ImageImageImage

2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

What should we do at #3?

Ace Bailey
18
21%
Tre Johnson
14
16%
V.J. Edgecombe
32
37%
Other
3
3%
Trade
20
23%
 
Total votes: 87

User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,737
And1: 26,777
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1181 » by 76ciology » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:13 pm

Stanford wrote:That's not a mock.


Projection. Yeah, my bad. Almost same description for me.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Covi_Marsh
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 394
Joined: Nov 20, 2018
       

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1182 » by Covi_Marsh » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:16 pm

phifans wrote:
youngcrev wrote:Ace and Cam Thomas ending up on the same team is gonna be hilarious. Sick tank potential. Especially with them being the big cap space team in a year with no free agents. They should collect assets as a trade facilitator taking on salary and tank hard.


If that's the case make sure we trade #3 for #8 and their own 26 first round pick. :lol:


I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.
OleSchool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,980
And1: 1,466
Joined: Nov 22, 2013
Location: Behind you, no seriously turn around
       

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1183 » by OleSchool » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:20 pm

Covi_Marsh wrote:
phifans wrote:
youngcrev wrote:Ace and Cam Thomas ending up on the same team is gonna be hilarious. Sick tank potential. Especially with them being the big cap space team in a year with no free agents. They should collect assets as a trade facilitator taking on salary and tank hard.


If that's the case make sure we trade #3 for #8 and their own 26 first round pick. :lol:


I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.


How does the pick we owe the Nets work? 2 years after the OKC pick is conveyed we owe the Nets but if it's not conveyed by 26 it converts to 2nds???
NYSixersFan wrote:quite simply, If I were GM, We would have a good young playoff team right now; with cap flexibility going forward


NYSixersFan wrote:I'D BE more then happy to debate you or anyone else on specifics


NYSixersFan wrote:How can I give you specifics? I'm not talking to other GM's
M2J
Analyst
Posts: 3,623
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 04, 2012

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1184 » by M2J » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:26 pm

https://www.youtube.com/live/iMEzpSo6UXQ


Bleacher report with Jake Fischer saying a bunch of Philly stuff

Says teams assume Philly takes VJ (good job Daryl). He thinks Yabu is gone due to Grimes costing more than they assumed when trading for him.... But that's speculation based on 2nd Apron talk. Plus a bunch of other speculation


I think it would be stupid for Daryl to let Yabu or Grimes go due to 2nd Apron. That only matters at the end of the season if you're over the apron. Therefore you can play it out and build their value by playing them and trade them or trade someone else with some seconds or something to get under the apron if you want by the deadline.... Primarily Gordon and Andre
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,054
And1: 11,958
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1185 » by Arsenal » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:27 pm

OleSchool wrote:
Covi_Marsh wrote:
phifans wrote:
If that's the case make sure we trade #3 for #8 and their own 26 first round pick. :lol:


I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.


How does the pick we owe the Nets work? 2 years after the OKC pick is conveyed we owe the Nets but if it's not conveyed by 26 it converts to 2nds???


Yes it's now our 2028 1st to BKN since we're not conveying a 1st to OKC until 2026.

If our 28 1st is top 8 we keep it, otherwise it goes to BKN. Therefore it's not that valuable since we can just tank and keep it.

If that happens, we only owe BKN a 2nd instead.
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,337
And1: 6,069
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1186 » by Jailblazers7 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:28 pm

I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.

Looking at season splits one thing to note:

Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks

VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks

SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,737
And1: 26,777
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1187 » by 76ciology » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:28 pm

76ciology wrote:https://www.espn.ph/nba/story/_/id/44888875/nba-draft-2025-projecting-30-best-prospects

Pelton got Kon and VJ over Dylan Harper in his latest projections.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Spurs take VJ over Harper. VJ has a more promising shooting profile, with a better off the dribble jumper #s from both midrange and 3 compared to Harper. While he struggled early in the season, he turned it around during conference play, posting a 58% TS after the first two months.

Teams reportedly high on VJ
- Sixers
- Hornets
- Wizards
- Pelicans?

I think Jazz would like to join but they know VJ wont be available at their spot.


