TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Doesn't sound very solid to me.
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
stuporman wrote:Yabuty an upgrade over Precious
Clarkson an upgrade over Terry Johnson
Now the Knicks need one of 3Pac, MObi or Dink to step up to be that extra wing they need.
thebuzzardman wrote:stuporman wrote:Yabuty an upgrade over Precious
Clarkson an upgrade over Terry Johnson
Now the Knicks need one of 3Pac, MObi or Dink to step up to be that extra wing they need.
ctorres wrote:
hey! thought of you when I saw this since you and me are both team LeBron, lol
Knick4Real wrote:ctorres wrote:
hey! thought of you when I saw this since you and me are both team LeBron, lol
PLEASE NO!!!
I DO NOT want Lebron using us to cement HIS OWN image in history!!
IF he came here and IF he won a championship, the narrative would be all about him. The headlines would be that "LEBRON won" instead of "the KNICKS won." There would always be an asterisk after the win, and the history books would be all about how Lebron saved us.
I hope this rumor is false. No thank you, Lebron!!
Knick4Real wrote:ctorres wrote:
hey! thought of you when I saw this since you and me are both team LeBron, lol
PLEASE NO!!!
I DO NOT want Lebron using us to cement HIS OWN image in history!!
IF he came here and IF he won a championship, the narrative would be all about him. The headlines would be that "LEBRON won" instead of "the KNICKS won." There would always be an asterisk after the win, and the history books would be all about how Lebron saved us.
I hope this rumor is false. No thank you, Lebron!!
Capn'O wrote:Knick4Real wrote:ctorres wrote:
hey! thought of you when I saw this since you and me are both team LeBron, lol
PLEASE NO!!!
I DO NOT want Lebron using us to cement HIS OWN image in history!!
IF he came here and IF he won a championship, the narrative would be all about him. The headlines would be that "LEBRON won" instead of "the KNICKS won." There would always be an asterisk after the win, and the history books would be all about how Lebron saved us.
I hope this rumor is false. No thank you, Lebron!!
Wait... your main concern with acquiring a 40 year old Lebron is what the narrative would be if we won a championship with him?
Knick4Real wrote:Capn'O wrote:Knick4Real wrote:
PLEASE NO!!!
I DO NOT want Lebron using us to cement HIS OWN image in history!!
IF he came here and IF he won a championship, the narrative would be all about him. The headlines would be that "LEBRON won" instead of "the KNICKS won." There would always be an asterisk after the win, and the history books would be all about how Lebron saved us.
I hope this rumor is false. No thank you, Lebron!!
Wait... your main concern with acquiring a 40 year old Lebron is what the narrative would be if we won a championship with him?
YEP!
The narrative IMO would be about how Lebron "did it again" and "ended his career on a high note," instead of how the KNICKS were able to win a chip after a 50+ year drought.
I don't want a championship by any means necessary. I also don't want Lebron using us for one final hurrah.
I'm Knick4Real and I approve this message!!
omerome wrote:Huge pass on LeBron.
Can the championship that we win have nothing to do with that man?
No thank you.
Capn'O wrote:Knick4Real wrote:Capn'O wrote:
Wait... your main concern with acquiring a 40 year old Lebron is what the narrative would be if we won a championship with him?
YEP!
The narrative IMO would be about how Lebron "did it again" and "ended his career on a high note," instead of how the KNICKS were able to win a chip after a 50+ year drought.
I don't want a championship by any means necessary. I also don't want Lebron using us for one final hurrah.
I'm Knick4Real and I approve this message!!
Ok. So my main concerns would be that he makes 50 million dollars and hasn't led the Lakers anywhere meaningful in 5 years with fairly stacked rosters. I think we'd worsen our team to get him. He's not able to bring two way prowess for extended periods anymore.
Over the long term it would be devastating and Mitch and OG would make the Lakers contenders. **** no.
Capn'O wrote:Knick4Real wrote:Capn'O wrote:
Wait... your main concern with acquiring a 40 year old Lebron is what the narrative would be if we won a championship with him?
YEP!
The narrative IMO would be about how Lebron "did it again" and "ended his career on a high note," instead of how the KNICKS were able to win a chip after a 50+ year drought.
I don't want a championship by any means necessary. I also don't want Lebron using us for one final hurrah.
I'm Knick4Real and I approve this message!!
Ok. So my main concerns would be that he makes 50 million dollars and hasn't led the Lakers anywhere meaningful in 5 years with fairly stacked rosters. I think we'd worsen our team to get him. He's not able to bring two way prowess for extended periods anymore.
KnixinSix wrote:Mikal, Hart and Robinson for BRONALDINO
https://sports.yahoo.com/article/knicks-may-acquire-lakers-101-220712851.html