ImageImageImage

Schroder's gone

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

uncleoswald
Junior
Posts: 281
And1: 178
Joined: May 16, 2009
Location: Expect the unexpected.

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#41 » by uncleoswald » Tue Jul 1, 2025 4:57 pm

I'm disappointed that we lost Schroder and didn't get Monk back in return. I would have been happy either way - bringing back Schroder or S&Ting for Monk.

Schroder's contract looks pretty OK to me. It's not a situation like NAW's, where I was happy we didn't get him.

So, Duncan Robinson maybe? That's a pretty mediocre second prize.

PG: Cunningham/Sasser
SG: Ivey/LeVert/Lanier
SF: Thompson/Robinson/Holland
PF: Harris/Fontecchio/Klintman
C: Duren/Stewart/Reed
"A moment later, the two of us were millions of miles up in outer space ..."
the_l_train
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,925
And1: 315
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: G-Rap

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#42 » by the_l_train » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:03 pm

uncleoswald wrote:I'm disappointed that we lost Schroder and didn't get Monk back in return. I would have been happy either way - bringing back Schroder or S&Ting for Monk.

Schroder's contract looks pretty OK to me. It's not a situation like NAW's, where I was happy we didn't get him.

So, Duncan Robinson maybe? That's a pretty mediocre second prize.

PG: Cunningham/Sasser
SG: Ivey/LeVert/Lanier
SF: Thompson/Robinson/Holland
PF: Harris/Fontecchio/Klintman
C: Duren/Stewart/Reed


PF: Harris/Fontecchio/Klintman.........thats gotta be worst PF depth in the league.

Trajan gotta be feeling the heat right now. Hope he orchestrating something right now, that bench is ass.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,532
And1: 18,363
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#43 » by Snakebites » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:07 pm

Disappointed we didn’t get an asset, even though I was not wild about the fit of Monk.

Hopefully there are still other avenues to improve this team. The current roster feels like a step backwards.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#44 » by thesack12 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:10 pm

TPA wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
flow wrote:
Schroder was our 2nd best player in the playoffs. He's a dog and he rises to the pressure. And his arrival here added a dynamic the team hadn't had. If that's not hard to come by, then go get it, because now it's not here.

.

That says more about the team around him's performance, more than it does about Schroder.

Lots of folks around here didn't want Schroder at the TDL..... Because he's Dennis Schroder

Is that right? I don't remember it that way... Maybe some, but I think most posters here understood the need for a good backup PG. Schroder was that, and it didn't cost Detroit much to take him on...


Yeah, there was definitely a consensus that Pistons needed a backup PG. Ball and Sexton were the fanbase's darlings at the time.

When rumors started to leak out that Schroder might be headed to Detroit as part of that 4 team trade, I remember some folks weren't thrilled.

In any event, your comment of "didn't take much to take him on," is noteworthy. Guys of Schroder's caliber are frequently picked up for cheap. We are a long way from the season starting, let alone locking in the roster for remainder of the season/playoffs.
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#45 » by thesack12 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:11 pm

oldncreaky wrote:
thesack12 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:Beasley did not play like a journeyman last year. Exactly 3 players in NBA history have had seasons where they hit more threes than him- the value of what he did for us off-ball is massive. Not having it will be a loss.


A loss, sure. A catastrophic team breaking type of loss, I'm not so sure.

Journeyman type guys frequently have spiked production/performances (coincidentally those frequently happen in contract years.) If Beasley proved to be a consistent asset, he wouldn't be constantly passed around the league like a hot potato. Especially when he's never been all that expensive.


Agree.

Schroeder had a good run in DET. However, that is typical of Dennis at the end of a contract. Dennis has the talent to be one of the better 6th-man, but at each of his last half dozen stops, he has chafed whenever he doesn't get to start etc.

Beasley had a career year. I wasn't really expecting him to repeat it, either on the Pistons or elsewhere. I think he was/is good value at the TPMLE or below, and was hoping we could keep him on a nice contract, but I'd be leery of paying more.


+1
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 21,270
And1: 2,712
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#46 » by thesack12 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:15 pm

Billl wrote:In terms of team building, I don't think it's necessary to sign all of our role players back. But we do need to keep signing guys who can play those particular roles. Having some quality floor spacers around cade is the absolute bare minimum we need to expect.


This!

Schroder and Beasley are not irreplaceable talents, and their roles won't be super difficult to fill.

Some people are making it seem replacing Schroder/Beasley is a code red similar to having to try and replace Ben Wallace in '05.
User avatar
Rip32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 347
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#47 » by Rip32 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:16 pm

The kings can keep Dennis and Malik. Monk contract sucks ass. We will not miss Dennis. The kings willl be losers
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,984
And1: 9,781
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#48 » by bstein14 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:24 pm

Snakebites wrote:
Crymson wrote:
Snakebites wrote:It looks to me like we operated without cap space. No room MLE. Caris got non-taxpayer MLE money.