Pelton on Kon

Knueppel posted a .642 true shooting percentage on 35% usage in 2023, giving him the strongest projection based solely on EYBL play of any draft prospect who competed in either 2022 or 2023.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,737
And1: 9,649
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1188 » by youngcrev » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:30 pm

Arsenal wrote:
youngcrev wrote:Why would we take Thabo Sefolosha at #8 in prospects = their NBA comp world?


One of the dumbest comparisons I've seen. :crazy:

You must be really desperate to defend your boy VJ Melton.


Long athletic French wings with zero offensive skill? Just not a believer in his YouTube. Ugly offensive game and I just don't think he's big enough to do the things he does over there. If he had freakish measurements I could be in, but he doesn't. Shooting numbers stink.

I'm kinda surprised you'd be in as much as you are on him and be anti-VJ. I think a high end outcome (defensive role playing starter) is a lower end outcome for VJ.

I've pretty consistently said I'd trade down since I don't see the value of taking any of these guys at #3 even though I like some of them. That includes VJ. I also think staying at 3 and taking VJ is the most likely outcome, so I'm preparing myself for it.
Covi_Marsh
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 394
Joined: Nov 20, 2018
       

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1189 » by Covi_Marsh » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:41 pm

Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.

Looking at season splits one thing to note:

Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks

VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks

SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.


Tre has a slow first step which can be helped with a pick and his shooting will force players to come over the screen and he has the playmaking to pass to the big if their big hedges. So I can see a fit but he has not shown anything outside of offense. I don’t even think Nurse cares about elite in ball defense. He wants disruption in passing lanes which Tre hasn’t even show a willingness to do. Doesn’t rebound a lick either. VJ is more of a Morey prospect just because of elite transition play which is high efficiency. He fits in Nurse disruptive defense. He’s athletic. And he does the non-box score elite plays.

Tre has slow lateral movement which is physical. He will always be food on defense. And the ppl that see upside in his defense or rim attacks but laugh at Ace who is faster and more agile then Tre is crazy.
User avatar
Foshan
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,523
And1: 2,094
Joined: Jan 10, 2009

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1190 » by Foshan » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:42 pm

really not sure i'm comfortable moving back to 8 at this point. Maybe if something crazy happens and Tre slips... but i don't see it. I feel like a lot of the stuff that is getting posted now is just click bait stuff. 3-6 i can talk myself into the value we got taking 'our star' at 3, or trading down for extra value... but after 6 i'd really have a tough time.
Covi_Marsh
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 394
Joined: Nov 20, 2018
       

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1191 » by Covi_Marsh » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:57 pm

Foshan wrote:really not sure i'm comfortable moving back to 8 at this point. Maybe if something crazy happens and Tre slips... but i don't see it. I feel like a lot of the stuff that is getting posted now is just click bait stuff. 3-6 i can talk myself into the value we got taking 'our star' at 3, or trading down for extra value... but after 6 i'd really have a tough time.


I feel like if we move back to 8 it would be
1 Cooper
2 Harper
3 Bailey
4 Edgecombe
5 Tre
6 Fears
7 Khaman Maluach
8 Kon
OleSchool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,980
And1: 1,466
Joined: Nov 22, 2013
Location: Behind you, no seriously turn around
       

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1192 » by OleSchool » Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:58 pm

Arsenal wrote:
OleSchool wrote:
Covi_Marsh wrote:
I’d definitely need a Brooklyn future pick to move back. That ‘28 pick we sent them is top 7 protected then turns to a 2nd. If embiid is washed we can run this season give our pick to Thunder then have all our picks for the future in a rebuild effort.


How does the pick we owe the Nets work? 2 years after the OKC pick is conveyed we owe the Nets but if it's not conveyed by 26 it converts to 2nds???



Yes it's now our 2028 1st to BKN since we're not conveying a 1st to OKC until 2026.

If our 28 1st is top 8 we keep it, otherwise it goes to BKN. Therefore it's not that valuable since we can just tank and keep it.

If that happens, we only owe BKN a 2nd instead.


Ok I thought there was some weird protection where if it doesn't convey by 26 it turns to seconds.

Thanks for the clarification!

