Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,153
- And1: 36,233
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Capn'O wrote:god shammgod wrote:Capn'O wrote:Retired mods can still issue suspensions. We just can't read your stupid reports and don't have to read your PMs.
It's the perfect severance package.
are reports and pm's common ? is it like a weekly or even daily occurrence ?
Boy howdy they are.
Ebbs and flows. But you can wake up to like 10 reports + a bunch of posts/PMs complaining about you not dealing with it while you were sleeping.
Reports complaining about reports? Sheesh
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Capn'O wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Capn'O wrote:The full Randle Experience:
https://www.si.com/nba/timberwolves/minnesota-timberwolves-news/i-don-t-know-julius-randle-sounds-lost-after-okc-shuts-him-down
![]()
Julius says this as if it were a different person entirely that he was trying to gauge and speculate about and not his damn self.![]()
He really needs to go full tilt and start referring to himself in the 3rd person.
"Sometimes you really can't say why Julius does what he does. But you've also gotta ask why Julius isn't getting the ball in rhythm early in the game."
Damn, even Bob Dylan is chiming in on Randle:
Look out kid
They keep it all hid
Better jump down a manhole
Light yourself a candle
Don’t wear sandals
Try to avoid the scandals
Don’t wanna be a bum
You better chew gum
The pump don’t work
’Cause the Randle took the handles
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,610
- And1: 5,742
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Deeeez Knicks
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 49,337
- And1: 55,323
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
8516knicks wrote:Considering the Wolves and Knicks are in pretty much the same condition right now, I'm curious what a poll of the board would be to the question:
Would you rather have Julius (admitting he's had 2 horrible shooting games) or KAT vs the Pacers? Does JR add anything we really need now vs. the Pacers? Muscle? Does he play better D than Kat?
1. Julius
2. KAT
3. "Meh - makes no difference."
and I guess I should add JR & DDV if the trade had not happend so...
4. Julius AND DDV
I was going to pick 3 till I remembered we'd also have DDV which would sway me to #4.
Curious for the board's takes on this.
Easily KAT.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Wildcat
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,918
- And1: 4,704
- Joined: Aug 07, 2002
- Location: Astoria, NY
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
8516knicks wrote:Considering the Wolves and Knicks are in pretty much the same condition right now, I'm curious what a poll of the board would be to the question:
Would you rather have Julius (admitting he's had 2 horrible shooting games) or KAT vs the Pacers? Does JR add anything we really need now vs. the Pacers? Muscle? Does he play better D than Kat?
1. Julius
2. KAT
3. "Meh - makes no difference."
and I guess I should add JR & DDV if the trade had not happend so...
4. Julius AND DDV
I was going to pick 3 till I remembered we'd also have DDV which would sway me to #4.
Curious for the board's takes on this.
Randle and DDV. This team desperately needs a secondary shot creator. Especially in the East. No one with T-Wolves looked good against the chosen ones. Knicks offense should not be THIS bad so deep into the playoffs. We were sold on record breaking nonsense that other teams suddenly knew how to scheme against.
Now, if we're talking about a different coach that gets the most out of KAT on offense, then let's talk. Right now, KAT/Thibs pairing sucks and it makes JB look bad, and I trust Randle far more to study film than I do on KAT.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,201
- And1: 57,766
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Wildcat wrote:8516knicks wrote:Considering the Wolves and Knicks are in pretty much the same condition right now, I'm curious what a poll of the board would be to the question:
Would you rather have Julius (admitting he's had 2 horrible shooting games) or KAT vs the Pacers? Does JR add anything we really need now vs. the Pacers? Muscle? Does he play better D than Kat?
1. Julius
2. KAT
3. "Meh - makes no difference."
and I guess I should add JR & DDV if the trade had not happend so...
4. Julius AND DDV
I was going to pick 3 till I remembered we'd also have DDV which would sway me to #4.
Curious for the board's takes on this.
Randle and DDV. This team desperately needs a secondary shot creator. Especially in the East. No one with T-Wolves looked good against the chosen ones. Knicks offense should not be THIS bad so deep into the playoffs. We were sold on record breaking nonsense that other teams suddenly knew how to scheme against.
Now, if we're talking about a different coach that gets the most out of KAT on offense, then let's talk. Right now, KAT/Thibs pairing sucks and it makes JB look bad, and I trust Randle far more to study film than I do on KAT.
We are averaging 118 ppg in the series so I’m not sure why the offense is the problem here, they are scoring enough to win these games and can’t get stops
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- sol537
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,383
- And1: 7,949
- Joined: Nov 07, 2001
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
It looks like Minny will either re-sign Randle to a long-term deal or let him walk... Either way, might go down as a major loss for them and DDV looks like he has one foot out of the door.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Wildcat
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,918
- And1: 4,704
- Joined: Aug 07, 2002
- Location: Astoria, NY
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
robillionaire wrote:Wildcat wrote:8516knicks wrote:Considering the Wolves and Knicks are in pretty much the same condition right now, I'm curious what a poll of the board would be to the question:
Would you rather have Julius (admitting he's had 2 horrible shooting games) or KAT vs the Pacers? Does JR add anything we really need now vs. the Pacers? Muscle? Does he play better D than Kat?
1. Julius
2. KAT
3. "Meh - makes no difference."
and I guess I should add JR & DDV if the trade had not happend so...
4. Julius AND DDV
I was going to pick 3 till I remembered we'd also have DDV which would sway me to #4.
Curious for the board's takes on this.
Randle and DDV. This team desperately needs a secondary shot creator. Especially in the East. No one with T-Wolves looked good against the chosen ones. Knicks offense should not be THIS bad so deep into the playoffs. We were sold on record breaking nonsense that other teams suddenly knew how to scheme against.
Now, if we're talking about a different coach that gets the most out of KAT on offense, then let's talk. Right now, KAT/Thibs pairing sucks and it makes JB look bad, and I trust Randle far more to study film than I do on KAT.
We are averaging 118 ppg in the series so I’m not sure why the offense is the problem here, they are scoring enough to win these games and can’t get stops
That's not saying much. Pacers' D is atrocious and the quicker you score, the quicker they score twice. That's the whole point to their offense.
Scoring enough to win games is the complacency we're stuck in. It's the fallacy we told ourselves earlier in the season to let us sleep at night. "Well, we can definitely out score people, so D is whatever." Not good enough.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
-
8516knicks
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,592
- And1: 6,483
- Joined: May 18, 2017
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Wildcat wrote:robillionaire wrote:Wildcat wrote:
Randle and DDV. This team desperately needs a secondary shot creator. Especially in the East. No one with T-Wolves looked good against the chosen ones. Knicks offense should not be THIS bad so deep into the playoffs. We were sold on record breaking nonsense that other teams suddenly knew how to scheme against.
Now, if we're talking about a different coach that gets the most out of KAT on offense, then let's talk. Right now, KAT/Thibs pairing sucks and it makes JB look bad, and I trust Randle far more to study film than I do on KAT.
We are averaging 118 ppg in the series so I’m not sure why the offense is the problem here, they are scoring enough to win these games and can’t get stops
That's not saying much. Pacers' D is atrocious and the quicker you score, the quicker they score twice. That's the whole point to their offense.
Scoring enough to win games is the complacency we're stuck in. It's the fallacy we told ourselves earlier in the season to let us sleep at night. "Well, we can definitely out score people, so D is whatever." Not good enough.
"...the quicker you score, the quicker they score twice." This. And doubly frustrating are the wide-open 3pt-nothing-but-net scores from Hali and Nesmith.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 90,748
- And1: 110,925
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:![]()
Julius says this as if it were a different person entirely that he was trying to gauge and speculate about and not his damn self.![]()
He really needs to go full tilt and start referring to himself in the 3rd person.
"Sometimes you really can't say why Julius does what he does. But you've also gotta ask why Julius isn't getting the ball in rhythm early in the game."
Damn, even Bob Dylan is chiming in on Randle:
Look out kid
They keep it all hid
Better jump down a manhole
Light yourself a candle
Don’t wear sandals
Try to avoid the scandals
Don’t wanna be a bum
You better chew gum
The pump don’t work
’Cause the Randle took the handles
That pump is right outside where I went to college. Allegedly.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Enzo954
- Starter
- Posts: 2,340
- And1: 3,636
- Joined: Jul 09, 2014
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Wildcat wrote:robillionaire wrote:Wildcat wrote:
Randle and DDV. This team desperately needs a secondary shot creator. Especially in the East. No one with T-Wolves looked good against the chosen ones. Knicks offense should not be THIS bad so deep into the playoffs. We were sold on record breaking nonsense that other teams suddenly knew how to scheme against.
Now, if we're talking about a different coach that gets the most out of KAT on offense, then let's talk. Right now, KAT/Thibs pairing sucks and it makes JB look bad, and I trust Randle far more to study film than I do on KAT.
We are averaging 118 ppg in the series so I’m not sure why the offense is the problem here, they are scoring enough to win these games and can’t get stops
That's not saying much. Pacers' D is atrocious and the quicker you score, the quicker they score twice. That's the whole point to their offense.
Scoring enough to win games is the complacency we're stuck in. It's the fallacy we told ourselves earlier in the season to let us sleep at night. "Well, we can definitely out score people, so D is whatever." Not good enough.
Their defense has not been atrocious this series. Nesmith has Brunson shook.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,357
- And1: 56,908
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Randle would be turning the ball over against the Pacers at an ungodly rate. Y'all can't be serious. Dude is a loser that feasted on two teams that didn't have centers, the second he goes against a squad that has a perimeter defender on him and a shot blocker in the paint he turned right back into that same old quitter he has always been. His game 2 and 4 were all time awful, anyone still signing up for that is kidding themselves.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Wildcat
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,918
- And1: 4,704
- Joined: Aug 07, 2002
- Location: Astoria, NY
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Enzo954 wrote:Wildcat wrote:robillionaire wrote:
We are averaging 118 ppg in the series so I’m not sure why the offense is the problem here, they are scoring enough to win these games and can’t get stops
That's not saying much. Pacers' D is atrocious and the quicker you score, the quicker they score twice. That's the whole point to their offense.
Scoring enough to win games is the complacency we're stuck in. It's the fallacy we told ourselves earlier in the season to let us sleep at night. "Well, we can definitely out score people, so D is whatever." Not good enough.
Their defense has not been atrocious this series. Nesmith has Brunson shook.
Individual D is not good team D. D'ing up a stagnate offense that doesn't know how to swing the ball doesn't mean you have good D. D'ing up an ISO heavy set is not good D. Being allowed to play physical is not good D. Playing full court press is not good D, it's wear down D. Knicks after 2 freakin' series not understanding Pacers' game plan on JB is the problem. Full court, physicality. SGA is going to average 15+ FTs a game.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Enzo954
- Starter
- Posts: 2,340
- And1: 3,636
- Joined: Jul 09, 2014
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Wildcat wrote:Enzo954 wrote:Wildcat wrote:
That's not saying much. Pacers' D is atrocious and the quicker you score, the quicker they score twice. That's the whole point to their offense.
Scoring enough to win games is the complacency we're stuck in. It's the fallacy we told ourselves earlier in the season to let us sleep at night. "Well, we can definitely out score people, so D is whatever." Not good enough.
Their defense has not been atrocious this series. Nesmith has Brunson shook.
Individual D is not good team D. D'ing up a stagnate offense that doesn't know how to swing the ball doesn't mean you have good D. D'ing up an ISO heavy set is not good D. Being allowed to play physical is not good D. Playing full court press is not good D, it's wear down D. Knicks after 2 freakin' series not understanding Pacers' game plan on JB is the problem. Full court, physicality. SGA is going to average 15+ FTs a game.
