jnrjr79 wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:
I guess I’d be interested what others think, but I think a “dynasty” requires a minimum of 4 championships for a particular group. No one, for instance, refers to the Bad Boy Pistons as a dynasty because they were very good for a stretch and won two.
Everybody has their own opinion. This aligns more with my definition of dynasty.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/basketball/10-greatest-nba-dynasties-of-all-timeYes, somebody is referring to that Pistons team as a dynasty and it took two seconds to find them.
Wikipedia defines sports dynasty as:
"In sports, a dynasty is a team or individual that dominates their sport or league for an extended length of time."
So call it what you want, when I say dynasty, I mean a team that's excellent and dominant for a period of years.
The Buffalo Bills went to 4 Super Bowls in a row. Were they a dynasty?
You haven’t
dominated anything if you haven’t won it.
I brought in outside definitions. You change sports. How many games are played in the regular season and playoffs in football?
17 regular season games now, was less. One game per round in the playoffs. Half the season against 4 teams in the same division.
Versus dominating for 82 games with 7 games playoff series.
The same 10 guys have to be consistently great for way more games in the NBA for a team to be dominant. Just like anything else, sample size should count in determining who's great. You can win 14-16 total games in football and have a championship. You're fighting for worst team in the league with that many wins in the NBA. Or you can dominate all year in NFL, win every game but the final one that counts. Lose to a worse team with a worse record. Guess the whole season revolves around that one game.
I guess the 73-9 Warriors weren't dominating because they didn't win the Finals. It's so arbitrary to say if you don't win the Finals, all the other playoff rounds and dominating teams the entire season just doesn't matter. Steph was sitting half the fourth quarter most games.
Not going to argue definitions. I showed you the first two I came up with. That's the extent to which I'll press my argument, argue with Wikipedia or Sportskeeda, lmao! You're not going to change my definition or what I meant when I said it.