ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,933
And1: 1,147
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#721 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Tue Jun 24, 2025 12:45 am

I think 25 others NBA team would to have a poorly constructed team as his Minny :). I know off season is the season of speculation but if we are realistic, it's not easy to make big moves right now considering our financial situation.

On my opinion we have 2 options only :
A/
- Getting a starter PG if we can even it's very unlikely we can build a trade who won't cost us big.
- Getting a back up big
- Keep Naz and Randle.

B/ We consider that this group can't win and in this case , trade Rudy, Randle for something bigger. More easy to speak than make it done.

If i was the GM, after 2 WCF finals, i do think we are not far to make the next step so i would probably go for option A.

ANT, Jaden, NAZ, TSJ, Clark, Rob will keep improving. Randle and Rudy are solid players, DDV is a great shooter, Mike is the captain. We are good. This only move i would make is trading NAW. IT will allow more mins for the others young's. I love NAW but he is not essential.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#722 » by Nick K » Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:20 am

minimus wrote:BRO OUT: Cameron Johnson, Whitehead, Lewis, 26th pick
BRO IN: Vucevic, DDV,

Why for BRO: get a tradeable assets

CHI OUT: Vucevic, Ball, Smith
CHI IN: Gobert, Whitehead, Lewis

Why for CHI: continues rebuild, maybe Giddey can run pick-n-rolls with Gobert like prime Ingles did

MIN OUT: Gobert, DDV
MIN IN: Johnson, Ball, Smith, 26th pick

Why for MIN: replace DDV with comparable shooter, but at SF/PF position, create room and roles for Dillingham, Clark, add backup/temporary solution at PG in Ball and Smith, get additional pick.

Re-sign both Reid and Randle, NAW. Draft Sorber, and Thiero at 26 and 31.

Smith/Reid/Sorber
Randle/Johnson/Thiero
McDaniels/TJ/Minott
Edwards/Clark/???
Ball/Dilllngham/Conley


These things never work out but I'd do this in a heartbeat. I'm all for taking a chance on Ball and I like Smith too. Nice idea.

NAW won't be back. Just sayin. I love Sorber but he's rising and probably won't fall to us. He'd be our center of the future. Plus, I can't wait to move Rudy.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,299
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#723 » by thinktank » Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:29 am

Sorber’s hands are smaller than some of the guards in the draft. He looks clunky. I just don’t see it.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#724 » by karch34 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:58 am

Norseman79 wrote:Alright, let's see how much hate I get...

Por out: Simons
In: Randle, Miller

MN in: Simons
Out: Randle, Miller

Why? MN gets a dynamic combo guard with one year remaining on contract to pair with Edwards. Simons playing situation has limited his ability, next to Ant he could thrive. If it doesn't work, he expires. Also clears space for Naz at the 4.

PG - Simons, Conley, Dilly
SG - Ant, DD, Clark
SF - McDaniels, TSJ
PF - Naz, 17/31 (Sorber/Newell, Wolf) vet fa
C. - Gobert, 17/31(Beringer, Kalkbrenner), Garza

Why Portland? They move Simons, who has given them a dilemma in the backcourt. Also, they get Randle to give them a PF, again an expiring that will come off the cap. And Miller as a prospect. Randle and Ayton could actually be enough to get them to the play in, or get them a nice trade return down the road.

PG - Henderson, Banton
SG - Sharpe, Thybule/Rupert
SF - Avdija, Murray/Camara
PF - Randle, Camara/Miller
C. - Ayton, Clingan, Reath


I like it but your forgetting Jeremi Grant is still there.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#725 » by Nick K » Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:04 am

FrenchMinnyFan wrote:I think 25 others NBA team would to have a poorly constructed team as his Minny :). I know off season is the season of speculation but if we are realistic, it's not easy to make big moves right now considering our financial situation.

On my opinion we have 2 options only :
A/
- Getting a starter PG if we can even it's very unlikely we can build a trade who won't cost us big.
- Getting a back up big
- Keep Naz and Randle.

B/ We consider that this group can't win and in this case , trade Rudy, Randle for something bigger. More easy to speak than make it done.

If i was the GM, after 2 WCF finals, i do think we are not far to make the next step so i would probably go for option A.

ANT, Jaden, NAZ, TSJ, Clark, Rob will keep improving. Randle and Rudy are solid players, DDV is a great shooter, Mike is the captain. We are good. This only move i would make is trading NAW. IT will allow more mins for the others young's. I love NAW but he is not essential.


