Image ImageImage Image

Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

samwana
General Manager
Posts: 9,995
And1: 2,585
Joined: Jul 24, 2002
Location: Munich (Germany)
 

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#601 » by samwana » Thu Jul 3, 2025 5:37 pm

KissedByaRose1 wrote:Where does the bundesliga rank compared to NCAA and Euroleague in your guys opinions? Every time i want to get really excited about this guy it's tough not to notice a lot of the guys look like they're 5'11.
I think the Bundesliga is to the spanish league like the g-league is to the NBA.

That's why I want to see Noa play against NBA players before I will compare him to some stars in the NBA.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,632
And1: 6,889
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#602 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 5:40 pm

Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I said the exact same on draft night and was crucified for it. Good but not great length.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,835
And1: 15,262
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#603 » by kodo » Thu Jul 3, 2025 5:45 pm

Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach. Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I do love wingspan, but it shouldn't be a driving factor. I'm sure wingspan is why Matas dropped and these prospects were drafted ahead of him:
Tidjuane Saluan: 7' 2"
Cody Williams: 7' 1"
Ron Holland: 6' 11"
Buzelis: 6' 10"

Everyone drafting a SF ahead of Buzelis that year blew that draft. Ainge fired his entire draft team over that 2024.

I don't think Noa was a pure, best physical attributes pick. I think that was Joan Beringer, 7' 5" wingspan with better athleticism/agility than Maluach. I think Noa had good physicals but AK also looks for intangibles like his cutting, off-ball movement, connective passing on plays, etc.. These are all the things that Matas had over everyone else even though his stats sucked and his measurements were not elite.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,632
And1: 6,889
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#604 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 5:52 pm

kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach.

Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

The only people I've seen make the Giannis comps are fans and questionable Twitter accounts. I've read a lot of scouting reports since we drafted him and haven't heard anything in the realm of Giannis, though it's possible I missed it.

The Ringer has Tayshaun Prince/Bilal Coulibaly/Darius Bazley/Isaac Bonga

NBA.com has Nic Batum/Al-Faroq Aminu

NBADraft.net has Donyell Marshall/Al-Faroq Aminu

NBA Draft Room has Ed O'Bannon/Al Harrington

That's just a quick glance. Fans just go nuts with the comps and upsides anytime we draft anyone.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 69,501
And1: 36,960
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#605 » by fleet » Thu Jul 3, 2025 5:58 pm

kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach.

Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I haven’t delved deeply into draft numbers in recent years. “Hand width” is a new one on me.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,632
And1: 6,889
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#606 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 6:08 pm

fleet wrote:
kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach.

Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I haven’t delved deeply into draft numbers in recent years. “Hand width” is a new one on me.

I'm more interested in the "spinal alignment" metric.
Senor Chang
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,324
And1: 1,293
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
Contact:

Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#607 » by Senor Chang » Thu Jul 3, 2025 6:52 pm

kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach. Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I do love wingspan, but it shouldn't be a driving factor. I'm sure wingspan is why Matas dropped and these prospects were drafted ahead of him:
Tidjuane Saluan: 7' 2"
Cody Williams: 7' 1"
Ron Holland: 6' 11"
Buzelis: 6' 10"

Everyone drafting a SF ahead of Buzelis that year blew that draft. Ainge fired his entire draft team over that 2024.

I don't think Noa was a pure, best physical attributes pick. I think that was Joan Beringer, 7' 5" wingspan with better athleticism/agility than Maluach. I think Noa had good physicals but AK also looks for intangibles like his cutting, off-ball movement, connective passing on plays, etc.. These are all the things that Matas had over everyone else even though his stats sucked and his measurements were not elite.

Even siakim has a 7’3” wingspan. Most media outlets avoided the Giannis comparisons but we’re seeing it often among bulls fans online.

Matas may have a short wingspan for his height but he is more offensively skilled/talented than Essengue at this point. Matas succeeding doesn’t mean wingspan doesn’t matter. Jalen williams isn’t the defensive beast he is if his wingspan is 6’8” as oppose to 7’2”. Probably still good but 7’2” wingspan on a 6’5” guy is absolutely freakish.

I do like the Tayshaun Prince comparison at least in terms of body type. That’s probably the closest comp physically to Essengue. Tayshaun however was a very skilled player. He was a point forward and could shoot. Hopefully Noa can refine his skills over time. I believe he can.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk no
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,632
And1: 6,889
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#608 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 6:58 pm

Senor Chang wrote:
kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach. Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I do love wingspan, but it shouldn't be a driving factor. I'm sure wingspan is why Matas dropped and these prospects were drafted ahead of him:
Tidjuane Saluan: 7' 2"
Cody Williams: 7' 1"
Ron Holland: 6' 11"
Buzelis: 6' 10"

Everyone drafting a SF ahead of Buzelis that year blew that draft. Ainge fired his entire draft team over that 2024.

I don't think Noa was a pure, best physical attributes pick. I think that was Joan Beringer, 7' 5" wingspan with better athleticism/agility than Maluach. I think Noa had good physicals but AK also looks for intangibles like his cutting, off-ball movement, connective passing on plays, etc.. These are all the things that Matas had over everyone else even though his stats sucked and his measurements were not elite.

Even siakim has a 7’3” wingspan. Most media outlets avoided the Giannis comparisons but we’re seeing it often among bulls fans online.

Matas may have a short wingspan for his height but he is more offensively skilled/talented than Essengue at this point. Matas succeeding doesn’t mean wingspan doesn’t matter. Jalen williams isn’t the defensive beast he is if his wingspan is 6’8” as oppose to 7’2”. Probably still good but 7’2” wingspan on a 6’5” guy is absolutely freakish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's what I don't understand. You can't compare a prospect to a one-of-a-kind generational freak of nature if he doesn't have those same freakish measurements and attributes.

Good or even very good height/length/athleticism combination does not equate to Giannis 2.0, even if his development goes perfectly.

It's just overzealous fan hoopla over exciting themselves over the shiny new toy.
Senor Chang
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,324
And1: 1,293
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
Contact:

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#609 » by Senor Chang » Thu Jul 3, 2025 7:07 pm

kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach. Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I do love wingspan, but it shouldn't be a driving factor. I'm sure wingspan is why Matas dropped and these prospects were drafted ahead of him:
Tidjuane Saluan: 7' 2"
Cody Williams: 7' 1"
Ron Holland: 6' 11"
Buzelis: 6' 10"

Everyone drafting a SF ahead of Buzelis that year blew that draft. Ainge fired his entire draft team over that 2024.

I don't think Noa was a pure, best physical attributes pick. I think that was Joan Beringer, 7' 5" wingspan with better athleticism/agility than Maluach. I think Noa had good physicals but AK also looks for intangibles like his cutting, off-ball movement, connective passing on plays, etc.. These are all the things that Matas had over everyone else even though his stats sucked and his measurements were not elite.

And speaking of Salaun and Cody williams, they were both drafted based on potential due to their length. Are we going to crap on Essengue if he too is a project that has a less than stellar rookie year? Of course not. Id give those other guys the same chance to develop their game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao
sco
RealGM
Posts: 26,875
And1: 8,972
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#610 » by sco » Thu Jul 3, 2025 7:13 pm

Senor Chang wrote:
kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach. Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I do love wingspan, but it shouldn't be a driving factor. I'm sure wingspan is why Matas dropped and these prospects were drafted ahead of him:
Tidjuane Saluan: 7' 2"
Cody Williams: 7' 1"
Ron Holland: 6' 11"
Buzelis: 6' 10"

Everyone drafting a SF ahead of Buzelis that year blew that draft. Ainge fired his entire draft team over that 2024.

I don't think Noa was a pure, best physical attributes pick. I think that was Joan Beringer, 7' 5" wingspan with better athleticism/agility than Maluach. I think Noa had good physicals but AK also looks for intangibles like his cutting, off-ball movement, connective passing on plays, etc.. These are all the things that Matas had over everyone else even though his stats sucked and his measurements were not elite.

And speaking of Salaun and Cody williams, they were both drafted based on potential due to their length. Are we going to crap on Essengue if he too is a project that has a less than stellar rookie year? Of course not. Id give those other guys the same chance to develop their game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Length isn't everything (as I tell my wife ;) ), but seriously, guys with long arms, while having more reach to defend, often have more challenges with ball handling and shooting. Also, if you look at Noa (similar to Noah), he has very narrow shoulders, but he may have longer arms than some guys with longer wingspans. While big shoulders matter in terms of boxing out, narrow shoulders gives guys better ability to slip between guys when getting to the basket for shots and rebounds.
:clap:
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,876
And1: 3,578
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#611 » by MGB8 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 7:23 pm

I’ve used the Giannis comp as an absolute upside, style comp.

Essengue has freakish speed for his size along with very good but not elite length (9’2 reach, 7’1 wingspan). The one offensive skill that he has shown is leveraging his combination of speed and length to drive and cut and finish inside over opponents. It’s his comparative advantage. It is the same comparative advantage that Giannis has - just without Giannis’ strength or ball handling. We don’t actually know Giannis’ reach but his wingspan is listed at an elite 7’4.

That said, measurements don’t really tell you that much. Jimmy Butler is a “T-Rex” short arm guy. So is solid defending Davion Mitchell. And Josh Hart. Wingspan is a plus but far from dispositive on defense (or offense).

Honestly, that is my biggest fear with the Esengue pick - that AKME again went with physical traits - which Dalen Terry and Julian Phillips and THT also have with (wingspan and/or reach) rather than relying on a combo of eye-test / scouting and production / statistical elements (which, while not dispositive, send flags or other signals).

Anyway, if Essengue can get a lot stronger (and I don’t think he is as narrow / limited as some here; I remember Caboclo coming in and several years later, too) while keeping his speed, and improve his handle a bit (but not necessarily a ton), that ability to straight line drive 3 steps from 3 to around rim and finish over people - a la Giannis - will be what sets Essengue apart.

He has no other meaningful skills or advantages to speak of. That is the key to his game. If you don’t think that will develop, you don’t pick him because basically you are at 90% bust risk given thin frame, no established shot — would make him and would pick who should have gone only late in the first.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,876
And1: 3,578
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#612 » by MGB8 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 7:38 pm

Caveat to the above, as well. The comparison to Giannis does not mean anyone thinks Essengue will actually end up the best player in the league or top 5. It is a comparison of the limited number of players who are 6’10+ who have elite speed and quickness.

I mean, you could point to JJJ or Stoudamire or Kemp before he got fat, but those guys don’t / didn’t really do much dribbling / creation from the top, and Essengue has flashed a little bit of that. Tyrus and Darius Miles were smaller. There just aren’t that many comps for that style.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,627
And1: 879
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#613 » by Almost Retired » Thu Jul 3, 2025 7:41 pm

Noa is plenty long enough and so is Matas. Pair them with a decent Center like Tomislav Ivisic (7' 1" height and wingspan) who can shoot and we have a potentially great front line measuring 6' - 10", 6' - 11" (and possibly still growing), and 7' 1". Ivisic gives you the outside shooting that Noa might not develop. Then you add in Giddey at 6' - 8" and Coby at 6' - 5" and you have a very long starting lineup in 2 or 3 years. Good luck finding passing lanes against them.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,876
And1: 3,578
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#614 » by MGB8 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 7:44 pm

kodo wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.


Agreed although Noa has a 7' 1" wingspan, he's still quite long for a PF but not as generationally freakish like Giannis & Kawhi. I believe he also had some of the widest hands measured this year, wider than Maluach's. TBH I did not see any Giannis comps so I wonder if we're just beating on a straw man. I liked the Tayshaun Prince comp, the other "best case" comp was Siakam. I never saw a report or even opinion saying even best case here is an MVP.

