Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#21 » by ReggiesKnicks » Wed May 21, 2025 4:35 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
longfellow44 wrote:If Black is a good point guard prospect then why isn't orlando excited to keep him and develop him when they have such a need at point guard?


Because they need to give up assets to acquire a player as good as, as you say he is, Malik Monk.

You said teams should pay for Malik Monk. I have Orlando trading a decent PG prospect and a late 1st for him. That's a decent haul for a 5th starter :dontknow:

It also balances the Kings and gives them depth.


With the apron and Orlando’s future finances, trading Black has to make a lot of sense (bigger fish).

Orlando could get a similar player that fits the role Monk will be asked to play for assets outside of Black imo.

Again, this is not saying he’s untouchable but don’t think Monk nor his archetype is the target for a Black centered trade.


I don't agree trading Black needs to be for bigger fish.

Locking in a 4th/5th starter or elite 6th man on Monks contract fills a lot of holes for Orlando.

I agree Black may not be needed here and the assets can be utilized elsewhere.

Maybe it's easier to do Isaac/Howard/#25 for Monk, or something similar.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,821
And1: 13,773
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#22 » by Godaddycurse » Wed May 21, 2025 4:39 pm

i think Monk is worth 25 or Black, not both. Orlando should send out more salary so they are not hardcapped at 1st apron
Think Okoro for Bitadze makes more sense for Cleveland
Magic_Johnny12
RealGM
Posts: 12,416
And1: 10,001
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Contact:
         

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#23 » by Magic_Johnny12 » Wed May 21, 2025 4:44 pm

I don't agree trading Black needs to be for bigger fish.


Orlando has limited *tangible assets. Outside of distant picks Black might be Orlando’s highest valued asset. Trading him prematurely for a backup PG shooting 32% from 3 doesn’t seem like the best asset management and before you or anyone else says it Monk IS a backup PG for as long as KCP is on this team.

Maybe it's easier to do Isaac/Howard/#25 for Monk, or something similar.


Yes, this makes A LOT more sense.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#24 » by penbeast0 » Wed May 21, 2025 4:45 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
Well duh, they’re starting Cory Joseph for crying out loud :lol:

Coby White/Collin Sexton/Anfernee Simons are all similar players, all putrid defenders and all can theoretically score. All are available and all should cost a lot less than this.

However and ultimately, Orlando needs shooting and Monk shooting 32% from 3 isn’t exactly what they need in a PG.

Is he an upgrade over what they have currently? Absolutely, no question. Is he worth Black, Goga and a FRP? Absolutely not (imho).


Don't forget Jordan Poole who (to my shock) probably had a better defensive year than any of the 3 and is also a ball dominant scoring point with above league average efficiency. His value is also still depressed from being the second most tankeriffic player in the NBA the previous year (Hi Scoot) so you might be able to get him at a reasonable price.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Magic_Johnny12
RealGM
Posts: 12,416
And1: 10,001
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Contact:
         

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#25 » by Magic_Johnny12 » Wed May 21, 2025 4:51 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
Well duh, they’re starting Cory Joseph for crying out loud :lol:

Coby White/Collin Sexton/Anfernee Simons are all similar players, all putrid defenders and all can theoretically score. All are available and all should cost a lot less than this.

However and ultimately, Orlando needs shooting and Monk shooting 32% from 3 isn’t exactly what they need in a PG.

Is he an upgrade over what they have currently? Absolutely, no question. Is he worth Black, Goga and a FRP? Absolutely not (imho).


Don't forget Jordan Poole who (to my shock) probably had a better defensive year than any of the 3 and is also a ball dominant scoring point with above league average efficiency. His value is also still depressed from being the second most tankeriffic player in the NBA the previous year (Hi Scoot) so you might be able to get him at a reasonable price.


Yup, his name is mentioned ever so often. He also has Michigan connections (Wagner bros, Houstan, Howard) so it kinda makes sense but his contract makes things a little difficult. You would have to be certain he could be the difference maker. High risk/high reward kinda move, not sure Orlando is that kind of position just yet.
User avatar
MartinsIzAfraud
Head Coach
Posts: 6,435
And1: 4,819
Joined: Mar 07, 2017
Location: Work
   

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#26 » by MartinsIzAfraud » Wed May 21, 2025 4:59 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
longfellow44 wrote:If Black is a good point guard prospect then why isn't orlando excited to keep him and develop him when they have such a need at point guard?


