Onus wrote:whatisacenter wrote:Onus wrote:Why? Turner wasn't even closing games for the Pacers and was being benched for Obi Toppin.
He is tall, shoots 3's and blocks shots.
Draymond was jogging around and getting used like a bar of soap last time we saw him.
TBH I'm not sure Turner is better than Horford definitely not 20M better let alone dropping Draymond for him.
Draymond quits when he knows he doesn't have a chance. Fair
Turner struggled against OKC, as do most centers. Particularly, when OKC went small. I thought Turner was a primary reason why they went away from the 2 big lineup, even before the series started. He really tailed off as the series progressed but his success is more PG dependent that anyone else on that team. Which makes sense considering he's a C that can't dribble. He OWNED Chet and Hartenstein in the games Indy won, particularly on the defensive end.
He's a flawed player but he's certainly far better than Horford. Just look at the success he had against MIL and Cle, two teams that had to play big. With his shooting and rim protection, he'd be an awesome defensive big next to a great defensive QB like dray. I wouldn't have moved dray for him but pairing those two would have been amazing. The argument that we already had the #1 defense post jimmy trade and should look for shot creation and 3pt shooting instead of giving up moody and buddy does make sense. @ 26M/yr, it's a great contract for MIL, as well.