Repeat 3-peat wrote:Miami beat writers have downplayed the Kuminga interest. If true, Kuminga will likely be a Bull, assuming that the interest from Chicago is also true.
They also may just keep him.
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Repeat 3-peat wrote:Miami beat writers have downplayed the Kuminga interest. If true, Kuminga will likely be a Bull, assuming that the interest from Chicago is also true.
NecessaryEvil wrote:Repeat 3-peat wrote:Miami beat writers have downplayed the Kuminga interest. If true, Kuminga will likely be a Bull, assuming that the interest from Chicago is also true.
They also may just keep him.
Clint Eastwood wrote:What would a S+T of Vuc and Ayo for Kuminga look like? What would be Kuminga salary? I think this might be a pair of players that could benefit GS and have been rumored to be on the block for Bulls. Makes the most sense if the money makes sense.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
WindyCityBorn wrote:Am2626 wrote:CobysHairpick wrote:I'm not even thinking about this season. If the Bulls sign Kuminga to an extension then will Essengue see 30 mins next season as he should? He should be playing next to Matas (and Giddey) as much as possible to establish chemistry. If Kuminga signs for more than 2 years which I'm sure he wants then you're basically pushing Essengue's minutes to his second contract which doesn't make any sense seeing as how he should be playing as much as possible next season.
No disagreement on how transactions by the Heat and Bulls are viewed around the league. Personally, while I'm concerned about Kuminga's 3pt%, his athleticism and aggression would be fun to watch in this uptempo scheme. That said, I'd rather keep a starting spot open for Essengue next season.
Isn’t Essengue more of a 4 or even 5? At 18 he could still grow taller. He’s already 6’10”. He needs to add weight. I don’t see him overlapping with Kuminga who is a 3 and can play the 2 and 4. Also Kuminga shot 40% from 3 in the playoffs when he actually got playing time after Curry got hurt. You can’t keep spots open for unproven raw players. The Bulls need to acquire as much talent as they can right now.
He is not a 5 at all. Plays nothing like a 5.
WesPeace wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:Am2626 wrote:
Isn’t Essengue more of a 4 or even 5? At 18 he could still grow taller. He’s already 6’10”. He needs to add weight. I don’t see him overlapping with Kuminga who is a 3 and can play the 2 and 4. Also Kuminga shot 40% from 3 in the playoffs when he actually got playing time after Curry got hurt. You can’t keep spots open for unproven raw players. The Bulls need to acquire as much talent as they can right now.
He is not a 5 at all. Plays nothing like a 5.
Yes, he plays like 3 or 4 for now.. long athletic wing!
BUT we have seen multiple times that NBA execs and management f.... up players with wrong development plans, PWill best case lately with Bulls! I could easily see especially Billy D looking at Noa, seeing tall skinny dude and he wants to add some muscle on him and play him at 5, because you know.. he is tall enough!
If Noa can adjust and build up to play athletic 5, wouldnt be that bad.. If Holmgren can play center,so could Essengue. But at the moment we seen him more as Giannis from Temu option hehe, athletic four.
I always said I see Buzelis more as natural fit at 4, because of defensive instincts,. We shall see what Bulls see in their plans going forward. I dont want to see Matas bulk up and playing center, ever never, thats for sure, 1000% no!
ThreeMileAllan wrote:Can someone explain why the Base Year Compensation rule exists?
I don't understand the thinking behind implementing it.
MrSparkle wrote:ThreeMileAllan wrote:Can someone explain why the Base Year Compensation rule exists?
I don't understand the thinking behind implementing it.
Maybe to give rich/over-the-cap teams less leverage when acquiring new RFAs?
(Forces them to add 2x the cap hit for S&T’ing for a RFA).
But I dunno. It also hampers the RFA’s original team’s trade options.
I don’t get it, myself.
ThreeMileAllan wrote:Can someone explain why the Base Year Compensation rule exists?
I don't understand the thinking behind implementing it.
GoBlue72391 wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:Am2626 wrote:
Isn’t Essengue more of a 4 or even 5? At 18 he could still grow taller. He’s already 6’10”. He needs to add weight. I don’t see him overlapping with Kuminga who is a 3 and can play the 2 and 4. Also Kuminga shot 40% from 3 in the playoffs when he actually got playing time after Curry got hurt. You can’t keep spots open for unproven raw players. The Bulls need to acquire as much talent as they can right now.
He is not a 5 at all. Plays nothing like a 5.
Right now he plays almost exactly like a 5, we just hope he can develop into a 4/3 because that's where his value lies.
Him becoming a 5 is a decent fallback plan though if he never develops into the PF/SF like we're all hoping.
WindyCityBorn wrote:GoBlue72391 wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:
He is not a 5 at all. Plays nothing like a 5.
Right now he plays almost exactly like a 5, we just hope he can develop into a 4/3 because that's where his value lies.
Him becoming a 5 is a decent fallback plan though if he never develops into the PF/SF like we're all hoping.
I don’t know what tape you watched if you think he plays like 5.