*edit*

Should've stopped be so damn lazy and googled it. According to ESPN

Brooklyn will receive Philadelphia's unprotected 2022 first-round pick, with the right to defer it to 2023, as well as a top-8-protected 2027 first-round pick, sources told ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski. That pick would remain top-8 protected in 2028, and will turn into two second-round picks -- and $2 million in cash -- if it doesn't convey in either season, sources said.
NYSixersFan wrote:quite simply, If I were GM, We would have a good young playoff team right now; with cap flexibility going forward


NYSixersFan wrote:I'D BE more then happy to debate you or anyone else on specifics


NYSixersFan wrote:How can I give you specifics? I'm not talking to other GM's
FlyingArrow
Veteran
Posts: 2,514
And1: 1,600
Joined: May 29, 2018
   

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1193 » by FlyingArrow » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:04 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
FlyingArrow wrote:What is the case for VJ over Tre?



There isn't one, it's the case where athleticism, and defense make people wonder if he'll be a superstar, just because he got better on offense in the last 2 years.

Tre Johnson is a generational shooter which every team in the league would covet. You can find good defenders a dime a dozen. VJ is not someone you take with the #3 pick when your team is on the brink of losing it's franchise star to injuries. You swing for the fences, I said the same about Ace, but he's a jackoff, Tre is the next best option. At worst he's a great 3 point shooter which every team can use. At best, he's one of the top scorers in the league.

I haven't followed the prospects at all, but Tre's passing highlights were enough to convince me. Even assuming the rest of his game has no other standout abilities - just "average for a top 5 pick", I'd choose him above Ace or VJ. (Or Harper, tbh. A guard should be a shooter.) If Tre's scoring is even better than his passing, then why isn't he consensus #2? I almost hesitate to talk about it, because I don't want to see San Antonio get any ideas.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,826
And1: 13,129
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1194 » by eyeatoma » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:34 pm

FlyingArrow wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
FlyingArrow wrote:What is the case for VJ over Tre?



There isn't one, it's the case where athleticism, and defense make people wonder if he'll be a superstar, just because he got better on offense in the last 2 years.

Tre Johnson is a generational shooter which every team in the league would covet. You can find good defenders a dime a dozen. VJ is not someone you take with the #3 pick when your team is on the brink of losing it's franchise star to injuries. You swing for the fences, I said the same about Ace, but he's a jackoff, Tre is the next best option. At worst he's a great 3 point shooter which every team can use. At best, he's one of the top scorers in the league.

I haven't followed the prospects at all, but Tre's passing highlights were enough to convince me. Even assuming the rest of his game has no other standout abilities - just "average for a top 5 pick", I'd choose him above Ace or VJ. (Or Harper, tbh. A guard should be a shooter.) If Tre's scoring is even better than his passing, then why isn't he consensus #2? I almost hesitate to talk about it, because I don't want to see San Antonio get any ideas.



Because he doesn't drive, and he doesn't play a lick of d.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,826
And1: 13,129
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1195 » by eyeatoma » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:36 pm

Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.

Looking at season splits one thing to note:

Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks

VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks

SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.



Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,450
And1: 16,988
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1196 » by Negrodamus » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:38 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.

Looking at season splits one thing to note:

Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks

VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks

SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.



Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.


VJ played against more top 50 defenses. For all the hype of the SEC (and I’m one of the fan boys), they were pretty bad defensively comparatively speaking.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,021
And1: 10,281
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1197 » by the_process » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:45 pm

youngcrev wrote:Morey has been far less imaginative and experimental as a GM than I expected. In a grand sense, we've made major roster moves (Horford/Simmons/Harden/George), but it's also been pretty telegraphed.

So what's a chalk off-season look like right now? Because that's what feels like Morey at this point to me.

Something really basic like draft VJ at 3, dump Gordon and/or Drummond's salary at the cost of a 2nd or 2 to get some apron flexibility (or do some manipulative Morey stuff to get them to opt out with false promises :o ), re-sign Grimes and Yabu, and then bring in some vet minimums.

G: Maxey, McCain, VJ, Grimes, Butler
F: Podcast, Yabu, Oubre, Edwards
C: Embiid, Bona, vet min guy

Pretty underwhelming. Gotta be more than that... Right?