Because they need to give up assets to acquire a player as good as, as you say he is, Malik Monk.

You said teams should pay for Malik Monk. I have Orlando trading a decent PG prospect and a late 1st for him. That's a decent haul for a 5th starter :dontknow:

It also balances the Kings and gives them depth.

black isn't even a PG outside of on paper, he's more like a 3&d wing player. Corey Joseph started more games later in the year because he could get Orlando into sets and keep the ball moving.

do agree with Johnny though, no way I'm giving up Black and a 1st for Monk. Rather hold onto black for a bigger fish and pray Orlando's FO find a way to move 16 Cole, Gary/Jett/other dudes for Simons/Sexton type of guard.
A scoring guard.. never heard of one. :roll:
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#27 » by ReggiesKnicks » Wed May 21, 2025 5:00 pm

MartinsIzAfraud wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
longfellow44 wrote:If Black is a good point guard prospect then why isn't orlando excited to keep him and develop him when they have such a need at point guard?


Because they need to give up assets to acquire a player as good as, as you say he is, Malik Monk.

You said teams should pay for Malik Monk. I have Orlando trading a decent PG prospect and a late 1st for him. That's a decent haul for a 5th starter :dontknow:

It also balances the Kings and gives them depth.

black isn't even a PG outside of on paper, he's more like a 3&d wing player. Corey Joseph started more games later in the year because he could get Orlando into sets and keep the ball moving.


Alright then replace PG with versatile ball-handler who is a good defender :lol:
tcheco
Starter
Posts: 2,097
And1: 1,434
Joined: Jan 15, 2015

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#28 » by tcheco » Wed May 21, 2025 5:36 pm

Dont see any of the teams doing it.
Orlando gets Monk, 17ppg 43/32 splits with 2/1 assist/TO ratio, not great considering the potencial in Black(who is already a better defender than Monk) and their pick and their backup big... I think they should aim higher than that honestly. Monk is a solid sixth man that can score league averages... Not terrible, specially his cheap contract, but Magic is not a Monk away from going for the title.

Also Kings are rebuilding? Cause thats the only reason to get Black(whilst already having Devin Carter), Magic core is young enough to afford to wait on Black developing, Kings have Lavine and Sabonis who will be at the end of their prime when Black is entering his prime.

Cavs also need Max Struss shooting way more than a backup, Hunter does not provide that, also they wont have any flexibility money wise to land a shooter
cavsfanatic
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 81
Joined: Jan 06, 2020

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#29 » by cavsfanatic » Wed May 21, 2025 5:50 pm

Couldn't a trade like this help Cavs get out of the second apron? They might have to add some second rounders to Okoro to get under.
That would be an added benefit and I would consider this seriously.
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,021
And1: 235
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#30 » by longfellow44 » Wed May 21, 2025 5:54 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
I don't agree trading Black needs to be for bigger fish.


Orlando has limited *tangible assets. Outside of distant picks Black might be Orlando’s highest valued asset. Trading him prematurely for a backup PG shooting 32% from 3 doesn’t seem like the best asset management and before you or anyone else says it Monk IS a backup PG for as long as KCP is on this team.

Maybe it's easier to do Isaac/Howard/#25 for Monk, or something similar.


Yes, this makes A LOT more sense.

Isaac and his 15 minutes a game do not make sense for the kings. If you can find a 3 party team to send the kings value instead of Isaac then maybe there could be something there. But the fact that he can't find more minutes on his current teams tells me all I need to know about his ability to stay on the court.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,740
And1: 35,812
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#31 » by jbk1234 » Wed May 21, 2025 6:07 pm

cavsfanatic wrote:Couldn't a trade like this help Cavs get out of the second apron? They might have to add some second rounders to Okoro to get under.
That would be an added benefit and I would consider this seriously.


If the Cavs traded Strus and Okoro for minimal salary coming back, they could duck the second apron assuming they let both Ty and Merrill walk. At that point, you're down one starter and three rotation players before you've made your trade.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
cavsfanatic
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 81
Joined: Jan 06, 2020

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#32 » by cavsfanatic » Wed May 21, 2025 6:18 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
cavsfanatic wrote:Couldn't a trade like this help Cavs get out of the second apron? They might have to add some second rounders to Okoro to get under.
That would be an added benefit and I would consider this seriously.


If the Cavs traded Strus and Okoro for minimal salary coming back, they could duck the second apron assuming they let both Ty and Merrill walk. At that point, you're down one starter and three rotation players before you've made your trade.

