistons