OKC Sac
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
OKC Sac
-
- Kings Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 4,434
- And1: 1,808
- Joined: May 27, 2017
OKC Sac
Watching the finals.
OKC seems to lack a go to scorer other than SGA so they get a guy who can get a bucket.
To OKC: DeMar DeRozen.
To the Kings: Joe, Wallace, 15 in this draft
Why for OKC gives them a guy who can get a bucket.
Why for Kings: Gives them a defensive guard in Wallace and a pick in this draft
OKC seems to lack a go to scorer other than SGA so they get a guy who can get a bucket.
To OKC: DeMar DeRozen.
To the Kings: Joe, Wallace, 15 in this draft
Why for OKC gives them a guy who can get a bucket.
Why for Kings: Gives them a defensive guard in Wallace and a pick in this draft
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: OKC Sac
This is an incredible evaluation of DeMar. I wouldn't trade #15 or Wallace for him.
Joe + Williams + Future Mediocre 1st is already a decent offer.
Joe + Williams + Future Mediocre 1st is already a decent offer.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,790
- And1: 13,739
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: OKC Sac
i wouldnt trade for him period if i was OKC
Re: OKC Sac
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,363
- And1: 7,117
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: OKC Sac
There's some argument that OKC should add a bench bucket-getter (their bench guys are generally defense-first). The overall quality of the OKC guys means that they don't really need to be adding pick value or even their top value guys.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 824
- And1: 563
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
Re: OKC Sac
I'd be stunned if OKC offered any of that for DeRozan straight up, let alone packaged together.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,707
- And1: 2,415
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: OKC Sac
letsgobulls23 wrote:I'd be stunned if OKC offered any of that for DeRozan straight up, let alone packaged together.
I don’t think DD is the right target but a Dieng + Joe trade for him is reasonable.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,779
- And1: 5,465
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: OKC Sac
Godaddycurse wrote:i wouldnt trade for him period if i was OKC
OKC would be fools to take him for the minimum. Presti isn't a fool, so he would never dream of it.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,169
- And1: 821
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: OKC Sac
One_and_Done wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:i wouldnt trade for him period if i was OKC
OKC would be fools to take him for the minimum. Presti isn't a fool, so he would never dream of it.
Should DeRozan be in the NBA?
Re: OKC Sac
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,779
- And1: 5,465
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: OKC Sac
sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:i wouldnt trade for him period if i was OKC
OKC would be fools to take him for the minimum. Presti isn't a fool, so he would never dream of it.
Should DeRozan be in the NBA?
Sure. He serves a vital role; giving false hope to play-in teams while he puts up stats.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,169
- And1: 821
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: OKC Sac
One_and_Done wrote:sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:OKC would be fools to take him for the minimum. Presti isn't a fool, so he would never dream of it.
Should DeRozan be in the NBA?
Sure. He serves a vital role; giving false hope to play-in teams while he puts up stats.
Why are you not in an NBA front office? We need you running basketball ops out here
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,159
- And1: 10,827
- Joined: Jan 28, 2020
- Contact:
-
Re: OKC Sac
Nobody even wanted DeRozan before Sac signed him for no reason, but they're going to get a young starting point guard and the 15th overall pick for him?
No chance.
No chance.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,779
- And1: 5,465
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: OKC Sac
sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:sackings916 wrote:
Should DeRozan be in the NBA?
Sure. He serves a vital role; giving false hope to play-in teams while he puts up stats.
Why are you not in an NBA front office? We need you running basketball ops out here
How could I help? Your own GM doesn't run his front office either.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,169
- And1: 821
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: OKC Sac
One_and_Done wrote:sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Sure. He serves a vital role; giving false hope to play-in teams while he puts up stats.
Why are you not in an NBA front office? We need you running basketball ops out here
How could I help? Your own GM doesn't run his front office either.
My current GM? I’m not apart of a team sir. A basketball savant like yourself surely could run a team better than whichever GM you’re referring to.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,779
- And1: 5,465
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: OKC Sac
sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:sackings916 wrote:
Why are you not in an NBA front office? We need you running basketball ops out here
How could I help? Your own GM doesn't run his front office either.
My current GM? I’m not apart of a team sir. A basketball savant like yourself surely could run a team better than whichever GM you’re referring to.
It wouldn't take much to run the Kings better than Vivek, but we'll never know because every GM he hires has no real authority.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,169
- And1: 821
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: OKC Sac
One_and_Done wrote:sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:How could I help? Your own GM doesn't run his front office either.
My current GM? I’m not apart of a team sir. A basketball savant like yourself surely could run a team better than whichever GM you’re referring to.
It wouldn't take much to run the Kings better than Vivek, but we'll never know because every GM he hires has no real authority.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Dunning-Kruger effect
Re: OKC Sac
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,779
- And1: 5,465
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: OKC Sac
sackings916 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:sackings916 wrote:
My current GM? I’m not apart of a team sir. A basketball savant like yourself surely could run a team better than whichever GM you’re referring to.
It wouldn't take much to run the Kings better than Vivek, but we'll never know because every GM he hires has no real authority.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Dunning-Kruger effect
By that logic nobody can criticise Trump either. Sometimes a duck is just a duck. It's just as dangerous to think the Emperor has clothes as it is to overestimate yourself.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: OKC Sac
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,020
- And1: 233
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: OKC Sac
ReggiesKnicks wrote:This is an incredible evaluation of DeMar. I wouldn't trade #15 or Wallace for him.
Joe + Williams + Future Mediocre 1st is already a decent offer.
No that isn't a decent offer it's pretty terrible.
Demar is certainly worth more than that.
Re: OKC Sac
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 4,070
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: OKC Sac
Absolutely ridiculously in favor of Sacramento. Okc giving up better players, contracts, and a pick
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: OKC Sac
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,698
- And1: 2,177
- Joined: Jul 02, 2018
-
Re: OKC Sac
A massive overpay by the Thunder . Demar isn't worth ether the 15th pick or Cason Wallace, let alone both. I don't buy that Demar Derozen even has positive value at this point. This trade screams someone who significantly overrates their players that's on their team.
Re: OKC Sac
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,020
- And1: 233
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: OKC Sac
daoneandonly wrote:Absolutely ridiculously in favor of Sacramento. Okc giving up better players, contracts, and a pick
None of those players are better than derozan. Just because you like your role player doesn't suddenly make that player more valuable than someone like DeRozan. I understand that isolation players like derozan aren't as valuable as they used to be but come on let's be realistic about actual player impact and stop inflating players value just because they are good role players on a good team.
Return to Trades and Transactions