TorontoBarneys wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:
Rating the Ingram move before the guy has played even 1 game and is a known injury-prone player is ridiculous. Man you fell off as a poster.
Getting a guy who has a legit chance at being an all star for the equivalent of a mid 20s pick (NOP got 23 for it) this year is a great trade even if it doesn’t work out.
The risk is worth it - you can always evaluate by outcomes and results. Sometimes great processes end poorly, and bad process somehow works out great.
That’s why you lol at en entire body of work. Masais is near the top in the league. Maybe in league history.
My god... I can only stare in sheer awe at the top tier fanboyism of this post. This could be framed. How do you even start having a basketball conversation with someone like this? "Even if the trade turns out to be a mistake it was good in theory so that means it was a good trade." Just in sheer awe of you. Genuinely impressive.
That’s what you took from the post?
It’s more so I have an understanding that no one bats 100%, and that some moves are risky.
Two different franchises can operate on the exact same principles of drafting, signing, trades, etc. and you could end up with one contender and one bottom feeder because no moves are guaranteed. There’s no route you can take that is guaranteed to end with a contender at the end of the road.
It’s why OKC has a ring and PHI hasn’t made the ECF despite both doing the process. And that’s even with PHI getting an MVP player out of it to.
It’s no fanboy-ism. It’s just a stronger understanding of every move has some level or risk and different levels of reward.