ImageImageImage

Trajan Langdon

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 9,693
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#21 » by tmorgan » Yesterday 11:19 pm

the_l_train wrote:I’d argue Caris is the THJ replacement if anything. Can’t believe how many people him are thinking of him as a backup PG…he is a ball stopper.


I mean, he’s averaged north of 5 assists a game in two different seasons, often coming off the bench, so I don’t think that’s very fair.
Fennis Dembo
Senior
Posts: 552
And1: 295
Joined: Oct 25, 2022

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#22 » by Fennis Dembo » Today 1:34 am

Nothing to add that hasn't already been said. Maybe that Chinese guy was right.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,524
And1: 1,971
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#23 » by chrbal » Today 2:34 am

the_l_train wrote:I’d argue Caris is the THJ replacement if anything. Can’t believe how many people him are thinking of him as a backup PG…he is a ball stopper.


Not really. As a secondary ball handler Caris has 4 assists per game over 500 games played. Tim has like 2 assists per game.

It’s not a huge difference, but I think it’s significant enough. I feel like they’re going to try and get more out of Sasser or move on this season from him for an upgrade. On a related note, I’m not sure how serious the Cam Thomas rumors are
User avatar
Rip32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,507
And1: 297
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#24 » by Rip32 » Today 11:56 am

I'll be ecstatic if TL can pull off a Cam Thomas trade without giving up core assets. Cam can get you a bucket and he's proven. I love Cam's work ethic and his makeup. He's a smart player. Some nba players are dumb. He'll fit right in with the team. In the event some team offers Ivey some crazy $$$ you can let him go and slide Thomas right in his spot.

Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
Invictus88
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,918
And1: 2,204
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#25 » by Invictus88 » Today 4:21 pm

Rip32 wrote:I'll be ecstatic if TL can pull off a Cam Thomas trade without giving up core assets. Cam can get you a bucket and he's proven. I love Cam's work ethic and his makeup. He's a smart player. Some nba players are dumb. He'll fit right in with the team. In the event some team offers Ivey some crazy $$$ you can let him go and slide Thomas right in his spot.



- He's a wholly inefficient scorer in terms of shooting (<.500 efg for his career)
- Despite a 33% usage (i.e running an offense) which is crazy he had only 3.8 assists. So he's a black hole.
- He's terrible on the defensive side of the ball
- He believes he should be paid a big contract which is the reason why even the lowly Nets are not biting.
- He's on the lower end height-wise (6'3")so if he's not a great 1 then he's an undersized 2.

Are you really missing Josh Smith and Ben Gordon that much that you want to acquire what is basically a hybrid of those 2?

Joe, don't you have enough on your hands screwing up the Pelicans franchise to be posting on RealGM boards?
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 9,693
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#26 » by tmorgan » Today 4:45 pm

The words “chucker” and “black hole” and “ball stopper” get thrown around a lot in these forums, often incorrectly.

Cam Thomas is a chucking black hole ball stopper. Why anyone wants this guy in Detroit is completely beyond my comprehension.

Imagine you gave Marcus Sasser an inch or two of height, took away some athleticism, took away any defensive focus at all, and gave him Beasley’s irrational confidence and ability to make tough shots and an extreme green light on a bad team. That’s Thomas. He’s a volume scorer but not an efficient one.

He’s not going to help us win. He’s not an attractive trade piece unless his salary is very low, low enough that Brooklyn would just keep him. There’s just nothing appealing here.
User avatar
A_dub06
Starter
Posts: 2,068
And1: 966
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#27 » by A_dub06 » Today 6:22 pm

Invictus88 wrote:
Rip32 wrote:I'll be ecstatic if TL can pull off a Cam Thomas trade without giving up core assets. Cam can get you a bucket and he's proven. I love Cam's work ethic and his makeup. He's a smart player. Some nba players are dumb. He'll fit right in with the team. In the event some team offers Ivey some crazy $$$ you can let him go and slide Thomas right in his spot.



- He's a wholly inefficient scorer in terms of shooting (<.500 efg for his career)
- Despite a 33% usage (i.e running an offense) which is crazy he had only 3.8 assists. So he's a black hole.
- He's terrible on the defensive side of the ball
- He believes he should be paid a big contract which is the reason why even the lowly Nets are not biting.
- He's on the lower end height-wise (6'3")so if he's not a great 1 then he's an undersized 2.

Are you really missing Josh Smith and Ben Gordon that much that you want to acquire what is basically a hybrid of those 2?

Joe, don't you have enough on your hands screwing up the Pelicans franchise to be posting on RealGM boards?


