Magic_Johnny12 wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:longfellow44 wrote:If Black is a good point guard prospect then why isn't orlando excited to keep him and develop him when they have such a need at point guard?
Because they need to give up assets to acquire a player as good as, as you say he is, Malik Monk.
You said teams should pay for Malik Monk. I have Orlando trading a decent PG prospect and a late 1st for him. That's a decent haul for a 5th starter![]()
It also balances the Kings and gives them depth.
With the apron and Orlando’s future finances, trading Black has to make a lot of sense (bigger fish).
Orlando could get a similar player that fits the role Monk will be asked to play for assets outside of Black imo.
Again, this is not saying he’s untouchable but don’t think Monk nor his archetype is the target for a Black centered trade.
I don't agree trading Black needs to be for bigger fish.
Locking in a 4th/5th starter or elite 6th man on Monks contract fills a lot of holes for Orlando.
I agree Black may not be needed here and the assets can be utilized elsewhere.
Maybe it's easier to do Isaac/Howard/#25 for Monk, or something similar.