Masai didn't have final say, this year, it was Webster. Everyone had Noa mocked to Toronto based on Masai having final call. Webster is definitely not working on project kids, he drafted one of the most NBA ready guys in CMB and double downed on keeping Poeltl for over $100M. I do think a lot of people thought that if Masai was in charge of the draft they would have taken either Noa or Maluach. Even CMB looked shocked the Raptors took him.

I do love wingspan, but it shouldn't be a driving factor. I'm sure wingspan is why Matas dropped and these prospects were drafted ahead of him:
Tidjuane Saluan: 7' 2"
Cody Williams: 7' 1"
Ron Holland: 6' 11"
Buzelis: 6' 10"

Everyone drafting a SF ahead of Buzelis that year blew that draft. Ainge fired his entire draft team over that 2024.

I don't think Noa was a pure, best physical attributes pick. I think that was Joan Beringer, 7' 5" wingspan with better athleticism/agility than Maluach. I think Noa had good physicals but AK also looks for intangibles like his cutting, off-ball movement, connective passing on plays, etc.. These are all the things that Matas had over everyone else even though his stats sucked and his measurements were not elite.


I’m 100% with you. Measurements are vastly overrated. They tell you something, and can help see potential ceilings / upsides…. but the correlation between measurements and outcomes is so awful I don’t think you would even see a much of trend line if you plotted wingspan vs defensive impact. Reach and block rate would give you some level of positive correlation - but only some - guys like Brandon Clarke lack reach but rely in timing and quickness jumps, etc.

I hope you are right that Essengue was less a measurements pick (a la Pat, Terry, possibly Phillips) and was more informed by scouting.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,219
And1: 6,323
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#615 » by Indomitable » Thu Jul 3, 2025 8:16 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I said the exact same on draft night and was crucified for it. Good but not great length.

Nobody crucified you.
:banghead:
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,632
And1: 6,889
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#616 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 8:51 pm

Indomitable wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
Senor Chang wrote:One thing people are glossing over with the giannis comps just as they did with the pwill/ kawhi comps is wingspan. Kawhi and giannis have 7’3” wingspans. These are significant in why they’re able to do a lot of what they do. While 6’11” and 7’0” wingspan is good it’s not freakish and kawhi/giannis have freakish wingspans. So let’s compare noa with guys who have wingspans on the same planet.

Also worth noting that if masai had any say in the draft this year for Toronto he decided to pass on essengue. Maybe it means he doesn’t believe his length is freakish enough to overcome some of his deficiencies.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I said the exact same on draft night and was crucified for it. Good but not great length.

Nobody crucified you.

Not literally.
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,617
And1: 24,830
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#617 » by kulaz3000 » Thu Jul 3, 2025 11:19 pm

Why so serious?
sco
RealGM
Posts: 26,875
And1: 8,972
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#618 » by sco » Fri Jul 4, 2025 12:41 am

kulaz3000 wrote:

That may be my favorite one of these yet. Loved Matas' personality shining through. Rooks seem cool. Liked Noa's family stuff too.
:clap:
rosenthall
Pro Prospect
Posts: 819
And1: 524
Joined: May 26, 2001

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#619 » by rosenthall » Fri Jul 4, 2025 12:45 am

Thoughts after watching him for a little bit:

- Agree the Giannis comps are way off since Giannis was just on a different level in terms of skill, coordination and burst. No way Noa can credibly initiate offense the way Giannis did at the same point in his career.

- Chet is a little closer since I think he ends up a 4/5 after adding weight, but to be frank Chet >>> Noa as a prospect. Chet is an elite rim protector who has a 7'6 wingspan and 9'7 standing reaching that he uses to great effect to deter shots at the rim. He was #1 in the NBA this year at FG% near the rim.....Noa just does not look like he has that sort of defensive potential on the interior, and in this regard his shorter wingspan means a lot. Chet could also score at all 3 levels and brought a more sophisticated offensive bag coming into the league than Noah has.