I disagree. I think the Pacers D has been better than everyone in here was assuming it would be. How is playing full court press and physical defense not good D and only wear down D? Isn't wearing us down so we're frustrated, exhausted and less effective a winning defensive strategy? As a Knicks fan I hate saying this, but the Pacers D has been working on us for the most part. We're down 3-1 and the Pacers are 1 game away from being in the finals. You don't make it to the final dance with a team that has "Atrocious Defense" as you put it.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:![]()
He really needs to go full tilt and start referring to himself in the 3rd person.
"Sometimes you really can't say why Julius does what he does. But you've also gotta ask why Julius isn't getting the ball in rhythm early in the game."
Damn, even Bob Dylan is chiming in on Randle:
Look out kid
They keep it all hid
Better jump down a manhole
Light yourself a candle
Don’t wear sandals
Try to avoid the scandals
Don’t wanna be a bum
You better chew gum
The pump don’t work
’Cause the Randle took the handles
That pump is right outside where I went to college. Allegedly.
Zimmerman lore!
Once you get into Dylan it never leaves your system
As a snotty teenager I was like other know-nothings who say he can't sing. Then in my very early 20s I got hooked and played Bringing It Back Home only a million times
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 90,748
- And1: 110,925
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Damn, even Bob Dylan is chiming in on Randle:
Look out kid
They keep it all hid
Better jump down a manhole
Light yourself a candle
Don’t wear sandals
Try to avoid the scandals
Don’t wanna be a bum
You better chew gum
The pump don’t work
’Cause the Randle took the handles
That pump is right outside where I went to college. Allegedly.
Zimmerman lore!
Once you get into Dylan it never leaves your system
As a snotty teenager I was like other know-nothings who say he can't sing. Then in my very early 20s I got hooked and played Bringing It Back Home only a million times
Lends to some great covers too. Adele's "Make You Feel My Love" is fantastic. Then, obviously, there are the classics like Mr. Tambourine Man (Byrds) and All Along The Watchtower (Hendrix).
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- Gravy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,081
- And1: 9,540
- Joined: Jun 25, 2015
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
KAT for Randle looks like a lateral trade for both teams, we ended up in exactly the same place. This is the only time I can think of that ever happening.
Knicks could use more bench help and a replacement for what IHart gave us.
Knicks could use more bench help and a replacement for what IHart gave us.
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,357
- And1: 56,908
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Fat Kat wrote:
After his own turnover trying to do the spin a roonie.

KAT was flamed nonstop for dealing with a smaller player on him + shot blocker waiting, all the digs of "He can't post up Jrue/Harris lol" yet he averaged 20/10 and two series wins under those conditions. Randle was guarded by Caruso, Williams and Dort, 3 smaller players, why couldn't he dominate in the post? Don't answer because I will give it the same amount of rational thought yall gave to why KAT couldn't just post up a smaller player, you didn't want to hear the why, so I won't hear it either. Randle is ass, the second Randle has to face the same type of defense, he turned into who he always was, which is 17/5 with 3.6 turnovers per game to 3.0 apg, and -24.
It's no fun when the rabbit got the gun, huh?
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Hamsterdam (Ex-players, s***posts, beef, etc.) Continued
Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:
That pump is right outside where I went to college. Allegedly.
Zimmerman lore!
Once you get into Dylan it never leaves your system
As a snotty teenager I was like other know-nothings who say he can't sing. Then in my very early 20s I got hooked and played Bringing It Back Home only a million times
Lends to some great covers too. Adele's "Make You Feel My Love" is fantastic. Then, obviously, there are the classics like Mr. Tambourine Man (Byrds) and All Along The Watchtower (Hendrix).
That Hendrix version is a pinnacle 60s moment IMO.
Conversely,The Derek and The Dominoes cover of Hendrix's Little Wing is savage, brilliant and better than the original.