I can't wait to move both Gobert and Randle. Both should be valued. I'd love to get Giannis.
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 328
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#726 » by cmoss84 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:13 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:I'd be all for extracting value out of Rudy, before he slowly declines.. but we need him unless we get another c back.

Maybe lively? 17 enough? Probably not.

How do we get value out of Julius? He is not a guy we want on the team long-term.

Our team is currently constructed poorly, and there isn't a simple 1 for 1 trade benefiting both sides to fix it.

I wouldn't mind connelly taking a risk, but at the same time.. it's a difficult decision. Don't want to run it back, but not convinced there may be any other option..

Love the idea of going after Lively. How many big men can they have, and Gafford just extended.
Maybe something around DDV. Or #17/#31.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 328
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#727 » by cmoss84 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:47 am

Actually Rob for Lively is pretty damn close. I'm sure they'd want a pick as well. I'd be thrilled with that.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,363
And1: 642
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#728 » by Loaf_of_bread » Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:55 am

If we are serious about a run next year, we need a guy like lively. I'm ok with ddv plus 31 if that is his value. No clue what it would take to get him though..
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,363
And1: 642
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#729 » by Loaf_of_bread » Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:13 am

cmoss84 wrote:Actually Rob for Lively is pretty damn close. I'm sure they'd want a pick as well. I'd be thrilled with that.


Rob is currently untouchable, even though he may not turn into much.. would prefer to risk he plays well next year
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#730 » by Nick K » Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:14 am

jpatrick wrote:[x]
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=XQD5PNDwat0WI1cFRdOyRQ[/x]

If this is what really was offered and turned down, Mr. white not coming to Minnesota.


I don't believe any of that. Can't be true.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#731 » by Nick K » Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:27 am

cmoss84 wrote:Alright hear me out. It's summer school and the boredom is fierce. Milwaukee uses this year as a bridge year to contend AND rebuild. Get a haul for Giannis. Nets have a ton of picks, and decide to move a couple of them to sign Randle (they pick Julius over Beal). We give up everything we can to build around Ant/Jaden/Giannis, then monopolize free agency with a lot of freed up money and ring chasers (PG/PF/C).

Mil IN: Rudy, Naz (extend), DDV, RD, #17, #26, #27, #31, 2030 FRP (SAS)
Mil OUT: Giannis
RD (Lillard in '26)/DDV/Kuzma/Naz/Rudy
*Under 1st apron*

Nets IN: Randle and Minott
Nets OUT: #26 and #27
#8/#19/Cam Johnson/Randle/Claxton
*Under 1st apron*

MN IN: Giannis
MN OUT: Rudy, Randle, Naz, RD, DDV, Minott, #17, #31, 2030 FRP (SAS)
VET PG/Ant/Jaden/Giannis/Vet C
Mike/Clark/TSJ/FA/FA
Miller/Garza/FA/FA
*Under 1st apron*
($73m for 6 FA)


I love Giannis but giving up Gobert, Randle, DDV, Naz, Minott, Dilly and all those picks for Giannis???? Come on! We're sending out 120 million. Ridiculous.

How about Gobert and Randle plus a pick. That's all I'd give up. OK you could throw in Minott too. How is Minott for a sweetner?
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#732 » by Nick K » Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:30 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:I'd be all for extracting value out of Rudy, before he slowly declines.. but we need him unless we get another c back.

Maybe lively? 17 enough? Probably not.

How do we get value out of Julius? He is not a guy we want on the team long-term.

Our team is currently constructed poorly, and there isn't a simple 1 for 1 trade benefiting both sides to fix it.

I wouldn't mind connelly taking a risk, but at the same time.. it's a difficult decision. Don't want to run it back, but not convinced there may be any other option..


I love this post. The time to move Gobert and Randle is right now while their value is the highest. I'd love Giannis. Then i'd draft Sorber, Even Kalkbrenner.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#733 » by Nick K » Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:33 am

karch34 wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:Alright, let's see how much hate I get...

Por out: Simons
In: Randle, Miller

MN in: Simons
Out: Randle, Miller

Why? MN gets a dynamic combo guard with one year remaining on contract to pair with Edwards. Simons playing situation has limited his ability, next to Ant he could thrive. If it doesn't work, he expires. Also clears space for Naz at the 4.

PG - Simons, Conley, Dilly
SG - Ant, DD, Clark
SF - McDaniels, TSJ
PF - Naz, 17/31 (Sorber/Newell, Wolf) vet fa
C. - Gobert, 17/31(Beringer, Kalkbrenner), Garza

Why Portland? They move Simons, who has given them a dilemma in the backcourt. Also, they get Randle to give them a PF, again an expiring that will come off the cap. And Miller as a prospect. Randle and Ayton could actually be enough to get them to the play in, or get them a nice trade return down the road.

