3ammy3uck3ts wrote:

Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:Daffy wrote:SoFlaKingReal wrote:Shams is pushing this Kuminga stuff non-stop…
I'm expecting it to happen at this point.
Same unfortunately, which someone correct me if I’m wrong but that basically ends the Luka to Miami stuff or just being players in 2026 free agency for a max guy period. Unless we sign and trade for them but then things start getting tricky
SoFlaKingReal wrote:oreon wrote:fincane30 wrote:If going after Kuminga is real and if this does indicate a change in philosophy I welcome it. Basing entire offseasons on the chance that stars shake loose is bad process. This is star or nothing stuff is way past the expiration date. We currently sit at 7 guys who are 25 years of age an under. Make Kuminga the 8th. Throw in a in his prime Bam and let the youth and young vets go out there and play. Perhaps going in this direction leads to development of young players that makes them appealing assets for the ever elusive star trade.
Young players are only assets when they are not paid or when they overperform their contract.
If you sign Kuminga for 30 mil and he's an okay productive player, Heat will be stuck with that contract
This is just dumb and stupid cuz they too proud to see they need to rebuild.
Why commit more money to the Bam, Herro and a Kuminga core. The ceiling for those 3 is 1st round exits. Why would anyone want to watch for the next couple seasons.
I'd rather be awful and get high draft picks
We did the pay the role players and turn them into assets with Whiteside, JJ, Duncan, TJ, Dion and they were opposite of assets. We had to pay teams to take their contracts. Now Kuminga is younger, but same applies. Too much risk we get stuck with another unwanted contract on a mediocre team
I disagree that the team would have a first round ceiling. The current team we have now has a first round ceiling. Adding Kuminga and some other competent pieces elevates to a second round ceiling lol
Vertical Limit wrote:Kuminga at 4 years 80 which is comparable to Malik Monk, that contract is fine.
Once youre talking 100 million youre flirting with danger.. 120-130 million is absolute lunacy.
If it means that we are changing our offense, like i have been begging for us to do, and start attacking the paint more rather than allow roleplayers to shoot a million contested 3s/fadeaway 3s and restrict roleplayers from trying to create their own shot, im okay with it
Kuminga’s game is similar to Josh Smith… dont expect much from his jump shots.. sometimes he catches fire.. but he can attack the paint with the best of them.
oreon wrote:fincane30 wrote:If going after Kuminga is real and if this does indicate a change in philosophy I welcome it. Basing entire offseasons on the chance that stars shake loose is bad process. This is star or nothing stuff is way past the expiration date. We currently sit at 7 guys who are 25 years of age an under. Make Kuminga the 8th. Throw in a in his prime Bam and let the youth and young vets go out there and play. Perhaps going in this direction leads to development of young players that makes them appealing assets for the ever elusive star trade.
Young players are only assets when they are not paid or when they overperform their contract.
If you sign Kuminga for 30 mil and he's an okay productive player, Heat will be stuck with that contract
This is just dumb and stupid cuz they too proud to see they need to rebuild.
Why commit more money to the Bam, Herro and a Kuminga core. The ceiling for those 3 is 1st round exits. Why would anyone want to watch for the next couple seasons.
I'd rather be awful and get high draft picks
We did the pay the role players and turn them into assets with Whiteside, JJ, Duncan, TJ, Dion and they were opposite of assets. We had to pay teams to take their contracts. Now Kuminga is younger, but same applies. Too much risk we get stuck with another unwanted contract on a mediocre team
Vertical Limit wrote:SoFlaKingReal wrote:Vertical Limit wrote:Kuminga at 4 years 80 which is comparable to Malik Monk, that contract is fine.
Once youre talking 100 million youre flirting with danger.. 120-130 million is absolute lunacy.
If it means that we are changing our offense, like i have been begging for us to do, and start attacking the paint more rather than allow roleplayers to shoot a million contested 3s/fadeaway 3s and restrict roleplayers from trying to create their own shot, im okay with it
Kuminga’s game is similar to Josh Smith… dont expect much from his jump shots.. sometimes he catches fire.. but he can attack the paint with the best of them.
The problem is that style is a clunky fit with Bam.
I think it can open things up for bam.. Bam was getting absolutely swarmed by Allen and Mobley.. he needed someone on the team to take the pressure away..
Ty Jerome’s scrub ass had clamps on Herro, Garland kept telling us Herro is not a threat, and he was proven right.
no one else on the team was a threat they just focused on sending multiple bodies sometimes two bodies to Bam. And they knew the rest of the team isnt capable of doing **** on their own.
Kuminga’s rim pressure can only be a benefit.
I kept calling during the game on this board in the around the nba thread for Kuminga to play more minutes in the Rockets series.. i was like Moody has been absolutely useless.. podz isnt doing ****.. warriors up 3-1 and they coasted 2 games and pulled away in game 7.
