Dylan Harper

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,037
And1: 3,829
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#141 » by vincecarter4pres » Tue Jun 17, 2025 11:46 am

The-Power wrote:First off, DLo was a great prospect. The fact that he never fully lived up to expectations in the NBA does not mean that a prospect comparable to DLo coming out of college isn't a great prospect.

Second, the comparison really does not make a ton of sense when it comes to athleticism. DLo was so highly sought after in large part because of his projected shooting ability (in addition to his creative playmaking). That's not what people expect from Harper.

The difference in terms of athleticism is easily illustrated by two simple metrics. First, Harper's FTr is 0.419 compared to DLo's 0.303. Second and most notably, Harper's 2P% is 57.4 compared to DLo's 47.9. That's almost 10 percentage points difference, and that's with DLo being the better midrange shooter. The difference stems from Harper getting to the rim a lot more often and converting a lot better when he's there, and that's a function of his athleticism (size, strength, burst).

So no, Harper is not comparable to DLo as an athlete. Does that make him a better prospect? That's debatable – but not because Harper isn't a great prospect but because DLo was a great prospect, too.

Said perfectly.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,789
And1: 2,151
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#142 » by Upperclass » Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:26 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:
tmorgan wrote:Harper is not a great athlete, but DLo? C’mon now. Everyone knew DLo was getting by with size and craftiness at OSU and was going to struggle getting into the paint in the pros. Harper is not going to have that problem. I think he’ll have some other issues, but that’s not one of them.

Would actually say Harper indeed is a great athlete. In the same sense Harden, young prime D Will, Fox, etc., were/are great athletes.

He just isn’t a jump out of the gym freak like Vince Carter or Giannis.

He’s not top of the league elite tier, but he’s gonna be way up there.

He’s beyond a Jamal Murray, who is an above average, but not standout athlete.


We'll see. Harper has nothing in common with those athletes other than 2 of the 3 also being left-handed. Seems like a guy whos best performances will be on low expectation teams.
ReggiesKnicks
Starter
Posts: 2,209
And1: 1,798
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#143 » by ReggiesKnicks » Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:43 pm

Dlo with a driven mindset and desire to get into the paint is an All-NBA player.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,037
And1: 3,829
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#144 » by vincecarter4pres » Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:03 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:Dlo with a driven mindset and desire to get into the paint is an All-NBA player.

Let alone DLo’s athleticism was always considered super suspect, especially for a lead guard.

He makes Andre Miller look like Baron Davis.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,037
And1: 3,829
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#145 » by vincecarter4pres » Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:04 pm

Upperclass wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
tmorgan wrote:Harper is not a great athlete, but DLo? C’mon now. Everyone knew DLo was getting by with size and craftiness at OSU and was going to struggle getting into the paint in the pros. Harper is not going to have that problem. I think he’ll have some other issues, but that’s not one of them.

Would actually say Harper indeed is a great athlete. In the same sense Harden, young prime D Will, Fox, etc., were/are great athletes.

He just isn’t a jump out of the gym freak like Vince Carter or Giannis.

He’s not top of the league elite tier, but he’s gonna be way up there.

He’s beyond a Jamal Murray, who is an above average, but not standout athlete.


We'll see. Harper has nothing in common with those athletes other than 2 of the 3 also being left-handed. Seems like a guy whos best performances will be on low expectation teams.

He actually has a lot in common with them.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 19,953
And1: 4,816
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#146 » by tontoz » Sat Jun 21, 2025 7:55 pm

Upperclass wrote:Harper is who everyone thinks Kon is. Slow, cant turn the corner, overrated shooter, mediocre, unwilling passer. Just a dude whos game looks close enough to Hardens to go top 5.


