McBubbles wrote:Kinda wish I saved the honourable mentions now. The next few posts are gonna be very repetitive lol.
Peak 2; #1, 1974 Kareem
At the time the best scorer of all time whilst also being the best defensive player in the league. Very rarely does a player have an argument to be (and not on a position relative basis) the best offensive and defensive player in the league. In the purest sense of the term is likely the best two-way player in NBA history at his peak. Very resilient in the playoffs at his best also whilst facing excellent competition and whilst carrying a huge load.
Peak 2; #2, 2004 Kevin Garnett
In my opinion the 2nd most talented player in NBA history at his peak after Lebron. Could do everything at an elite level. Was so good offensively that if he was neutral on defence he’d still deserve an MVP, + he was a DPOY caliber player. Nowhere near as good as Kareem as a scorer but infinitely better ball handler and passer whilst being comparable and likely slightly better on defence (remember this is 04 not 08-13 KG defence i’m talking about so don’t get yer panties in a twist). Insane impact, insane carry job in the 04 season also. Not as high as a win total as other seasons but big boi impact stats.
Reason he's below Kareem is because I don't think he elevated his game as much as Kareem did. KG was just as good in the post season as the regular season, but Kareem upped his game imo.
Peak 2; #3, 1991 Michael Jordan
Also proto-Lebronesque in that MJ was the first perimeter player (to my knowledge anyway) to be in the GOAT conversation on offence whilst being DPOY level (though only relative to his position) on defence. GOAT level scorer, rises in post season, very resilient.
Lower than Kareem and KG because they seem infinitely more portable and less dependant on a system to maximise their talents than MJ. I think Kareem and KG are just as good at elevating their team in multiple different hypotheticals and team settings. I'm not confident that the "why the **** would I pass to teammates lol" hyper-antisocial would be however. I guess you could say that'd only be relevant for a career discussion not a peak but this is my comment so suck ya mudda![]()
That and I think you kinda have to be a big man or at least capable of doing big man ish to be in the GOAT conversation anyway tbh.
The center of gravity and shorter stature of guards allows them to be much better ball handlers and on ball playmakers yes, + the 3 point shot decreases the physicality induced efficiency gap in bigs and smalls BUT bigs can still get very close to doing everything guards can do offensively whilst the opposite isn't even close to being true.
Come on. If KG is ahead of Jordan's, Duncan surely is too.