ImageImage

Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,510
And1: 29,333
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#161 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Jul 25, 2025 3:17 pm

And I'll also posit, it's not like Barrett hasn't actually been productive out there. Even the advanced numbers aren't bad anymore (79th percentile offensive EPM, 158th out of 523 in total EPM). He really upped his catch and shoot volume (36.4% on 4.7 attempts per game), and has been a 40% guy from the corners each of the last 2-years. There's a bunch of underrated improvement there when you dig deeper into the numbers.
User avatar
tedbrogen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,187
And1: 3,725
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#162 » by tedbrogen » Fri Jul 25, 2025 3:43 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:And I'll also posit, it's not like Barrett hasn't actually been productive out there. Even the advanced numbers aren't bad anymore (79th percentile offensive EPM, 158th out of 523 in total EPM). He really upped his catch and shoot volume (36.4% on 4.7 attempts per game), and has been a 40% guy from the corners each of the last 2-years. There's a bunch of underrated improvement there when you dig deeper into the numbers.


What’s league average on catch and shoot threes? What’s league average on corner threes?
pifhluk23
Starter
Posts: 2,451
And1: 1,464
Joined: Dec 24, 2008

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#163 » by pifhluk23 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 3:45 pm

Although I'd still trade for him, another issue with RJ is last 4 seasons games played:

58
32
26
58

I don't think he's worth even a protected 1st swap.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,510
And1: 29,333
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#164 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Jul 25, 2025 3:48 pm

tedbrogen wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:And I'll also posit, it's not like Barrett hasn't actually been productive out there. Even the advanced numbers aren't bad anymore (79th percentile offensive EPM, 158th out of 523 in total EPM). He really upped his catch and shoot volume (36.4% on 4.7 attempts per game), and has been a 40% guy from the corners each of the last 2-years. There's a bunch of underrated improvement there when you dig deeper into the numbers.


What’s league average on catch and shoot threes? What’s league average on corner threes?


37% and 38%
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,045
And1: 7,485
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#165 » by Badgerlander » Fri Jul 25, 2025 3:51 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Derrick White also looked like nothing more than a JAG rotation guy and poor 3PT shooter at Barrett's age. I'm certainly not the biggest fan of either Barrett or Kuminga, but the reason we're talking about both and why these guys would be attractive options is because of their age and talent/pedigree. Do we wanna find the next Lauri Markkanen, Joe Johnson, or even just the next Bobby? Ok, then these are the dudes you probably need to take a chance on.


Derrick White was still on his rookie deal at age 25 (Barretts age) making less than $2mil and he played good defense and hustled and made smart plays. Trading for him is low risk, at worst you get Pat C and you have restricted rights for his next contract.
The way you win trades is finding guys that will outperform their contract. The best way to do that is trade for guys on their rookie deals. Barrett has already been paid and paid on the level of if he is your second best guy then he is slightly underpaid and you win but if he turns out to be the number three guy he is slightly overpaid and you live with it. He needs the ball in his hands and has had an opportunity with two teams and has shown he is not a #2 or a #3. He isn’t a good defender or a hustle guy that makes smart plays and he isn’t a shooter so if you take the ball out of his hands and try and make him a role player he will likely struggle. He is 25, most players make developmental leaps until they reach 25 and then fine tune those skills towards their peak at age 27-28.
Kuminga is at the age where Lauri was signed on a value contract but Kuminga wants a Barrett level deal. Lauri was an elite shooter, Kuminga’s skill is drawing fouls. Not a hustle guy that makes smart plays or a defender. He is a bad fit with Giannis. Joe Johnson had shown his skills with the ball in his hands but like Khris was he a #2 guy or a number #3 guy. Bobby we grabbed off the scrap heap, there was no rusk there.
The best way to dump Kuz is to split his deal into two guys or an expiring guy. If you trade him for a higher salary guy then you are hoping a disgruntled star wants off a team and wants to force his way to milwaukee lulz, thats not happening.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,045
And1: 7,485
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#166 » by Badgerlander » Fri Jul 25, 2025 3:55 pm

Image
Image
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,510
And1: 29,333
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#167 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:06 pm

I don't obsess about contracts as much as a lot of you guys, and I guess I don't even see why RJ's 2-years, $56 million remaining hamstrings us going forward anyways? The way you win trades is finding any young players who you think can outperform their current level of play in a different environment and/or have some sort of development leap/skill refinement left in the cupboard. Also worth noting that White had already inked a 4-year, $70 million extension and Boston ponied up real assets for him (Josh Richardson, a 2022 1st, and an unprotected 2028 pick swap). That was far from a "low risk move" for Boston, but they get credit for having the foresight to see him becoming much better.
User avatar
tedbrogen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,187
And1: 3,725
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#168 » by tedbrogen » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:07 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:
tedbrogen wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:And I'll also posit, it's not like Barrett hasn't actually been productive out there. Even the advanced numbers aren't bad anymore (79th percentile offensive EPM, 158th out of 523 in total EPM). He really upped his catch and shoot volume (36.4% on 4.7 attempts per game), and has been a 40% guy from the corners each of the last 2-years. There's a bunch of underrated improvement there when you dig deeper into the numbers.


