Stanford wrote:That's not a mock.
Projection. Yeah, my bad. Almost same description for me.
Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Stanford wrote:That's not a mock.
phifans wrote:youngcrev wrote:Ace and Cam Thomas ending up on the same team is gonna be hilarious. Sick tank potential. Especially with them being the big cap space team in a year with no free agents. They should collect assets as a trade facilitator taking on salary and tank hard.
If that's the case make sure we trade #3 for #8 and their own 26 first round pick.
Covi_Marsh wrote:phifans wrote:youngcrev wrote:Ace and Cam Thomas ending up on the same team is gonna be hilarious. Sick tank potential. Especially with them being the big cap space team in a year with no free agents. They should collect assets as a trade facilitator taking on salary and tank hard.
If that's the case make sure we trade #3 for #8 and their own 26 first round pick.
I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.
NYSixersFan wrote:quite simply, If I were GM, We would have a good young playoff team right now; with cap flexibility going forward
NYSixersFan wrote:I'D BE more then happy to debate you or anyone else on specifics
NYSixersFan wrote:How can I give you specifics? I'm not talking to other GM's
OleSchool wrote:Covi_Marsh wrote:phifans wrote:
If that's the case make sure we trade #3 for #8 and their own 26 first round pick.
I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.
How does the pick we owe the Nets work? 2 years after the OKC pick is conveyed we owe the Nets but if it's not conveyed by 26 it converts to 2nds???
76ciology wrote:https://www.espn.ph/nba/story/_/id/44888875/nba-draft-2025-projecting-30-best-prospects
Pelton got Kon and VJ over Dylan Harper in his latest projections.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the Spurs take VJ over Harper. VJ has a more promising shooting profile, with a better off the dribble jumper #s from both midrange and 3 compared to Harper. While he struggled early in the season, he turned it around during conference play, posting a 58% TS after the first two months.
Teams reportedly high on VJ
- Sixers
- Hornets
- Wizards
- Pelicans?
I think Jazz would like to join but they know VJ wont be available at their spot.
Knueppel posted a .642 true shooting percentage on 35% usage in 2023, giving him the strongest projection based solely on EYBL play of any draft prospect who competed in either 2022 or 2023.
Arsenal wrote:youngcrev wrote:Why would we take Thabo Sefolosha at #8 in prospects = their NBA comp world?
One of the dumbest comparisons I've seen.![]()
You must be really desperate to defend your boy VJ Melton.
Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.
Looking at season splits one thing to note:
Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks
VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks
SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.
Foshan wrote:really not sure i'm comfortable moving back to 8 at this point. Maybe if something crazy happens and Tre slips... but i don't see it. I feel like a lot of the stuff that is getting posted now is just click bait stuff. 3-6 i can talk myself into the value we got taking 'our star' at 3, or trading down for extra value... but after 6 i'd really have a tough time.
Arsenal wrote:OleSchool wrote:Covi_Marsh wrote:
I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.
How does the pick we owe the Nets work? 2 years after the OKC pick is conveyed we owe the Nets but if it's not conveyed by 26 it converts to 2nds???
Yes it's now our 2028 1st to BKN since we're not conveying a 1st to OKC until 2026.
If our 28 1st is top 8 we keep it, otherwise it goes to BKN. Therefore it's not that valuable since we can just tank and keep it.
If that happens, we only owe BKN a 2nd instead.
NYSixersFan wrote:quite simply, If I were GM, We would have a good young playoff team right now; with cap flexibility going forward
NYSixersFan wrote:I'D BE more then happy to debate you or anyone else on specifics
NYSixersFan wrote:How can I give you specifics? I'm not talking to other GM's
eyeatoma wrote:FlyingArrow wrote:What is the case for VJ over Tre?
There isn't one, it's the case where athleticism, and defense make people wonder if he'll be a superstar, just because he got better on offense in the last 2 years.