Goga would be a rotation player,,then i think you have a reset of sorts with your bench. 25 could be used to bring another player in,,,it would take a lot of tinkering. I'm personally bringing back Merrill at a minimum and Jerome was so exposed in the playoffs i'm not breaking the bank for him.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,740
And1: 35,812
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#33 » by jbk1234 » Wed May 21, 2025 6:37 pm

cavsfanatic wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
cavsfanatic wrote:Couldn't a trade like this help Cavs get out of the second apron? They might have to add some second rounders to Okoro to get under.
That would be an added benefit and I would consider this seriously.


If the Cavs traded Strus and Okoro for minimal salary coming back, they could duck the second apron assuming they let both Ty and Merrill walk. At that point, you're down one starter and three rotation players before you've made your trade.

Goga would be a rotation player,,then i think you have a reset of sorts with your bench. 25 could be used to bring another player in,,,it would take a lot of tinkering. I'm personally bringing back Merrill at a minimum and Jerome was so exposed in the playoffs i'm not breaking the bank for him.


If there's a three team deal that brings back Goga and sends out Okoro, I'd probably consider it. I'm completely off the train at Strus for cap space though. Strus is a solid, two-way player worth every bit of his contract.

I think Merrill gets more than the minimum on the open market. Like Delly, there's definitely a price point at which I wish him well. I go back and forth on Ty at the league average exception. Next summer is a much better time for the Cavs to make a big move.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,139
And1: 29,325
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#34 » by Knightro » Wed May 21, 2025 7:38 pm

Anthony Black, Goga Bitadze and a late first for Malik Monk?

That feels like too much.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,349
And1: 8,413
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#35 » by Skybox » Wed May 21, 2025 7:46 pm

I'm ok with #16 and Goga for Monk but not Black...he's got way too much upside and he's already a lockdown defender with great positional size.

ORL could really use a guy like Monk (or Simons or Sexton or Coby White or McCollum...) but if they really targeted Monk and AB was a deal-breaker...I'd do it with no picks attached.

so, Goga, Cole Anthony & 16 for Monk

or, Goga, Black & Harris straight up for Monk
facothomas22
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 2,177
Joined: Jul 02, 2018
   

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#36 » by facothomas22 » Wed May 21, 2025 8:20 pm

The Kings should lean more towards getting draft capital package if they're making trades,instead of going after win now talent.They're nowhere contending for anything of significance. I think the Cavaliers should be cut with the Kings getting the 25th pick in the draft instead.
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 1,907
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#37 » by orlando_joe » Wed May 21, 2025 8:53 pm

i can not help myself to stay away from this board...almost everything looks like magic give more to get less..i know homer but man
i just do not see monk as this great player that is worth 3 positive assets\

edit
just read some more...if sky thinks its to much you know this is off...lol
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,872
And1: 12,009
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#38 » by LightTheBeam » Wed May 21, 2025 9:39 pm

I love the idea of Monk for Black type of deal for both teams.

Cleveland not really necessary here. I like the idea of finding a forward for Sac. What could we do with Demar + JV + 25 while keeping Goga?
tidho
General Manager
Posts: 9,621
And1: 3,161
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#39 » by tidho » Fri May 23, 2025 9:48 am

So CLE is trading a guy that (shouldn't but does) start for them, for a guy that will be the 3rd big (who ORL didn't even play in the playoffs). Seems off. CLE does save a lot of money, if this gets them under the 2nd apron then maybe it's worth doing to facilitate something else. On it's own, seems like there will be other options. Not ignoring the pick, but Koby is incapable of finding a rotation caliber player outside the top 10, so pretty useless in CLE's hands.
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 9,898
And1: 2,552
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Cleveland & Orlando & Sacramento 

Post#40 » by mcfly1204 » Fri May 23, 2025 2:06 pm

tidho wrote:So CLE is trading a guy that (shouldn't but does) start for them, for a guy that will be the 3rd big (who ORL didn't even play in the playoffs). Seems off. CLE does save a lot of money, if this gets them under the 2nd apron then maybe it's worth doing to facilitate something else. On it's own, seems like there will be other options. Not ignoring the pick, but Koby is incapable of finding a rotation caliber player outside the top 10, so pretty useless in CLE's hands.

I'd also argue that Cleveland would be losing toughness that they sorely lack. You move Strus, and who is out there with physical play on the wing?
Well at least we're not Detroit!

Return to Trades and Transactions