What’s league average on catch and shoot threes? What’s league average on corner threes?


37% and 38%


So he’s below league average on threes overall and catch and shoot threes, a bad free throw shooter, but is above league average on corner threes. So if you play him with GA you have to park him in the corner and take away corner threes from truly elite shooters (AJG and GTJ). And you get to pay him $30M per year. Sounds less than ideal and downright idiotic if you have to include any draft capital.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#169 » by WiscoKing13 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:10 pm

Hollinger on Smith

Tyler Smith, Bucks: The 33rd pick in the 2024 draft was perhaps the most disappointing second-year player in Vegas, failing to record a single assist in five games, shooting 31.3 percent from the floor and recording a meager 7.0 PER in five games. Already looking at another year buried at the end of the Bucks’ bench, he watched as summer teammate Chris Livingston may have passed him on the depth chart.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
tedbrogen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,187
And1: 3,725
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#170 » by tedbrogen » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:11 pm

Badgerlander wrote:Image
Image


Since my stance is to simply feed the SF minutes to AJG and GTJ, could you post this same for them?
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,517
And1: 29,513
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#171 » by paulpressey25 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:15 pm

pifhluk23 wrote:Although I'd still trade for him, another issue with RJ is last 4 seasons games played:

58
32
26
58

I don't think he's worth even a protected 1st swap.


This was a real eye opener.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#172 » by WiscoKing13 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:16 pm

I still maintain that walking into the 2024 draft we knew that the odds were that was Brooks last season with the Bucks. We had one last chance to try and draft some kind of legit prospect to try and protect ourselves(granted only top of the second rounder)

The fact that Filipkowski was taken a pick before Smith and we passed on Oso and Bona for a kid that plays the same position as Giannis and Bobby(who was likely to be back) is crazy.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,786
And1: 41,119
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#173 » by emunney » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:18 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
pifhluk23 wrote:Although I'd still trade for him, another issue with RJ is last 4 seasons games played:

58
32
26
58

I don't think he's worth even a protected 1st swap.


This was a real eye opener.


It's also very much not true.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,517
And1: 29,513
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#174 » by paulpressey25 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:21 pm

emunney wrote:
It's also very much not true.


Ah, I see what he did. So 58, 58, and 58 games.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
German Athens
Veteran
Posts: 2,748
And1: 2,296
Joined: Apr 10, 2015
 

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#175 » by German Athens » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:22 pm

emunney wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:
pifhluk23 wrote:Although I'd still trade for him, another issue with RJ is last 4 seasons games played:

58
32
26
58

I don't think he's worth even a protected 1st swap.


This was a real eye opener.


It's also very much not true.


70
73
58
58
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,786
And1: 41,119
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#176 » by emunney » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:22 pm

To clarify, that 1st 58 is 23-24, and the 32 and 26 are the splits with the Knicks and Raptors. Lots of tanky DNPs in March on both of those years. 143 games in the previous two seasons.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
PG Graveyard
General Manager
Posts: 8,844
And1: 5,700
Joined: Nov 26, 2015
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#177 » by PG Graveyard » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:23 pm

emunney wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:
pifhluk23 wrote:Although I'd still trade for him, another issue with RJ is last 4 seasons games played:

58
32
26
58

I don't think he's worth even a protected 1st swap.


This was a real eye opener.


It's also very much not true.


Yeah he’s been 58, 58, 73, 70, 72, 56.

I’m also guessing the last two years he was sat out some games for some tanking activity by the Raptors
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,045
And1: 7,485
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#178 » by Badgerlander » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:24 pm

tedbrogen wrote:
Badgerlander wrote:Image
Image


Since my stance is to simply feed the SF minutes to AJG and GTJ, could you post this same for them?


Image
Image
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,510
And1: 29,333
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#179 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:25 pm

tedbrogen wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:
tedbrogen wrote:
What’s league average on catch and shoot threes? What’s league average on corner threes?


37% and 38%


So he’s below league average on threes overall and catch and shoot threes, a bad free throw shooter, but is above league average on corner threes. So if you play him with GA you have to park him in the corner and take away corner threes from truly elite shooters (AJG and GTJ). And you get to pay him $30M per year. Sounds less than ideal and downright idiotic if you have to include any draft capital.


If we just ignore all the nuance that was just laid out, then sure. He's a legit wing-sized ball-handler that averaged 21/6/5 on a bad team, but the shooting splits were meant to show that he's improved and has some utility as an off-ball guy (only 25-30 players got up more catch and shoot 3's per game than him). And I haven't seen a single person say they'd include draft capital for him, so I don't know why we have to keep tossing that strawman in there.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,786
And1: 41,119
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas 

Post#180 » by emunney » Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:26 pm

PG Graveyard wrote:
emunney wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:
This was a real eye opener.


It's also very much not true.


Yeah he’s been 58, 58, 73, 70, 72, 56.

I’m also guessing the last two years he was sat out some games for some tanking activity by the Raptors


It's definitely more than bad luck that nobody on the Raptors played more than 65 games last year.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts

Return to Milwaukee Bucks