All of Morey's big moves have been telegraphed a mile away, agreed.

I'd argue for this draft that means he's trading the pick. Most of the noise has been about being open for business.

Yabu can only be re-signed if he takes the TMLE. Otherwise, they can't hard cap themselves at the 1st apron with a lottery pick and Grimes to sign and then the potential for other trades. Because another telegraphed Morey move is chasing available stars. And there will be teams looking to move big money players.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,826
And1: 13,129
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1198 » by eyeatoma » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:47 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.

Looking at season splits one thing to note:

Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks

VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks

SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.



Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.


VJ played against more top 50 defenses. For all the hype of the SEC (and I’m one of the fan boys), they were pretty bad defensively comparatively speaking.


People can throw all the stats out there, but the chasm in shooting from Tre and VJ is like comparing Nikola Jokic to Kelly Olynk. Yeah they're both good passing big men, but there are levels here.

Tre is 1 of 1, and Vj, is a good set shooter. Even in the most optimistic timelines VJ will not be a pure shooter. The sky is the limit for Tre as far as offense goes.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,450
And1: 16,988
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1199 » by Negrodamus » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:51 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:

Tre also averaged 20 ppg in the hardest conference in the NCAA, and was not put in a good position on his team.


VJ played against more top 50 defenses. For all the hype of the SEC (and I’m one of the fan boys), they were pretty bad defensively comparatively speaking.


People can throw all the stats out there, but the chasm in shooting from Tre and VJ is like comparing Nikola Jokic to Kelly Olynk. Yeah they're both good passing big men, but there are levels here.

Tre is 1 of 1, and Vj, is a good set shooter. Even in the most optimistic timelines VJ will not be a pure shooter. The sky is the limit for Tre as far as offense goes.


Big chasm in shooting, and VJ does everything else better. The shooting chasm between Lillard and Jimmy Butler is huge… because they’re different players. It’s a confusing point to make because shooting isn’t the only aspect of the game.
Phillybul
Freshman
Posts: 73
And1: 67
Joined: Mar 08, 2025
     

Re: 2024-2025 College Basketball / NBA Draft - Volume III 

Post#1200 » by Phillybul » Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:01 pm

Covi_Marsh wrote:
Jailblazers7 wrote:I love how we’ve got people on here saying there is no case for VJ over Tre. Many professional talent evaluators (including Daryl Morey possibly) have VJ over Tre. I’m totally open to the case for Tre at this point - in fact I think you can make a decent case for 3-4 different players at our draft slot.

Looking at season splits one thing to note:

Tre Johnson in conference play:
40% FG, 36% 3pt, 90% FT 3 apg, 1.9 TOV, 1.3 stocks

VJ Edgecombe in conference play:
45% FG, 37% 3pt, 81% FT, 3.3 apt, 2 TOV, 2.3 stocks

SEC is obviously a better conference so you've gotta mentally account for that but VJ faired better in conference play when scouting & talent level gets better.


Tre has a slow first step which can be helped with a pick and his shooting will force players to come over the screen and he has the playmaking to pass to the big if their big hedges. So I can see a fit but he has not shown anything outside of offense. I don’t even think Nurse cares about elite in ball defense. He wants disruption in passing lanes which Tre hasn’t even show a willingness to do. Doesn’t rebound a lick either. VJ is more of a Morey prospect just because of elite transition play which is high efficiency. He fits in Nurse disruptive defense. He’s athletic. And he does the non-box score elite plays.

Tre has slow lateral movement which is physical. He will always be food on defense. And the ppl that see upside in his defense or rim attacks but laugh at Ace who is faster and more agile then Tre is crazy.



Tre first step is about as good as Devin Bookers and James Harden. If Tre can buy in on defense and show a willingness to play it? I think he will be alright. That’s all you need really is a willingness to play defense. Shai, Tatum, Haliburton did it. If Tre is the gym rat they say he is. I see the potential to not be a cone/liability. I’m onboard the Tre wagon over VJ. Whether Morey does that or not I have no clue lol Gonna have to accept whomever he decides.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers