jfs1000d wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:It’s like we were playing without Porzi anyway, we were winning without him every single time.
Depends on what Simons can bring, we’re currently only down Jrue (the idea of him from the cup run).
Al and Korny will be known later, so can’t really say.
We really aren’t much different than last season before injury. Yes, we’re down Tatum, this same team was good without him (won without Jrue too IIRC). Just stay good until he comes back a month or so before the playoffs.
I never said we’ll win or get to the chip, I’m just not counting us out and thinking will be trash. We haven’t done much of anything that tells me we are much worse. Much worse than the chip team? ABSOLUTELY, but that was what we were last season anyway.
I know what some of you are saying, I heard you, I’m just not listening right now.
I really want to know what has changed from last season, so far? What have we lost?
I would rather us be trash than roll around with this mid as **** roster for years to come.
Who gives a **** about winning games next year
So you want to trade brown? Like, with Tatum here, you better have a player that is as good as Brown here. You can’t sacrifice Tatum’s career by not having a good enough no. 2. You need players that are as good as Brown or project to be better in 2026-27 when Tatum returns full strength.
Not opposed. But I don’t want to bring in Amen Thompson only to have to pay him more than Brown is being paid when his contract is up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was anti it prior to the Porzingis trade. But honestly now I am seriously thinking we should consider it.
I just don’t see us miraculously pulling similar players out of our ass.
I expected us to get some sort of asset for Porzingis.
We ended up with Porzingis and Holiday because of the assets we had in Rob, Marcus, Brogdon etc.
We don’t miraculously find assets like that now to obtain more talent on the roster.
I think we may well be in for a **** show of a time now.