niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Dale and Antonio Davis
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
OakleyDokely wrote:niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Dale and Antonio Davis
bobbyp3588 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Dale and Antonio Davis
Dating yourself, old man.
Good call though.
OakleyDokely wrote:niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Dale and Antonio Davis
HumbleRen wrote:niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Draymond and Iggy? lol. Closest thing that comes to mind.
niQ wrote:HumbleRen wrote:niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Draymond and Iggy? lol. Closest thing that comes to mind.
You know what? That's actually pretty good. We also have Ingram as our KD. We just need IQ and Gradey/JaKobe to be our Curry and Klay lol
HumbleRen wrote:niQ wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Draymond and Iggy? lol. Closest thing that comes to mind.
You know what? That's actually pretty good. We also have Ingram as our KD. We just need IQ and Gradey/JaKobe to be our Curry and Klay lol
Seems simple enough
OakleyDokely wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
Dale and Antonio Davis
Dating yourself, old man.
Good call though.
90s ball was something else. Ugly but tough.
manjusaka wrote:CMB has a natural feel around the basket, already has some post up game. SB is focusing on the mid range, 3p and faced up with the ball in hand. Offensively they are quite different.
HumbleRen wrote:niQ wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Draymond and Iggy? lol. Closest thing that comes to mind.
You know what? That's actually pretty good. We also have Ingram as our KD. We just need IQ and Gradey/JaKobe to be our Curry and Klay lol
Seems simple enough
MEDIC wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:
Dating yourself, old man.
Good call though.
90s ball was something else. Ugly but tough.
It was more true to the sport. A more pure version.
JB7 wrote:MEDIC wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
90s ball was something else. Ugly but tough.
It was more true to the sport. A more pure version.
What a difference from today's game. In the 90's every possession was like a 24 second battle, players beating up on each other to try and create space for a shot.
Compared to today's game, where they sprint down the court and throw up a shot from anywhere.
JB7 wrote:MEDIC wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
90s ball was something else. Ugly but tough.
It was more true to the sport. A more pure version.
What a difference from today's game. In the 90's every possession was like a 24 second battle, players beating up on each other to try and create space for a shot.
Compared to today's game, where they sprint down the court and throw up a shot from anywhere.
niQ wrote:HumbleRen wrote:niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
Draymond and Iggy? lol. Closest thing that comes to mind.
You know what? That's actually pretty good. We also have Ingram as our KD. We just need IQ and Gradey/JaKobe to be our Curry and Klay lol
niQ wrote:What's the closest comparison to have 2 bowling balls (CMB/SB) on the team and making it work?
tsherkin wrote:JB7 wrote:MEDIC wrote:
It was more true to the sport. A more pure version.
What a difference from today's game. In the 90's every possession was like a 24 second battle, players beating up on each other to try and create space for a shot.
Compared to today's game, where they sprint down the court and throw up a shot from anywhere.
What was the 80s, then, in your mind?