BobbieL wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Sunsdeuce wrote:Probably regurgitating what you all already know
https://www.blazersedge.com/2025/6/24/24455217/nba-draft-oklahoma-city-thunder-portland-trail-blazers-jonathan-givony-rumors-trades
“The logical solution is to combine those picks into a single premium pick. According to ESPN’s Jonathan Givony, that appears to be exactly what the Thunder are working on. Givony said the following on ESPN’s SportCenter:
“I keep hearing rumblings that the Thunder are trying to move up. They have 15, 24, 44. They could package all three of those picks, look to move up four or five slots, maybe six to Toronto. It’s not clear on their roster that they have any real needs right now so they can afford to take a swing on a high-upside prospect who fits that defensive DNA that won them a championship.”
If this were the NFL draft, I’d be all for trading down. But in the NBA, the higher the pick the better chances of getting a quality player that makes an instant impact. Not a fan of trading down in the NBA.
Suns desperately need instant impact players, not projects. And projects are usually after the top 10 (with some exceptions obviously).
We're ironically in a similar situation with #10, #29, #52, #59. I don't expect we take 4 guys in this draft. Certainly not trading down for an additional 5th pick either.
The Suns should be looking for more future draft capital. Trade back this year from 10 to 15/24.. Take one of those picks for future years
I think they need more picks as they need more darts at the dart board. I don't need to see the Bol Bols or Damion Lees at the end of the bench
Given how short we are of FRP over the next few years, I'd much rather spread out our shots rather than concentrate it on this good but not great draft. As I mentioned to GOK, we only have so much bandwidth for rookie/youth development and drafting 3-4 prospects is going to absolutely stretch that