Jcool0 wrote:He did consider Orlando to play with Grant Hill and TMac, but he wasn't dumb enough to leave a good thing in SA. He was never in play for Chicago.
That is also probably true, but we'll never know.
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Jcool0 wrote:He did consider Orlando to play with Grant Hill and TMac, but he wasn't dumb enough to leave a good thing in SA. He was never in play for Chicago.
Jcool0 wrote:dougthonus wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
Which worked out very well...
To be a bit fair to Krause, they changed the CBA to put in the max contract after he had this plan and to give current teams an extra year + bigger raises. If htey hadn't, he was just going to outbid SA on Tim Duncan.
He did consider Orlando to play with Grant Hill and TMac, but he wasn't dumb enough to leave a good thing in SA. He was never in play for Chicago.
Michael Jackson wrote:Indomitable wrote:League Circles wrote:Nobody said it did. The claim was that it was exciting with very big swings. Krause's strategy was also hurt IIRC by the introduction of the individual player max. Without that we very well may have had a second dynasty. I'm not a Krause fan btw, just saying.
I was the one who use to say that. It destroyed the Tmac strategy.
Yeah he was surely looking to overpay for the guys
DropStep wrote:Michael Jackson wrote:Indomitable wrote:I was the one who use to say that. It destroyed the Tmac strategy.
Yeah he was surely looking to overpay for the guys
The phrase "full boat" still makes me shudder.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
HomoSapien wrote:?s=46&t=xOB22xGd85UcfRRu6zUm4w
So we probably definitely turned it down.
HomoSapien wrote:?s=46&t=xOB22xGd85UcfRRu6zUm4w
So we probably definitely turned it down.
Dan Z wrote:HomoSapien wrote:?s=46&t=xOB22xGd85UcfRRu6zUm4w
So we probably definitely turned it down.
The Suns should've taken that deal (Bulls too), but I'm also not a big Maluach fan.
Jcool0 wrote:Dan Z wrote:HomoSapien wrote:?s=46&t=xOB22xGd85UcfRRu6zUm4w
So we probably definitely turned it down.
The Suns should've taken that deal (Bulls too), but I'm also not a big Maluach fan.
As a big fan of his, i would of taken the deal. And i think picks in the 20s are pretty useless.
HomoSapien wrote:?s=46&t=xOB22xGd85UcfRRu6zUm4w
So we probably definitely turned it down.
Could the Suns have done what Atlanta did and walked away from the draft with an unprotected future first from the Pelicans and the 23rd pick instead of staying at No. 10? Discussion over whether Phoenix fumbled the bag by not taking the New Orleans offer will only heighten if Maluach can’t give the Suns a quality big.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
pipfan wrote:This one kills me-especially since Atl get Newell (my choice) at #23.
I'm happy with Noa, but I think this non-deal will haunt us. Good chance both NO and Milw are in the lotto
Dez wrote:pipfan wrote:This one kills me-especially since Atl get Newell (my choice) at #23.
I'm happy with Noa, but I think this non-deal will haunt us. Good chance both NO and Milw are in the lotto
The Bucks are in the playoffs with Giannis alone in the weak east and add in an excellent fit in Turner they are going be a higher seed.
Unless Giannis goes down there's zero chance of the Bucks being in the lottery.