DropStep wrote:We got our own pick back in the Lavine/Fox trade. Lonzo was a 1 for 1 player trade. So was Caruso. 1 for 1 player trades seem pretty rare, no? It's almost like AKME would just rather not deal with picks, especially other people's picks, whose value you have no control over. Just keep them, we're good? lol. I think and hope that it's kind of a joke when people say AK hates draft picks, but it's starting to feel kind of weird. Both of these trades are perfectly even? Not even a second going either direction, or a swap of seconds? He doesn't seem to be looking for lottery tickets or to swindle anyone for value, it feels like he's just looking for fit, to the scheme and to the timeline. But one of his prime duties is negotiating for value, both with players and other teams. This is a cheap shot... but is he doing it?
AK doesn’t value picks at all! Regards of what adjective you want to use its clear he doesn’t want them. The irony to that if his laborious behind did he’d prb be able to off load a Vuc or Carter and free up a Roster spot to allow us to keep more young talent. And perhaps facilitate better trades for better returns, than this 1:1 bs we’re doing.
But AK clearly has a issue with picks. The Giddy trade in itself should’ve netted you at the minimum 1 pick from an origination overflowing with draft picks they can’t use over the next What decade? For a player at the time with low value who most teams know they’re trying to move.
Meaning I know you want my player more than I want yours so guess what ill do if you give me that player plus a 1st or 2 2nd’s Ill take him off your hands for my guy you want and you negotiate from there.
But who knows if this is attempted. The outcome remains we get no picks. And don’t have much to show from losing valuable talent in regards to future assets.
When a more competent GM would have cooped a treasure trove of assets given the amount of talent we let go.