PG - Henderson, Banton
SG - Sharpe, Thybule/Rupert
SF - Avdija, Murray/Camara
PF - Randle, Camara/Miller
C. - Ayton, Clingan, Reath


I like it but your forgetting Jeremi Grant is still there.


Jeremi Grant is pure fools gold. No thanks.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#734 » by karch34 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:30 am

Nick K wrote:
karch34 wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:Alright, let's see how much hate I get...

Por out: Simons
In: Randle, Miller

MN in: Simons
Out: Randle, Miller

Why? MN gets a dynamic combo guard with one year remaining on contract to pair with Edwards. Simons playing situation has limited his ability, next to Ant he could thrive. If it doesn't work, he expires. Also clears space for Naz at the 4.

PG - Simons, Conley, Dilly
SG - Ant, DD, Clark
SF - McDaniels, TSJ
PF - Naz, 17/31 (Sorber/Newell, Wolf) vet fa
C. - Gobert, 17/31(Beringer, Kalkbrenner), Garza

Why Portland? They move Simons, who has given them a dilemma in the backcourt. Also, they get Randle to give them a PF, again an expiring that will come off the cap. And Miller as a prospect. Randle and Ayton could actually be enough to get them to the play in, or get them a nice trade return down the road.

PG - Henderson, Banton
SG - Sharpe, Thybule/Rupert
SF - Avdija, Murray/Camara
PF - Randle, Camara/Miller
C. - Ayton, Clingan, Reath


I like it but your forgetting Jeremi Grant is still there.


Jeremi Grant is pure fools gold. No thanks.


Wasn’t saying he comes back to us only that he is still a heavily paid PF not accounted for on their books. Moot with Holliday trade anyway.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,593
And1: 5,098
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#735 » by minimus » Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:19 am

It looks like in current NBA reality even washed up veterans like KD and Jrue worth more than young and talented garbage scorers like Simons and Green.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,433
And1: 2,853
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#736 » by Neeva » Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:55 am

Inefficient chuckers with no D are out, thank god.
KD isn’t as washed(yet) as Jrue though
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,593
And1: 5,098
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#737 » by minimus » Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:52 am

Lakers Are Favorites To Land Bam Adebayo In Potential Trade Deal With Heat


If MIA make Bam available I hope TC gets him.

BRO IN: Gobert, DDV, Robinson
BRO OUT: Cameron Johnson, Claxton, Whitehead, Lewis, 26th, 27th picks

Why for BRO: get a tradeable assets

MIA IN: Dillingham, Reid (sign-and-trade), Claxton, 17th, 27th picks, Whitehead, Lewis
MIA OUT: Bam, Robinson

Why for MIA: rebuild, trade Bam his extension

MIN IN: Bam, Johnson, 26th pick
MIN OUT: Gobert, DDV, Reid, Dillingham, 17th pick

Why for MIN: get long-term solution at C, replace DDV with comparable shooter, but at SF/PF position, get additional pick. Stay in win-now mode

Re-sign both Randle, NAW. Draft Walter Clayton Jr., and Kalkbrenner at 26 and 31.

Bam/Kalkbrenner/Miller
Randle/Johnson/McDaniels
McDaniels/TJ/Minott
Edwards/Clark/NAW
NAW/WCJ/Conley
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,355
And1: 854
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#738 » by Norseman79 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:18 am

Prediction - Simons makes all-star team/wins MIP award.
User avatar
ILC
Veteran
Posts: 2,665
And1: 2,240
Joined: Apr 15, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#739 » by ILC » Tue Jun 24, 2025 12:04 pm

Image

Too little for Zion? No need for DET at all? Would NOP just take Randle and Rob for themselves?

This for me would address A LOT of the biggest needs the Wolves have. Both Lonzo and Zion love to push the pace, love to put pressure on the rim, both are great passers and Rudy would finally have someone to throw him lobs.

Then if Fears is really falling that hard at #17 that'd be a homerun IMO.
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Redemption. Water into wine....rondo is Jesus
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,757
And1: 848
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#740 » by Guest84 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 12:42 pm

ILC wrote:Image

Too little for Zion? No need for DET at all? Would NOP just take Randle and Rob for themselves?

This for me would address A LOT of the biggest needs the Wolves have. Both Lonzo and Zion love to push the pace, love to put pressure on the rim, both are great passers and Rudy would finally have someone to throw him lobs.

Then if Fears is really falling that hard at #17 that'd be a homerun IMO.


Wolves would be taking on a TON of risk in that deal.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves