ImageImageImage

Schroder's gone

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
VicVinegar
Sophomore
Posts: 243
And1: 221
Joined: Jul 01, 2024

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#201 » by VicVinegar » Tue Jul 8, 2025 4:15 am

Boy that's a huge trade exception. I really love the flexibility that gives this team. Yes I think there's more holes/question marks after this free agency that we all had hoped for going in. But this now let's out work out the kinks early in the season, see what the weaknesses are and who needs to get shipped out. Now they can make a trade to upgrade a player when things become more clear. Hell worst case scenario, you like your guys and just add another guy for cheap. We got paid a 2nd to take on Dennis Schroeder at $9M, and now we have $14.8M to spend.
Phobo_Phile
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,746
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Grand Rapids
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#202 » by Phobo_Phile » Tue Jul 8, 2025 4:28 am

Does anyone know if Atl waived LeVert's cap hold? They probably did but it would be really crazy to arrange a sign and trade with them into the TPE we just got and still hold onto our MLE.

Sent from my motorola one 5G ace using RealGM mobile app
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,826
And1: 3,419
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#203 » by theBigLip » Tue Jul 8, 2025 5:27 am

The TPE is a good thing. It’s as if we are getting a player (to be named later) back in this trade. I’d bet we’re using it. And for just a SRP to get a mid salary kind of guy like a Sam Hauser or such? Of course we’re hoping for a backup PF. Good job TL!
User avatar
dVs33
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 10,184
And1: 1,871
Joined: Apr 20, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Oz
   

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#204 » by dVs33 » Tue Jul 8, 2025 6:24 am

theBigLip wrote:The TPE is a good thing. It’s as if we are getting a player (to be named later) back in this trade. I’d bet we’re using it. And for just a SRP to get a mid salary kind of guy like a Sam Hauser or such? Of course we’re hoping for a backup PF. Good job TL!
It's a much better outcome than taking on monk.
I have faith in TL getting us some PF depth.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
VicVinegar
Sophomore
Posts: 243
And1: 221
Joined: Jul 01, 2024

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#205 » by VicVinegar » Tue Jul 8, 2025 7:08 am

Duren - Stew - Reed
Tobias - ???
Ausar - Robinson - Holland
Ivey - Levert
Cade - Timeshare - Sasser

+$14.8M Trade Exception + Bi-annual exception (which I assume will be saved) and all of our picks.

Honestly it's not awful if they can get a PF. There's definitely a lot of depth. Hell, Holland is going to be fighting for minutes.

I'd love a more natural backup PG, but Cade is going to play 35 minutes a game and Ivey and Levert splitting 13 minutes a game isn't the end of the world.

Really just need to find our PF, which also might be our PF of the future with Tobias coming off the books. Dumping Reed and/or Sasser at the trade deadline could free up a lot of space too. Could potentially get like a $22M guy here.
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,196
And1: 3,323
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#206 » by Billl » Tue Jul 8, 2025 11:08 am

NYPiston wrote:
Billl wrote:
The point isn’t to get something for monk. The point is to have some salary on the books to use in a trade. He wouldn’t be the “value” part. We aren’t going to be under the cap again, so we need some moveable contracts.


How does adding a bad salary make it a more tradeable asset?
The Pistons already have a couple of match level salaries to add in a trade in Harris and Stewart to a lesser extent if they wanted to go big fish hunting so I don't understand the logic of adding a bad contract and call it moveable in adding anything meaningful in which the Pistons are likely adding assets to move it if Monk gets lost in the rotation.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,252
And1: 5,239
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#207 » by Kilo » Tue Jul 8, 2025 11:33 am

TPE is basically MLE level contract know. What MLE PF's are available for trade?
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 20,326
And1: 2,638
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#208 » by thesack12 » Tue Jul 8, 2025 12:27 pm

A decent sized TPE is one of those things that you would rather have than not have. Most likely, it won't bear much substance, but you never know what opportunities might come across your desk. Having the little bit of flexibility the TPE provides, does have value. For all we know, if might lead to Detroit getting a late 1st for being the facilitator in a 3 way or something.

Regardless of the eventual outcome, the flexibility was worth the cost of a 2nd. At the very least, it probably wouldn't be all that hard for Detroit can to recoup a 2nd by using the TPE to absorb an unwanted contract from a team wanting to get out of luxury tax.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,442
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#209 » by Pharaoh » Tue Jul 8, 2025 12:38 pm

If anything it's a smarter manipulation of the cap rules than Weaver executed

Does the TPE ever eventuate in anything? Maybe, maybe not.

But it's better than the Joe Harris trade or a bunch of other scenarios we can all being up.

You can sit beside Sam Presti or David Giffin and learn something. Or you can sit beside them and learn nothing.

Hope springs eternal. New GM. New hope.

This franchise has been a disappointment for damn near 20 years.

