TheRaptor! wrote:rapz101 wrote:Matty wrote:
See its **** like this that makes me think certain members in this forum should get banned from posting.
What the **** has Booker won as a No.1 option? a ticket to the finals? and you think he's a better fit than Giannis, the one who prevented him from winning a ring?
You really think a Booker-led team is going to win a title?!
Why’s this dude so angry tho? Lmao.
You just posted that Booker isn’t fit as a number 1 option because we haven’t seen him win a chip as a number 1 option.
Oka, by that logic what makes Ingram any better? Because we need to give him a chance first before we label him unfit? If he was, the pelicans would’ve made him that over Zion or anyone else on that team, but they didn’t. And he’s also injured a lot. So even if he is THAT good, dude hasn’t been available enough to show it, so there’s that.
Yet you post that Ingram should deserve that chance and that their is a possibility he becomes that type of player for us.
I’m not even for or against booker or ingram as our lead guy for now, but i’m not understanding your goal post. If you’re giannis or bust, just say that.
We got him for peanuts
That’s fair, but in a vacuum, all variables aside, is Devin Booker not better than ingram?
I’d say yes, booker is better. So if the raptors actually had a chance of turning ingram into Devin booker for similar ‘peanuts’, you do it and not bicker about Booker not being a true number 1, because Ingram isn’t either (by the same logic).
But otherwise, yes, I agree Ingram was a good get and I’m glad we got him for ‘peanuts’.