DOT wrote:j4remi wrote:For a team with virtually no flexibility, the Knicks did pretty good. The bench can be pretty dynamic now.
We essentially traded Payne and Precious for Clarkson and Yabusele
I'll just say it, I think both of those are just straight up upgrades, but even if they're not, I don't think they're worse
So if we make 1 more solid bench addition for the minimum, we're good. And by that I mean essentially we need someone to replace Shamet, which I really don't think would be difficult to do even with just the minimum
Then best case scenario, you might get something out of Kolek/Dadiet/Hukporti as well, which we don't need but would be nice to have.
Yeah, I can't picture the bench depth being worse after this. There's plenty of time and cap space is fading quick for everyone, so I think some options will pop up.
Does this kill trade avenues because of the apron? I could see them trying to flip Mitch if depending on Huk's development and how much small ball the next coach intends to play.