NYKat wrote:rajajackal wrote:when everybody was in kumbaya mode before the game i had a vision of what it might look like in here if we lost. pretty accurate
Sky is falling after Game 1
Sky has fallen. Past tense.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

NYKat wrote:rajajackal wrote:when everybody was in kumbaya mode before the game i had a vision of what it might look like in here if we lost. pretty accurate
Sky is falling after Game 1
nedleeds wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:The NBA All-Defensive teams were announced earlier today. OG rightfully made neither team.
He is getting paid 212 million to be an elite defender for this team, and he simply hasn't been that this year.
I think he has been a disappointment this season, particularly on defense, where he has been solid, but not great. He falls well below Caruso, the Thompson twins, Draymond or Gobert in defensive impact.
He also hasn't been good in these playoffs. The Knicks have been 24.8 points per 100 possessions worse with him on the court. This isn't just statistical noise, the value is too extreme to be meaningless.
So back to game 1, he completely blows a defensive coverage on a key possession in the last minute of regulation, he blows a wide open layup earlier in the 4th quarter, he turns the ball over at a pivotal moment, and he's the one to throw a tantrum during the timeout? I also saw him ignoring a dap attempt by KAT when the Knicks were up big, leaving him hanging at midcourt.
He's giving off weird vibes, I'm sorry.
I hope he bounces back in game 2, but I think he may become a question mark for the offseason if he doesn't step up. I'm hoping he does.
Yes or no, the only non rookie scale contract on the Knicks that would net a positive return is Jalen Brunson?
whocares1 wrote:nedleeds wrote:whocares1 wrote:
there’s not a coach in the league that doesn’t put in their star in that situation. .
There's one coach in the league capable of being up 14 with 3:44 left to go and losing. It's meteor level improbable. You have to be such a stubborn slow thinking orc to even give it a run.
And yet that isolated situation wasn’t the reason they blew a whole 14 point lead. There were numerous of things that went wrong. You can claim that’s when it all started but in reality a couple of contests and made free throws and we aren’t arguing about a historic loss.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
rajajackal wrote:
since when did mikal start sounding like a leader on this team? knicks in 5

ctorres wrote:rajajackal wrote:
since when did mikal start sounding like a leader on this team? knicks in 5
He was the only guy who was relaxed during the squabble on the bench in the 4th quarter among OG, KAT, and Brunson. I liked that.


KnicksGod wrote:NYKat wrote:rajajackal wrote:when everybody was in kumbaya mode before the game i had a vision of what it might look like in here if we lost. pretty accurate
Sky is falling after Game 1
Sky has fallen. Past tense.


HerSports85 wrote:



whocares1 wrote:
Just dunk the ball…


HarthorneWingo wrote:Now that I was able to recover emotionally from last night’s game, i have a couple thoughts:
1. We didn’t “choke”. The Pacers went nuts with 3s at the end of the game and Haliburton had his lucky 3. That’s not a choke job. Give the Pacers some credit. That said, Naismith won’t go off like that again.

Enzo954 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now that I was able to recover emotionally from last night’s game, i have a couple thoughts:
1. We didn’t “choke”. The Pacers went nuts with 3s at the end of the game and Haliburton had his lucky 3. That’s not a choke job. Give the Pacers some credit. That said, Naismith won’t go off like that again.
I give the Pacers tremendous credit, but we choked.