The Pistons can operate over the cap only if they take back a significant salary in exchange for Schroder. They'll otherwise be a cap space team by default -- unless they manage to swing something highly improbable sign-and-trade with a big one-plus-non-guaranteed contract to THJ -- and LeVert and Reed will fit right into cap space.

Teams can't just *choose* to operate above the cap; they need to actually *be* above the cap in order to do so.

I thought we might be over without Dennis. Haven’t looked at it all that closely.


We can be an over the cap team either way if we want. Beasley counts $7.2 million towards the cap and THJ counts $24.3 million until we either renounce his rights or he signs elsewhere.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,532
And1: 18,363
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#49 » by Snakebites » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:43 pm

bstein14 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:
Crymson wrote:
The Pistons can operate over the cap only if they take back a significant salary in exchange for Schroder. They'll otherwise be a cap space team by default -- unless they manage to swing something highly improbable sign-and-trade with a big one-plus-non-guaranteed contract to THJ -- and LeVert and Reed will fit right into cap space.

Teams can't just *choose* to operate above the cap; they need to actually *be* above the cap in order to do so.

I thought we might be over without Dennis. Haven’t looked at it all that closely.


We can be an over the cap team either way if we want. Beasley counts $7.2 million towards the cap and THJ counts $24.3 million until we either renounce his rights or he signs elsewhere.

Ah okay. I thought I remembered that the cap hold exceeds the players previous salary.

We could “choose” to be over the cap by not renouncing him.

The way Crymson was talking it sounded like he knew more- that even with that we were below the cap.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,984
And1: 9,781
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#50 » by bstein14 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:46 pm

Snakebites wrote:
bstein14 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:I thought we might be over without Dennis. Haven’t looked at it all that closely.


We can be an over the cap team either way if we want. Beasley counts $7.2 million towards the cap and THJ counts $24.3 million until we either renounce his rights or he signs elsewhere.

Ah okay. I thought I remembered that the cap hold exceeds the players previous salary.

We could “choose” to be over the cap by not renouncing him.

The way Crymson was talking it sounded like he knew more- that even with that we were below the cap.


The MLE also counts towards the cap $14.1 million unless we renounce it essentially to become a below the cap team. You get the MLE even if you're below the cap as long as you're less than $14.1 million below the cap.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,532
And1: 18,363
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#51 » by Snakebites » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:49 pm

bstein14 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:
bstein14 wrote:
We can be an over the cap team either way if we want. Beasley counts $7.2 million towards the cap and THJ counts $24.3 million until we either renounce his rights or he signs elsewhere.

Ah okay. I thought I remembered that the cap hold exceeds the players previous salary.

We could “choose” to be over the cap by not renouncing him.

The way Crymson was talking it sounded like he knew more- that even with that we were below the cap.


The MLE also counts towards the cap $14.1 million unless we renounce it essentially to become a below the cap team. You get the MLE even if you're below the cap as long as you're less than $14.1 million below the cap.


Yeah I understand that. If we’d renounced everyone we would have been above that 14.1 mark in terms of space. Guess there wasn’t anyone worth that.

My guess is we explore trade options and if we find nothing we re-sign THJ.
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,979
And1: 2,517
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#52 » by DetroitSho » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:51 pm

uncleoswald wrote:I'm disappointed that we lost Schroder and didn't get Monk back in return. I would have been happy either way - bringing back Schroder or S&Ting for Monk.

Schroder's contract looks pretty OK to me. It's not a situation like NAW's, where I was happy we didn't get him.

So, Duncan Robinson maybe? That's a pretty mediocre second prize.

PG: Cunningham/Sasser
SG: Ivey/LeVert/Lanier
SF: Thompson/Robinson/Holland
PF: Harris/Fontecchio/Klintman
C: Duren/Stewart/Reed
How is 4 years at $62 million undesirable for a big wing that can shoot, handle, and defend but you would've been good with 3 years and $60 million for a short, streaky combo guard that doesn't defend? What world are we living in?

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
LaSheed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,911
And1: 830
Joined: Jun 02, 2016
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#53 » by LaSheed » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:54 pm

Don't forget Schroeder also turned down that 80 million contract with LA years back.

3/45 is a good reason to leave.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,984
And1: 9,781
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#54 » by bstein14 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 5:59 pm

Snakebites wrote:
bstein14 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:Ah okay. I thought I remembered that the cap hold exceeds the players previous salary.

We could “choose” to be over the cap by not renouncing him.

The way Crymson was talking it sounded like he knew more- that even with that we were below the cap.


The MLE also counts towards the cap $14.1 million unless we renounce it essentially to become a below the cap team. You get the MLE even if you're below the cap as long as you're less than $14.1 million below the cap.


Yeah I understand that. If we’d renounced everyone we would have been above that 14.1 mark in terms of space. Guess there wasn’t anyone worth that.

