jayjaysee wrote:ACMFFL wrote:I think any deal that adds max player to Dallas is DOA unless Davis is involved in the deal.
Imho you can't build a functional team around 3 supermax players anymore.
That might be the normal case, but this Dallas team isn’t functional.
But Beal is only a two year max. After that he will be no where close to that. And during those two years, Dallas has good and cheap production out of Lively, Naji, Christie, and hopefully Flagg obviously. So the depth chart can be a little top heavy.
And I can’t see Kyrie getting a 30% max a definitely not a super max. With his injury I’d be surprised if he was a 25% max. I’d hope Dallas’ offer is more like 3yr130–140 or 4yr170-180?
Yeah but after winning the lottery they have the unique opportunity to build a functional team.
If they are still looking to compete, it doesn't make sense to eat Beal contract cause he would destroy their depth and imho it's not worth the candle for 2 mid/late 1sts.
On the other hand it's more reasonable to take on Beal contract (+assets attached) if Mavs want to hit the reset button by trading away AD.
Agreed on Kyrie, 3/140 should be enough, but even then I still don't think they can afford to add another supermax contract, big3 formula is a recipe of a disaster in this new CBA era.




