Tre Johnson is a generational shooter which every team in the league would covet. You can find good defenders a dime a dozen. VJ is not someone you take with the #3 pick when your team is on the brink of losing it's franchise star to injuries. You swing for the fences, I said the same about Ace, but he's a jackoff, Tre is the next best option. At worst he's a great 3 point shooter which every team can use. At best, he's one of the top scorers in the league.
FlyingArrow wrote:eyeatoma wrote:FlyingArrow wrote:What is the case for VJ over Tre?
There isn't one, it's the case where athleticism, and defense make people wonder if he'll be a superstar, just because he got better on offense in the last 2 years.
Tre Johnson is a generational shooter which every team in the league would covet. You can find good defenders a dime a dozen. VJ is not someone you take with the #3 pick when your team is on the brink of losing it's franchise star to injuries. You swing for the fences, I said the same about Ace, but he's a jackoff, Tre is the next best option. At worst he's a great 3 point shooter which every team can use. At best, he's one of the top scorers in the league.
I haven't followed the prospects at all, but Tre's passing highlights were enough to convince me. Even assuming the rest of his game has no other standout abilities - just "average for a top 5 pick", I'd choose him above Ace or VJ. (Or Harper, tbh. A guard should be a shooter.) If Tre's scoring is even better than his passing, then why isn't he consensus #2? I almost hesitate to talk about it, because I don't want to see San Antonio get any ideas.
Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.
Looking at season splits one thing to note:
Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks
VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks
SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.
eyeatoma wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.
Looking at season splits one thing to note:
Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks
VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks
SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.
Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.
youngcrev wrote:Morey has been far less imaginative and experimental as a GM than I expected. In a grand sense, we've made major roster moves (Horford/Simmons/Harden/George), but it's also been pretty telegraphed.
So what's a chalk off-season look like right now? Because that's what feels like Morey at this point to me.
Something really basic like draft VJ at 3, dump Gordon and/or Drummond's salary at the cost of a 2nd or 2 to get some apron flexibility (or do some manipulative Morey stuff to get them to opt out with false promises), re-sign Grimes and Yabu, and then bring in some vet minimums.
G: Maxey, McCain, VJ, Grimes, Butler
F: Podcast, Yabu, Oubre, Edwards
C: Embiid, Bona, vet min guy
Pretty underwhelming. Gotta be more than that... Right?
Negrodamus wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.
Looking at season splits one thing to note:
Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks
VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks
SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.
Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.
VJ played against more top 50 defenses. For all the hype of the SEC (and I’m one of the fan boys), they were pretty bad defensively comparatively speaking.
eyeatoma wrote:Negrodamus wrote:eyeatoma wrote:
Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.
VJ played against more top 50 defenses. For all the hype of the SEC (and I’m one of the fan boys), they were pretty bad defensively comparatively speaking.
People can throw all the stats out there, but the chasm in shooting from Tre and VJ is like comparing Nikola Jokic to Kelly Olynk. Yeah they're both good passing big men, but there are levels here.
Tre is 1 of 1, and Vj, is a good set shooter. Even in the most optimistic timelines VJ will not be a pure shooter. The sky is the limit for Tre as far as offense goes.
Covi_Marsh wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.
Looking at season splits one thing to note:
Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks
VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks
SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.
Tre has a slow first step which can be helped with a pick and his shooting will force players to come over the screen and he has the playmaking to pass to the big if their big hedges. So I can see a fit but he has not shown anything outside of offense. I don’t even think Nurse cares about elite in ball defense. He wants disruption in passing lanes which Tre hasn’t even show a willingness to do. Doesn’t rebound a lick either. VJ is more of a Morey prospect just because of elite transition play which is high efficiency. He fits in Nurse disruptive defense. He’s athletic. And he does the non-box score elite plays.
Tre has slow lateral movement which is physical. He will always be food on defense. And the ppl that see upside in his defense or rim attacks but laugh at Ace who is faster and more agile then Tre is crazy.