ReddoverKobe wrote:Hair Jordan wrote:ReddoverKobe wrote:
96 shaq was not 01 shaq.
96 shaq put up 27 and 11 though.
Meanwhile D. Scott and Anderson shot 6 for 34 on threes and the team shot 24%.
Stop with your nonsense. ‘96 Shaq averaged two fewer points and just as many rebounds as ‘01 Shaq. In fact, 2 of his 3 best scoring average years came in his 2nd and 3rd seasons. 2001 was his 9th season. Just because he won his first title in 2001 doesn’t mean it was the best version of Shaq - it was just the best team he was on up to that point.
reality is nonsense, got it. The jordan cult is so strange.
I don't get the point of dragging down a discussion with disenguity. 2001 Shaq was the better, wiser Shaq. But 96 Shaq wasn't far behind, was still an MVP-caliber player, a year removed from a finals run, and was at his athletic peak. I always roll my eyes when posters bring up the argument that the Bulls didn't go through elite centers. In the entire history of the NBA, there isn't exactly a giant list of centers better than Shaq on the Magic. He was downright terrifying and dominant. Ewing is a top 50 player, and frankly, Alonzo Mourning gets overlooked too.