Knicks - Jazz

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#21 » by Knickfan1982 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:24 pm

Tim Lehrbach wrote:No talk of Sexton, really. Doesn't he help the Knicks with floor spacing and punch off the bench?



The problem is that if everyone is healthy both the guys the Knicks get would be helping us off the bench whereas Bridges is a starter. That's the biggest thing most people ignore about this deal.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,942
And1: 3,271
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#22 » by SkyHook » Mon Jun 16, 2025 11:13 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
Tim Lehrbach wrote:No talk of Sexton, really. Doesn't he help the Knicks with floor spacing and punch off the bench?



The problem is that if everyone is healthy both the guys the Knicks get would be helping us off the bench whereas Bridges is a starter. That's the biggest thing most people ignore about this deal.


The OP listed Towns as a 4 and I can't see starting Robinson over Kessler at the 5. Maybe that's part of the disconnect.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,377
And1: 2,894
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#23 » by Daddy 801 » Tue Jun 17, 2025 12:15 am

BK_2020 wrote:I have never heard anyone say the Jazz are ready to start contending. Until this thread.


It started with the introduction of our new GM Ainge Jr. He was asked if the Jazz would purposely tank. He said no and we would always put out a team to win and compete.

Of course he said that. No GM would say they are going to tank. People latched onto that and thought it meant we are in a win now trade for good player mode. We aren’t. All it signaled to Jazz fans who know what’s going on is that Clarkson, Sexton, Collins and possibly even Lauri will all be gone and we will lose because we are young and not play the fake injury weird lineup game we did this season.

This last year was year 1 of our tank. We’re gonna be a bottom five team at least the next two years. And probably still in the lottery in 3 years. After that we should in theory have enough young talent and hopefully some of it has matured well enough we can bring in vets.

The Jazz are probably the single best team to take on bad contracts like Dame and PG. My hope is we get both this season for draft capital and tell those guys to take the whole year off and podcast or whatever. Then they can be veteran leaders and if they show something in a season or two that a team starts to want them back on their team we can look to trade them or they can stay on the team and expire in X amount of years.

Long way of saying the Jazz aren’t looking to add a guy like Bridges. It would be a complete waste and I would be furious if we did something so stupid. So in a vacuum people can think Jazz fans are crazy for wanting to keep Kessler over Bridges but I agree 100%. We want young guys and unprotected FRP’s. That’s about it. No reason to add a guy like Bridges. Maybe in 3-4 years we start to make moves like that.
Knicks365247
Senior
Posts: 676
And1: 484
Joined: Apr 11, 2020

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#24 » by Knicks365247 » Tue Jun 17, 2025 5:22 am

Thanks Daddy (801) for the fatherly advice and intel on the Jazz.

Dame would definitely look good in purple on the sidelines.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,012
And1: 14,416
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#25 » by cgf » Tue Jun 17, 2025 12:42 pm

babyjax13 wrote:I think this is wrong directionally for us, but the value totally depends on Bridges' next contract. I think he is a 20 percent of the cap player which is about 30 million a year. I do not think that is how he feels.


He didn’t shoot the 3 well this year and he’s not as versatile as OG defensively. But his midrange game is money, he moves the ball well as a secondary creator, and he’s a fantastic guard / help defender.

That’s a player I’d have absolutely no qualms paying up to 40M a year…but less than OG + two years of cap-flation…and trust that his 3ball bounces back to his career averages. Especially with bargain we got from Brunson.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#26 » by Knickfan1982 » Thu Jun 19, 2025 8:25 pm

SkyHook wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
Tim Lehrbach wrote:No talk of Sexton, really. Doesn't he help the Knicks with floor spacing and punch off the bench?



The problem is that if everyone is healthy both the guys the Knicks get would be helping us off the bench whereas Bridges is a starter. That's the biggest thing most people ignore about this deal.


The OP listed Towns as a 4 and I can't see starting Robinson over Kessler at the 5. Maybe that's part of the disconnect.



The disconnect is that there is no way Kessler starts over a healthy Robinson. Kessler will get a lot of playing time when Robinson eventually gets hurt but a healthy Robinson is key to our team. His rebounding, his athleticism, the fact that he doesn't need the ball offensively and his shot blocking are far too important.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,942
And1: 3,271
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#27 » by SkyHook » Thu Jun 19, 2025 8:41 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
SkyHook wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:

The problem is that if everyone is healthy both the guys the Knicks get would be helping us off the bench whereas Bridges is a starter. That's the biggest thing most people ignore about this deal.


The OP listed Towns as a 4 and I can't see starting Robinson over Kessler at the 5. Maybe that's part of the disconnect.



The disconnect is that there is no way Kessler starts over a healthy Robinson. Kessler will get a lot of playing time when Robinson eventually gets hurt but a healthy Robinson is key to our team. His rebounding, his athleticism, the fact that he doesn't need the ball offensively and his shot blocking are far too important.


Okay, but this describes Kessler as well... except he's been better than Robinson at each of these aspects, both this season and throughout their careers. If the Knicks FO mindset is to value Kessler as a backup to Robinson, then any further discussion just isn't productive.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: Knicks - Jazz 

Post#28 » by Knickfan1982 » Thu Jun 19, 2025 10:10 pm

SkyHook wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
SkyHook wrote:
The OP listed Towns as a 4 and I can't see starting Robinson over Kessler at the 5. Maybe that's part of the disconnect.



The disconnect is that there is no way Kessler starts over a healthy Robinson. Kessler will get a lot of playing time when Robinson eventually gets hurt but a healthy Robinson is key to our team. His rebounding, his athleticism, the fact that he doesn't need the ball offensively and his shot blocking are far too important.


Okay, but this describes Kessler as well... except he's been better than Robinson at each of these aspects, both this season and throughout their careers. If the Knicks FO mindset is to value Kessler as a backup to Robinson, then any further discussion just isn't productive.


He had a really good year on a really bad team. Mitch has proven himself on playoff teams. Mitch's injury concerns are the only thing making this a consideration for me.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.

Return to Trades and Transactions