Post#74 » by vvoland » Sat May 17, 2025 4:36 pm
Youre saying kerr played jk with Steph/dray plenty. I'm saying 600 possessions is just under 6 games and that's all the minutes he's played with Steph and dray in the ~60 games they were all healthy this year. I'm sorry, that's neither "enough" nor plenty. Even more frustrating, the lineups that make the most intuitive sense only saw 24 possessions together, ALL YEAR.
Don't move the goalposts. We're not saying he's Kobe or is worth $Xm/yr. I'm saying he improves the performance of our best players, he's part of our best lineups, and even if you don't believe in net rating, what other metric do you want to use to measure his on-court impact?
Sure, we were a .500 team with him but it wasn't because of the lineups where he played with Steph and dray. In fact, those three played at a level that would have been historically great if it was over a full season (+9 net rating). The difference between +7.1 (what Steph/dray had without jk) and 9.1 is massive (~30% improvement).
I show you the lineup numbers this season. Spree expanded it to a 4 year sample. Beyond the eye test, what do you need to see to think jk would fit with Steph/dray? We've been told he doesn't, I mostly believed Kerr, until I looked at the lineup data. It's pretty conclusive and, as someone who works with data, if I got that type of impact from 1 change, I'd get promoted.