Mr B wrote:I’m reading a lot that the Mavs want to resign Kyrie this off season. He has a player option for $43.9M. Am I right in saying that’s his cap hold number?
How much do you think Kyrie is going to ask for? Would $35M per for 3 years be an insult to him?
What would Gafford have to make to consider keeping him?
Correct on Kyrie. When Luka was still with Mavs, the notion was Kyrie and Luka will both sign their max. Now that Kyrie has a bigger injury, speculations are that he will sign a longer contract but less money per year. So that would be a bit more helpful. But again, that is only speculation. No one ever knows what Kyrie will actually do. Mavs are probably going to be bidding against themselves again. And we know Nico likes handing out dumb contracts.
Regarding Gafford. I think it will be somewhere in the range of 15-20M, probably more around 15M (in my opinion). I would be VERY surprised if it is less. Though i also have to point out, a lot of people don't view Gafford as a starter, which could lower his value. But at the end of the day it's a free market....
joesha1698 wrote:So, the Kristaps Porziņģis trade, Jalen Brunson trade, signing and moving Grant Williams, and the Kuzma/Gafford moves all happened with Lindsey heavily involved — probably leading the charge. It’s unfair to pin all those on Nico alone.
See the answer from ACMFFL
joesha1698 wrote:Now, after Lindsey left, Nico had more autonomy. The Luka Dončić trade happened under Nico’s watch, so that responsibility falls mostly on him (though there may have been other pressures involved...which most sane people believe its was influenced by the owners/nba).
Not long ago it was reported that Dumont was getting more and more frustrated with Nico because he didn't know the impact of the trade. It was even reported that Dumont will hire another GM in advisory role "to help" Nico but in reality to report back to him because Dumont has no clue about basketball. He even had people spying on Doncic because Nico convinced him that he is taking a "vacation" when Nico's medical staff diagnosed wrong his injury.
joesha1698 wrote:Regarding Grimes, offering him a deal and him turning it down is normal. It’s speculative to say Nico “panicked” — player trade requests force the front office’s hand a lot. If he doesnt get something for Grimes, he most likely leaves and Dallas doesn't have a replacement piece. Grimes was all about building up his value for a big pay day, thus he was a rental.
If you seriously compete for a ring, sometimes the best outcome is to risk it and let a good role player walk after the season if you can't pay him enough. It happened with Lakers with Ariza when he left after they won a ring. Just as an example.