- I think the Shawn Marion comps are good, and capture the essence of what he is as a player, although Shawn was smaller and used a Rodman-esque jumping speed to create plays on offense and defense, and I don't think Noa has that element to his game.

- The comp that really speaks to me that I haven't seen mentioned is......Joaqim Noah. They are very close in size and I'm pretty sure Noah weighed about the same as Noa at the same age. After he adds weight I'd expect him to have very similar physical capabilities at the NBA level. Noa has better offensive potential though, but he still looks like a garbage man overall to me.

- For current players in the NBA he most closely resembles Tidjane Salaun, for better or worse.

- Another comp that I like that goes way back is Derrick McKey. He was 6'11, could defend the whole front court and played big minutes for two really good teams. He also made two all-defense teams, so was widely recognized as an impactful player. I think he's another realistic best case comp.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,876
And1: 3,578
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Chicago Bulls select Noa Essengue - #12 overall 

Post#620 » by MGB8 » Fri Jul 4, 2025 1:13 am

Giannis’s nbadraft.net draft profile:

Strenghts: Athletic wing with a remarkable 7’3” wingspan of and incredibly huge hands … He’s still in the development stage and has grown three inches since last year … Standing 6’9”, he has amazing mobility and body control for a guy his height … He’s able to change directions off the dribble and with the ball in his hands with incredible smoothness and quickness, getting to the rim while maintaining excellent balance … His athleticism and wingspan make him able to cover 4 positions on the floor, showing great versatility … He has a natural feel for the game and a good basketball IQ, with good passing skills and instincts and the potential to become a point forward at the next level … Thanks to his big hands and his creativity, he’s an amazing ball handler for his position … He’s unstoppable with momentum, especially during secondary transition, when he can exploit his amazing mobility starting from the dribble … This year during youth games and Greek second division games, he showed the ability to start from one end after the rebound and go coast to coast and get to the rim with 2-3 dribbles, with incredible smoothness and speed … He shows good potential to improve as a shooter even if it’s his main shortcoming at the moment … On the defensive end he has great instincts in the passing lanes and in help situations, often with perfect timing for blocks from the blind side … With his physical tools he could easily guard opposing wings, showing the potential to defend both guards and power forwards, depending match ups. He’s still raw in many perspectives, but his ceiling and upside are the highest among the internationals of this 2013 draft …

Weaknesses: His level of competition is a big concern, because it makes judging his talent and current level very difficult. Without question he has a large basement to go with his large ceiling … Despite his athletic abilities he lacks elite explosiveness … He has to bulk up, working especially in the lower body since he’s definitely too skinny to face NBA opponents at the moment … The concern is how to develop him correctly from the muscular standpoint, in order to avoid loss of speed and mobility (Boris Diaw) … His game off the ball is rather weak, especially related to spacing and use of screens and cuts, in fact most of his offensive production happens with the ball in his hands … The only exception is when he’s slashing to the basket for put backs or on the break … Plus he basically has no mid-range game, he tends to attack the rim without considering the option of the pull up jumper … He shot 31.3 % from three point line this year, showing good potential, but he lacks consistency at this point, his mechanics seems unnatural and not fluent … On the defensive side, he needs to learn the basis, since he’s beaten by the opponents due a lack of proper positioning and comprehension … The overall impression is of a raw prospect from basketball comprehension standpoint, whose is based on instincts, talent, physical gifts and natural feel for the game. For this reason he needs to be tested at a higher level of competition than Greek second division, since his level of experience is definitely low.


Yes, Giannis grew, and probably came in with somewhat broader shoulders, and certainly with a better handle. But Noa’s handle isn’t awful and the underlined parts show the commonalities - which are substantial.

Return to Chicago Bulls