My support of a Thomas S&T to the Pistons is this, he’s never really played in an actual cohesive system with any form of identity or culture. Who was he supposed to be passing to for him to get assists? The Nets sucked and needed him to try and score every possession. In a theoretical trade to us his shot attempts and usage would need to come down, but under Bickerstaff and playing on our team I fully believe he would buy in and try defensively, which he has more than enough athleticism to be able to be at least decent. Playing in a system as opposed to hero ball would make his efficiency increase a fair deal, we currently have enough spacing, gravity in the form of cade and a good/willing passer in cade which could set him up for many open looks.

He’s got an ego for sure, but he’s clearly got all the tools to take his game to another level and I think we have the keys to make that happen. I could be wrong but pretty sure a S&T deal requires a minimum of 3 years which would give us bird rights, and in that scenario the worst that happens is that he stays just a 6th man microwave scorer (hopefully with better %’s) which we use for depth and when the 3 years are up we either trade or just don’t resign, and on the flip side if he does improve like I believe he would we resign. He has far more talent than BG ever did imo
Invictus88
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,918
And1: 2,204
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#28 » by Invictus88 » Today 6:33 pm

A_dub06 wrote:
Invictus88 wrote:
Rip32 wrote:I'll be ecstatic if TL can pull off a Cam Thomas trade without giving up core assets. Cam can get you a bucket and he's proven. I love Cam's work ethic and his makeup. He's a smart player. Some nba players are dumb. He'll fit right in with the team. In the event some team offers Ivey some crazy $$$ you can let him go and slide Thomas right in his spot.



- He's a wholly inefficient scorer in terms of shooting (<.500 efg for his career)
- Despite a 33% usage (i.e running an offense) which is crazy he had only 3.8 assists. So he's a black hole.
- He's terrible on the defensive side of the ball
- He believes he should be paid a big contract which is the reason why even the lowly Nets are not biting.
- He's on the lower end height-wise (6'3")so if he's not a great 1 then he's an undersized 2.

Are you really missing Josh Smith and Ben Gordon that much that you want to acquire what is basically a hybrid of those 2?

Joe, don't you have enough on your hands screwing up the Pelicans franchise to be posting on RealGM boards?


My support of a Thomas S&T to the Pistons is this, he’s never really played in an actual cohesive system with any form of identity or culture. Who was he supposed to be passing to for him to get assists? The Nets sucked and needed him to try and score every possession. In a theoretical trade to us his shot attempts and usage would need to come down, but under Bickerstaff and playing on our team I fully believe he would buy in and try defensively, which he has more than enough athleticism to be able to be at least decent. Playing in a system as opposed to hero ball would make his efficiency increase a fair deal, we currently have enough spacing, gravity in the form of cade and a good/willing passer in cade which could set him up for many open looks.

He’s got an ego for sure, but he’s clearly got all the tools to take his game to another level and I think we have the keys to make that happen. I could be wrong but pretty sure a S&T deal requires a minimum of 3 years which would give us bird rights, and in that scenario the worst that happens is that he stays just a 6th man microwave scorer (hopefully with better %’s) which we use for depth and when the 3 years are up we either trade or just don’t resign, and on the flip side if he does improve like I believe he would we resign. He has far more talent than BG ever did imo


The reason I don't believe any of the above comes from comments that Thomas has made himself regarding being labelled as a ball hog.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/cam-thomas-jabs-nets-gm-lashes-out-at-consensus-ball-hog-opinion-in-social-media-barrage/

"This is most likely the same consensus teams who can't guard me and send double teams from jump ball. Why are we double teaming a guy who's 'not that good' make it make sense please," Thomas wrote on "X".


The answer to this question is that teams have found that to be a reliable and winning strategy because you end up taking low percentage attempts instead of properly passing the ball away (further evidenced by the high usage).

The guys is simply not aware of things like this. We've seen this type of thing from guys before on some of our most awful teams. There is literally no reason to add that type of mentality to the group we have; where basically everyone is willing to share the ball to get the best shot.

There is no way that he wants to settle for being a 6th man either. He believes that he should be an alpha and be paid as one (30 million annually?). We simply do not need nor should want that on a team where we have been successful with the hierarchy that we have.
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,703
And1: 734
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#29 » by Crymson » Today 6:44 pm

Not to play killjoy, but this is all sort of a moot point given that Thomas has no reason whatsoever to join the Pistons on an MLE-level salary and was never linked to the Pistons in any manner beyond arbitrary betting odds from an unregulated offshore sportsbook.

The genesis of all this wasn't even so much as an obscure rumor from one of the typical unreliable sources. It was just silly math from Bovada.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 9,693
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#30 » by tmorgan » Today 7:35 pm

There is no “bad team” excuse for Cam, either. You can excuse a bad OnCourt +/- (which he definitely has) because of being on a bad team, but his On/Off has also been terrible until last year, when he finally posted a +0.4 in 25 games before getting hurt.