3/4 court sprint

Harper 3.16
Kon 3.35

Lane agility time

Harper 11.07
Kon 11.92 (yikes)

Harper routinely beat the best defenders off the dribble. He absolutely shredded Alabama when they tried to single cover him. After that he got doubled a lot but frequently still got past them.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 19,953
And1: 4,816
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#147 » by tontoz » Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:00 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=01oml4XRMfVYNUA2QQVSQQ&s=19
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,652
And1: 4,676
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#148 » by CptCrunch » Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:32 pm

Harper is the best finisher since Uncle Drew. Irving had a lot more juice but is quite a bit smaller.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 13,972
And1: 9,431
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#149 » by tmorgan » Sat Jun 21, 2025 10:14 pm

He’s def gonna get to the rim and is thus a nice fit with Wemby. Not so great with the rest of the Spurs roster, tho, particularly whatever guard he’s playing with (Fox or Castle) and Sochan. Spurs really need to make some moves and get some snipers.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 33,764
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#150 » by azcatz11 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:09 pm

tmorgan wrote:He’s def gonna get to the rim and is thus a nice fit with Wemby. Not so great with the rest of the Spurs roster, tho, particularly whatever guard he’s playing with (Fox or Castle) and Sochan. Spurs really need to make some moves and get some snipers.


They should trade Fox. He doesn’t align with the timeline and he makes a lot anyways. Who can they get for Fox? Tyler Herro?
User avatar
Bloodbather
Pro Prospect
Posts: 781
And1: 1,515
Joined: Dec 23, 2023
 

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#151 » by Bloodbather » Yesterday 1:12 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
tmorgan wrote:He’s def gonna get to the rim and is thus a nice fit with Wemby. Not so great with the rest of the Spurs roster, tho, particularly whatever guard he’s playing with (Fox or Castle) and Sochan. Spurs really need to make some moves and get some snipers.


They should trade Fox. He doesn’t align with the timeline and he makes a lot anyways. Who can they get for Fox? Tyler Herro?


They should go for the two timelines approach, imo. Wemby is already good enough to compete. If they can get KD without giving up Harper and Castle, for #14 and Vassell for example, they'll be in great shape.
Bucks4005
Sophomore
Posts: 149
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 16, 2019
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#152 » by Bucks4005 » Yesterday 1:21 pm

Does anyone thing a castle could play heavy minutes at SF. I mean, he’s got decent bulk, could just commit to the full on OG lineup like OKC with say a Fox-Harper-Castle lineup. I mean, part of why it works for OKC is Williams is able to play PF, SF, etc. despite being SG sized which allows them to do that, but wanted to hear thoughts on how people think am3 G starting lineup would work? Maybe you get a veteran like Lopez for spacing and bulk to bang down low to allow Wemby to play more PF at times like Holmgren, etc

Or do people think it’d just end up more as Harper or Castle as the 6th man as the primary backup guard, stay bigger with a consistent SF/PF?
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,058
And1: 7,787
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#153 » by Dat2U » Yesterday 1:56 pm

Bucks4005 wrote:Does anyone thing a castle could play heavy minutes at SF. I mean, he’s got decent bulk, could just commit to the full on OG lineup like OKC with say a Fox-Harper-Castle lineup. I mean, part of why it works for OKC is Williams is able to play PF, SF, etc. despite being SG sized which allows them to do that, but wanted to hear thoughts on how people think am3 G starting lineup would work? Maybe you get a veteran like Lopez for spacing and bulk to bang down low to allow Wemby to play more PF at times like Holmgren, etc

Or do people think it’d just end up more as Harper or Castle as the 6th man as the primary backup guard, stay bigger with a consistent SF/PF?


Harper is clearly the 2nd best player in the draft but the fit with Fox, Castle & Sochan feels clunky at best and potentially development stunting at worst. Castle, Fox, Sochan & Vasell were already an awkward fit due to spacing & guys needing the ball. That only gets tougher when you add yet another elite on-the-ball slashing threat.

If the Spurs LOVE Harper, they'll need to retool the roster around him & Wemby and move off at least 2 of the 3 (Fox, Sochan & Castle) to add off the ball spacing instead.

Castle is my biggest concern because he needs to ball in his hands and his value and usefulness is significantly muted off the ball. He's not a stand in the corner guy at all, which what he becomes in a lineup with Harper & Fox.

Return to NBA Draft