LuckyGreen7 wrote:Well, I love the Celtics, but I also could use a grand. So I'm in the thread now.
posting for a shot at 1K. I too accept.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
LuckyGreen7 wrote:Well, I love the Celtics, but I also could use a grand. So I'm in the thread now.
Tyakack wrote:OldCeltics wrote:Guys Celtics are not just better than Knicks, its not even close. Its like a top 5 NBA team against a college team. The problem is they up by 20 points in game 1 and 2, and are so disrespectful to Knicks that they just coasted, pure arrogance.
But if the Celtics locked in, they would blow them out 20 each game. Just need to play 48 minutes.
If Knicks win this series i will give each person in this thread 1k each. It just wont happen. 0% chance. This promise applies off course if no major injuries to Tatum/Brown/Porzingis/White.
Go Knicks!
Wargreymon wrote:Posting for 1K. I'll take payment in And1s too if cash is a problem.
PhilBlackson wrote:Celtics are prob gonna Gentleman's Sweep now.
AussieCeltic wrote:Lalouie wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:
Yes I watched those games just as I did this one. Celtics shot 25% from 3 in both of those games.
When you made the comment, it was in the 4th quarter just after Pritchard hit a 3. The Celtics were 1/1 in that quarter at that point and shooting over 50% from 3 as a team at that point. They finished 20/40.
I thought about 35 of the 40 threes today were good looks. Why would you turn down open looks when you’re shooting the ball well? Completely different to the first 2 games where they couldn’t hit them.
there is always a potential to shoot yourself in the foot with 3s at any given time
if you are ahead by 30 and for the rest of the game you shoot only twenty five 2s youll'll prolly get 25 sure pts and that doesn't include free throws. so the 30 pt lead in reality ends up being an impossible 55 point deficit for nky to ovrrcome in a little over one quarter left,,,,,and you didn't even breal a sweat.
in fact let LET NYK shoot themselves in the foot trying to mount a comeback. for every 3 they make at best, you still are countering with the better % 2 - that's a "1pt at a time" comeback on a 55point deficit
I see math isn’t a strong point of yours
Black Jack wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:Celtics are prob gonna Gentleman's Sweep now.
if that happens NYK are almost certain to try to pull off another big trade this summer
OldCeltics wrote:Guys Celtics are not just better than Knicks, its not even close. Its like a top 5 NBA team against a college team. The problem is they up by 20 points in game 1 and 2, and are so disrespectful to Knicks that they just coasted, pure arrogance.
But if the Celtics locked in, they would blow them out 20 each game. Just need to play 48 minutes.
If Knicks win this series i will give each person in this thread 1k each. It just wont happen. 0% chance. This promise applies off course if no major injuries to Tatum/Brown/Porzingis/White.
NoStatsGuy wrote:Black Jack wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:Celtics are prob gonna Gentleman's Sweep now.
if that happens NYK are almost certain to try to pull off another big trade this summer
dont know if thats happening.. but i know if brunson gets defended like he is in the playoffs so far, we wont go far with this team. if we had a giannis the game would be a different game. im usually against this mentality to do overrreaction trades, trading the farm, whatever you wanna call it. but i think we need a giannis caliber player to compete.
the series isnt over but these playoffs especially our offense is unwatchable. and OKC and Boston arent going anywhere in the near future.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.