His career OnCourt per 100 possessions is -5.4. His career On/Off is -5.9. For those of you that aren’t stats-inclined, that means, for the either mostly dysfunctional or just plain bad Nets, for the last four years, they’ve been -5.4 points per 100 possessions with him ON the court, and +0.5 points per 100 possessions with him OFF the court (when he’s active).

That’s a large sample. Cam Thomas basketball, aka CamBall is losing basketball. You think you can bring him here with his obliviousness and big ego and change him? You want to take that bet? I do not. He sucks.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 9,693
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#31 » by tmorgan » Today 7:41 pm

To bastardize a quote from Field of Dreams:

“if you double them, they won’t pass”

A nice little note for Cam Thomas, Benedict Mathurin, Cam Whitmore, Jonathan Kuminga, and certainly some others as well.
User avatar
Rip32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,507
And1: 297
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#32 » by Rip32 » Today 7:42 pm

tmorgan wrote:The words “chucker” and “black hole” and “ball stopper” get thrown around a lot in these forums, often incorrectly.

Cam Thomas is a chucking black hole ball stopper. Why anyone wants this guy in Detroit is completely beyond my comprehension.

Imagine you gave Marcus Sasser an inch or two of height, took away some athleticism, took away any defensive focus at all, and gave him Beasley’s irrational confidence and ability to make tough shots and an extreme green light on a bad team. That’s Thomas. He’s a volume scorer but not an efficient one.

He’s not going to help us win. He’s not an attractive trade piece unless his salary is very low, low enough that Brooklyn would just keep him. There’s just nothing appealing here.

Hell if Ivey switched roles with Thomas in Brooklyn you probably use the same adjectives. Brooklyn is a lousy team. The fact that TL is looking into and most are predicting us the be the landing spot is good news. Cade and Ivey (but who knows if he'll be the same player before injury) are the only true bucket go getters on the team.
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 9,693
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#33 » by tmorgan » Today 7:54 pm

Rip32 wrote:
tmorgan wrote:The words “chucker” and “black hole” and “ball stopper” get thrown around a lot in these forums, often incorrectly.

Cam Thomas is a chucking black hole ball stopper. Why anyone wants this guy in Detroit is completely beyond my comprehension.

Imagine you gave Marcus Sasser an inch or two of height, took away some athleticism, took away any defensive focus at all, and gave him Beasley’s irrational confidence and ability to make tough shots and an extreme green light on a bad team. That’s Thomas. He’s a volume scorer but not an efficient one.

He’s not going to help us win. He’s not an attractive trade piece unless his salary is very low, low enough that Brooklyn would just keep him. There’s just nothing appealing here.

Hell if Ivey switched roles with Thomas in Brooklyn you probably use the same adjectives. Brooklyn is a lousy team. The fact that TL is looking into and most are predicting us the be the landing spot is good news. Cade and Ivey (but who knows if he'll be the same player before injury) are the only true bucket go getters on the team.


No. Absolutely not. And you know I’m not a big Ivey fan.

Ivey had to run a lot of point as a rookie because Cade missed the year. Despite zero pro experience and many holes in his game, playing for a sketchy X’s and O’s coach and a very weak roster, he managed 5.2 assists per game on his 25.4% usage. In his two seasons since, playing mostly SG, he’s still averaged more assists despite significantly less usage than Cam.

Cam’s very best year as a passer was last year — he’s made progress from the worst tunnel vision in the league to only “one of the worst”. And in that short sample of 25 games, he averaged 3.8 assists despite 32.6% usage. In his previous season, 2.9 assists on 30.5% usage. Dude just doesn’t pass, and as he himself says, he gets doubled all the time.

He plays losing basketball.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,817
And1: 17,960
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Trajan Langdon 

Post#34 » by Snakebites » 47 minutes ago

There is no credible sourcing that suggests we're considering adding Cam Thomas.

All we have is betting activity from one site, and even that isn't giving us particularly strong odds. It's the sort of odds on things you see when nobody really knows what is going on.

We will not be adding Cam Thomas.

As for what I think of him- he's a decent scorer. He's not particularly inefficient as a scorer either, a feat on that team. But he's also not much of a passer, isn't effective off ball, and doesn't play defense.

He's a bad fit here and a bad fit on most rosters. He's a good isolation scorer but not good enough to carry a good offense. And players like that just aren't going for much in today's league.

Again- he's the type of guy I hope Ivey doesn't become.

Return to Detroit Pistons