I'll be here for any resurrection in my lifetime

Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM mobile app
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#210 » by Kalamazoo317 » Tue Jul 8, 2025 1:38 pm

Vast majority of TPEs go unused and basically just save the team money (it's a contract they don't have to pay out). Would be great if we get someone in that slot, but not holding my breath.
SuperBad
Junior
Posts: 460
And1: 204
Joined: Jan 07, 2020
         

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#211 » by SuperBad » Tue Jul 8, 2025 2:10 pm

We’ve used lime 4/17 in the last ten years or something like that, league wide usage of the TOE is like this
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,298
And1: 3,864
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#212 » by Mr Peanut » Tue Jul 8, 2025 5:00 pm

I think the fact that we traded a second suggests we do likely use it. PJ Washington's contract would fit nicely as he may be the odd man out in Dallas's crowded frontcourt.
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,703
And1: 734
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#213 » by Crymson » Tue Jul 8, 2025 5:16 pm

tmorgan wrote:I don’t think it’s hyperbole to state Weaver and his team wouldn’t have managed this.


Aye, it was an adroit feat of cap management that gave the Pistons the options of operating above or below the cap.

VicVinegar wrote:Wow, that's freaking awesome for only a 2nd! It says trade exceptions expire in one calendar year, so in theory could the Pistons use the exception on the 2026/2027 team? That much money might play a role in replacing Harris coming off the books with our next PF.


They'll have the use of it for one calendar year after the trade is completed, so it would last a day past the end of next offseason's moratorium.

Bear in mind that the TPE can't be combined with another exception or with salary. It can be used only to take in by trade one player whose salary is less than ~$14.35m or multiple players whose salaries add up to no more than that amount.

VicVinegar wrote:Awesome, I was just thinking how the Reed signing might have originally been reported as A BAE and I was thinking wouldn't it have been smarter to just sign Reed normally? Great if we have the BAE too.


Reed's Early Bird rights traveled over by the waiver pickup, then persisted after he was waived because he re-signed with the Pistons.

Pharaoh wrote:So we operated as an over the cap team, not under?Is there a situation that would have allowed us to work the system so that we still have the MLE and not the TPE?

1 - trade Fontecchio for Duncan
2 - resign Reed and Schroeder
3 - S&T Schroeder to the Kings
4 - Acquire LeVert into TPE from Atlanta

Could that have worked? Assuming obviously LeVert starting salary is = to the TPE of course


Yep, they operated above the cap.

I believe that scenario would've worked, but it appears that they opted to not pursue it.
User avatar
VicVinegar
Sophomore
Posts: 243
And1: 221
Joined: Jul 01, 2024

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#214 » by VicVinegar » Wed Jul 9, 2025 5:25 am

"Bear in mind that the TPE can't be combined with another exception or with salary. It can be used only to take in by trade one player whose salary is less than ~$14.35m or multiple players whose salaries add up to no more than that amount."

Interesting, but they can definitely get creative. For example, acquire a $14M player from one team using the exception. They can then turn that player around and Reed and Sasser's non-guaranteed contracts ($8M) and I think in theory they can get up to 125% of that return back in a trade? Which would be a $25M+ player.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 1,992
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#215 » by Canadafan » Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:50 pm

VicVinegar wrote:"Bear in mind that the TPE can't be combined with another exception or with salary. It can be used only to take in by trade one player whose salary is less than ~$14.35m or multiple players whose salaries add up to no more than that amount."

Interesting, but they can definitely get creative. For example, acquire a $14M player from one team using the exception. They can then turn that player around and Reed and Sasser's non-guaranteed contracts ($8M) and I think in theory they can get up to 125% of that return back in a trade? Which would be a $25M+ player.


Yes. This is the play. Find a team that's desperate to get off a contract. Lots of teams are over the luxury tax right now too. Use our TPE to help them out. Then at the deadline do your idea.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,927
And1: 12,454
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#216 » by BadMofoPimp » Sat Jul 12, 2025 6:50 am

Consider the TPE insurance in case someone gets injured this season and they need something to use in a trade.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 1,992
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#217 » by Canadafan » Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:57 am

Read on Twitter
?t=wjgH--x-8qzAQC1IJVQV8A&s=19

Read on Twitter
?t=wjgH--x-8qzAQC1IJVQV8A&s=19

Who's gonna need us to save them those tax dollars?
Vet minimum for a backup PF for us.
Save the BAE for next summer.
Use TPE by deadline which will hopefully get us an asset like a draft pick by saving a team cash. And be able to use that new player along with Reed and/or possibly Tobias for our new PF of the future.
Thats just my prediction though :wink:
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 1,992
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Schroder's gone 

Post#218 » by Canadafan » Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:18 pm

Some players that aren't necessarily all that helpful to us but teams might want to unload and compensate us and players where we would be the ones compensating;

Grant Williams
Brandon Clarke
Royce O'Neale

Some that might need us to sweeten the pot;

Sam Hauser
PJ Washington
Obi Toppin

There's also some centers that teams might look to get out from under their contracts as well

Return to Detroit Pistons