Once curry got injured, wolves focused on butler, they didnt have a single player that can attack the basket, take the pressure away from butler.. just kept chucking 3s hoping to get lucky to a victory..
These are kumingas splits from game 2 - 5 after kerr came to his senses that Moody is useless and Kuminga needs to play:
Game 2: 18 points 5 rebounds 72% fg
Game 3: 30 points, 6 rebounds 3 assists 2 blocks 61% fg
Game 4: 23 points on 46% shooting
Game 5: 26 points on 48% shooting
oreon wrote:Vertical Limit wrote:Kuminga at 4 years 80 which is comparable to Malik Monk, that contract is fine.
Once youre talking 100 million youre flirting with danger.. 120-130 million is absolute lunacy.
If it means that we are changing our offense, like i have been begging for us to do, and start attacking the paint more rather than allow roleplayers to shoot a million contested 3s/fadeaway 3s and restrict roleplayers from trying to create their own shot, im okay with it
Kuminga’s game is similar to Josh Smith… dont expect much from his jump shots.. sometimes he catches fire.. but he can attack the paint with the best of them.
He doesn't make sense even at 20 mil a year for Miami. Kuminga would be suited for eams like Detroit that are young, already have a number 1 and need someone else to be 2nd or 3rd scorer. Kinda like what Randle was for Ant.
For Miami who has two 3rd options, adding another player who is suited to be 3rd option or less is pointless. We are just tying up our and flexibility on a direction to nowhere

3ammy3uck3ts wrote:In the Giannis talks the only untouchables are KJ, Ware, Jovic, Jaime, Highsmith, Kuminga, any of our picks, and settles
carnageta wrote:Tyler Herro
Kel'el Ware
Nikola Jovic
Andrew Wiggins
3 FRPs
For Giannis and change?
I can imagine this being like the 04' situation where we traded all of the kids (expect for Wade) for Shaq. Bam is clearly our 'Wade'.
MartyCONLONNN wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:In the Giannis talks the only untouchables are KJ, Ware, Jovic, Jaime, Highsmith, Kuminga, any of our picks, and settles
The report is so stupid. He hasn't even asked out and it's common knowledge that big market teams would like to acquire a top 3 player in their prime ... also every other team would be interested, not just those 3 lol
carnageta wrote:Tyler Herro
Kel'el Ware
Nikola Jovic
Andrew Wiggins
3 FRPs
For Giannis and change?
I can imagine this being like the 04' situation where we traded all of the kids (expect for Wade) for Shaq. Bam is clearly our 'Wade'.
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:carnageta wrote:Tyler Herro
Kel'el Ware
Nikola Jovic
Andrew Wiggins
3 FRPs
For Giannis and change?
I can imagine this being like the 04' situation where we traded all of the kids (expect for Wade) for Shaq. Bam is clearly our 'Wade'.
No to Wiggins, we need him for our Gabe Vincent pursuit
MartyCONLONNN wrote:carnageta wrote:Tyler Herro
Kel'el Ware
Nikola Jovic
Andrew Wiggins
3 FRPs
For Giannis and change?
I can imagine this being like the 04' situation where we traded all of the kids (expect for Wade) for Shaq. Bam is clearly our 'Wade'.
27 YO Bam with an overlapping skillset as Giannis except worse than Giannis at everything except being a more versatile defender...
yeah that is not the same complimentary pairing as an unstoppable two way scoring guard complimented by a dominant paint force in Shaq. Sadly the better option would be replacing Bam with Giannis and keeping the spacing.
MartyCONLONNN wrote:carnageta wrote:Tyler Herro
Kel'el Ware
Nikola Jovic
Andrew Wiggins
3 FRPs
For Giannis and change?
I can imagine this being like the 04' situation where we traded all of the kids (expect for Wade) for Shaq. Bam is clearly our 'Wade'.
27 YO Bam with an overlapping skillset as Giannis except worse than Giannis at everything except being a more versatile defender...
yeah that is not the same complimentary pairing as an unstoppable two way scoring guard complimented by a dominant paint force in Shaq. Sadly the better option would be replacing Bam with Giannis and keeping the spacing.
MartyCONLONNN wrote:carnageta wrote:Tyler Herro
Kel'el Ware
Nikola Jovic
Andrew Wiggins
3 FRPs
For Giannis and change?
I can imagine this being like the 04' situation where we traded all of the kids (expect for Wade) for Shaq. Bam is clearly our 'Wade'.
27 YO Bam with an overlapping skillset as Giannis except worse than Giannis at everything except being a more versatile defender...
yeah that is not the same complimentary pairing as an unstoppable two way scoring guard complimented by a dominant paint force in Shaq. Sadly the better option would be replacing Bam with Giannis and keeping the spacing.