My guess is we explore trade options and if we find nothing we re-sign THJ.


I think its possible we had a deal lined up to trade Font to offer Naz Reid a big deal..... or we may have operated as a below the cap team if we could have made an offer sheet to Aldama..... but by the time FA hit that was no longer an option for us. We could have offered Aldama about 4 years $80 million if we wanted him to be our PF of the future.... but Memphis likely still would have matched it.


John Collins will be a FA next summer and he shares an agent with Cade... he's a realistic PF of the future type target but we'll almost certainly only have MLE $ to operate with next summer so with a 7% increase we'd be able to offer him essentially $15.1, $15.8, $16.5, $17.2 over four seasons total about 4 years $65 million. Here clearly isn't perfect but he would slot in decently with his skillset between Duren and Ausar in a starting front court.

19 and 8 shooting 40% from deep and 28 years old next summer he might be too good to get for MLE $.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,984
And1: 9,781
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#55 » by bstein14 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 6:00 pm

LaSheed wrote:Don't forget Schroeder also turned down that 80 million contract with LA years back.

3/45 is a good reason to leave.


And a starting job and the Kings (or whatever team he is on assuming he doesnt' get waived) will have full bird rights 3 summers from now.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,532
And1: 18,363
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#56 » by Snakebites » Tue Jul 1, 2025 6:01 pm

There's no way we were keeping Schroder with the Kings willing to offer that.

And at the end of the day they didn't have much reason to just give us Monk. And TL was right to balk at giving up significant assets for him (IMO).
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#57 » by coordinator0 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 6:07 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Rip32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 347
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#58 » by Rip32 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 6:25 pm

bstein14 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:
bstein14 wrote:
The MLE also counts towards the cap $14.1 million unless we renounce it essentially to become a below the cap team. You get the MLE even if you're below the cap as long as you're less than $14.1 million below the cap.


Yeah I understand that. If we’d renounced everyone we would have been above that 14.1 mark in terms of space. Guess there wasn’t anyone worth that.

My guess is we explore trade options and if we find nothing we re-sign THJ.


I think its possible we had a deal lined up to trade Font to offer Naz Reid a big deal..... or we may have operated as a below the cap team if we could have made an offer sheet to Aldama..... but by the time FA hit that was no longer an option for us. We could have offered Aldama about 4 years $80 million if we wanted him to be our PF of the future.... but Memphis likely still would have matched it.


John Collins will be a FA next summer and he shares an agent with Cade... he's a realistic PF of the future type target but we'll almost certainly only have MLE $ to operate with next summer so with a 7% increase we'd be able to offer him essentially $15.1, $15.8, $16.5, $17.2 over four seasons total about 4 years $65 million. Here clearly isn't perfect but he would slot in decently with his skillset between Duren and Ausar in a starting front court.

19 and 8 shooting 40% from deep and 28 years old next summer he might be too good to get for MLE $.

Seems like we could trade for Collins now.

Cade
Ivey
Ausar
Collins
Duren

Bench
Beef
Harris
Holland
Levert
Sasser

This a championship squad
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 2,036
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#59 » by Canadafan » Tue Jul 1, 2025 6:38 pm

^championship?^
Thats a little extreme I'd say
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,984
And1: 9,781
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#60 » by bstein14 » Tue Jul 1, 2025 7:05 pm

Rip32 wrote:
bstein14 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:
Yeah I understand that. If we’d renounced everyone we would have been above that 14.1 mark in terms of space. Guess there wasn’t anyone worth that.

My guess is we explore trade options and if we find nothing we re-sign THJ.


I think its possible we had a deal lined up to trade Font to offer Naz Reid a big deal..... or we may have operated as a below the cap team if we could have made an offer sheet to Aldama..... but by the time FA hit that was no longer an option for us. We could have offered Aldama about 4 years $80 million if we wanted him to be our PF of the future.... but Memphis likely still would have matched it.


John Collins will be a FA next summer and he shares an agent with Cade... he's a realistic PF of the future type target but we'll almost certainly only have MLE $ to operate with next summer so with a 7% increase we'd be able to offer him essentially $15.1, $15.8, $16.5, $17.2 over four seasons total about 4 years $65 million. Here clearly isn't perfect but he would slot in decently with his skillset between Duren and Ausar in a starting front court.

19 and 8 shooting 40% from deep and 28 years old next summer he might be too good to get for MLE $.

Seems like we could trade for Collins now.

Cade
Ivey
Ausar
Collins
Duren

Bench
Beef
Harris
Holland
Levert
Sasser

This a championship squad


We'd have to make it a three team sign-and-trade with Monk going to Utah, Schroeder/Font going to Sacramento, and Collins going to Detroit.

Otherwise we don't have enough salaries to send off to get Collins who makes $26.58 million this season.

Return to Detroit Pistons