ImageImageImageImageImage

Trades and Transactions 2025 V

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,229
And1: 26,862
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#161 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Aug 3, 2025 3:43 am

cgmw wrote:No Ben Simmons chatter on the board?

Simmons
Yabu
Hart
Clarkson
Deuce

I get it from the standpoint that he’d fit with the second unit as PG on offense and C on defense, but he is just such an extreme loser personality that I don’t see the risk-reward worth it even at the vet minimum. We have good chemistry and I’d rather see Huk/Shamet brought back. Talented as he is/was, Ben’s personality really is that bad. Why risk it?

Thoughts?


Plenty of chatter actually. We've been discussing him for weeks.

The idea of him is great. The reality never lives up to the the dream.

Brogdon always injured.

Shamet isn't a PG. If we bring him back, Clarkson or Deuce get the job.

Who the is there?
:beer: RIP mags
JayTWill
Starter
Posts: 2,317
And1: 1,550
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#162 » by JayTWill » Sun Aug 3, 2025 4:28 am

cgmw wrote:No Ben Simmons chatter on the board?

Simmons
Yabu
Hart
Clarkson
Deuce

I get it from the standpoint that he’d fit with the second unit as PG on offense and C on defense, but he is just such an extreme loser personality that I don’t see the risk-reward worth it even at the vet minimum. We have good chemistry and I’d rather see Huk/Shamet brought back. Talented as he is/was, Ben’s personality really is that bad. Why risk it?

Thoughts?


I understand the concerns about Simmons and his limitations as a basketball player but can some explain to me what it is about his personality that makes some people concerned that he would be the one to destroy the chemistry of the team? Many of the criticisms I hear about him apply to other players on the team especially someone like Mitch but no one has ever said Mitch would destroy the team.

And the team has a ton of talent and they seem like very likeable guys but they didn't play with a ton of chemistry on the court. Offensively it was a lot of standing around hoping Brunson could carry them and defensively the team looked lost and lackadaisical far too often. The way people talk about this team sometimes you would think everyone was 100% dedicated to the game of basketball and they were playing like the Pacers on offense and the Thunder on defense.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,496
And1: 5,671
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#163 » by spree2kawhi » Sun Aug 3, 2025 6:45 am

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
cgmw wrote:No Ben Simmons chatter on the board?

Simmons
Yabu
Hart
Clarkson
Deuce

I get it from the standpoint that he’d fit with the second unit as PG on offense and C on defense, but he is just such an extreme loser personality that I don’t see the risk-reward worth it even at the vet minimum. We have good chemistry and I’d rather see Huk/Shamet brought back. Talented as he is/was, Ben’s personality really is that bad. Why risk it?

Thoughts?


Plenty of chatter actually. We've been discussing him for weeks.

The idea of him is great. The reality never lives up to the the dream.

Brogdon always injured.

Shamet isn't a PG. If we bring him back, Clarkson or Deuce get the job.

Who the is there?

Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 24,936
And1: 22,520
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#164 » by RHODEY » Sun Aug 3, 2025 7:42 am

User avatar
Thepaintismine
Sophomore
Posts: 188
And1: 100
Joined: Apr 17, 2020
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#165 » by Thepaintismine » Sun Aug 3, 2025 10:38 am

RHODEY wrote:


I guess we can offer 3 or 4 picks going way out into the future but the Bucks short term would be ugly.
The bucks owe just about all their picks going forward, so I if they take on Bridges, etc. does it even keep them out of the lottery?
Unless Giannes demands New York, I can't see him coming here as other teams could give soooo much more.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 80,990
And1: 94,432
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#166 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Aug 3, 2025 12:22 pm

Thepaintismine wrote:
RHODEY wrote:


I guess we can offer 3 or 4 picks going way out into the future but the Bucks short term would be ugly.
The bucks owe just about all their picks going forward, so I if they take on Bridges, etc. does it even keep them out of the lottery?
Unless Giannes demands New York, I can't see him coming here as other teams could give soooo much more.


Could he fit in OKC? They could offer a metric f*ck ton of picks and probably a couple of nice young players. Salary matching would be difficult but I'd guess right off the bat iShart and Caruso are in the deal.

That's already two useful role players the Bucks could keep or flip. They'd have to come up with another 20 million.

Assume the core is Shai/Williams/Chet, and they are willing to deal anything else, within reason.
Image
VirginiaKnickFan
RealGM
Posts: 12,569
And1: 3,503
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: Virginia

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#167 » by VirginiaKnickFan » Sun Aug 3, 2025 1:02 pm

RHODEY wrote:


"NBA Every Day" YouTube channel with an amazing 59 subscribers! :lol: :lol: :lol:
B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,530
And1: 6,372
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#168 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Sun Aug 3, 2025 1:14 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Thepaintismine wrote:
RHODEY wrote:


I guess we can offer 3 or 4 picks going way out into the future but the Bucks short term would be ugly.
The bucks owe just about all their picks going forward, so I if they take on Bridges, etc. does it even keep them out of the lottery?
Unless Giannes demands New York, I can't see him coming here as other teams could give soooo much more.


Could he fit in OKC? They could offer a metric f*ck ton of picks and probably a couple of nice young players. Salary matching would be difficult but I'd guess right off the bat iShart and Caruso are in the deal.

That's already two useful role players the Bucks could keep or flip. They'd have to come up with another 20 million.

Assume the core is Shai/Williams/Chet, and they are willing to deal anything else, within reason.

Didn't quite understand the 20 million reference. According to the spotrac trade machine, Giannis for Hartenstein and Caruso straight up works salary wise (or for that matter, eg, Dort, Caruso and Wiggins).
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,229
And1: 26,862
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#169 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Aug 3, 2025 2:07 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
cgmw wrote:No Ben Simmons chatter on the board?

Simmons
Yabu
Hart
Clarkson
Deuce

I get it from the standpoint that he’d fit with the second unit as PG on offense and C on defense, but he is just such an extreme loser personality that I don’t see the risk-reward worth it even at the vet minimum. We have good chemistry and I’d rather see Huk/Shamet brought back. Talented as he is/was, Ben’s personality really is that bad. Why risk it?

Thoughts?


Plenty of chatter actually. We've been discussing him for weeks.

The idea of him is great. The reality never lives up to the the dream.

Brogdon always injured.

Shamet isn't a PG. If we bring him back, Clarkson or Deuce get the job.

Who the is there?

Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet


Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league? :o Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.

Shamet for the win?
:beer: RIP mags
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,352
And1: 6,302
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#170 » by 8516knicks » Sun Aug 3, 2025 3:16 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Plenty of chatter actually. We've been discussing him for weeks.

The idea of him is great. The reality never lives up to the the dream.

Brogdon always injured.

Shamet isn't a PG. If we bring him back, Clarkson or Deuce get the job.

Who the is there?

Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet


Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league? :o Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.

Shamet for the win?


Will Brown (unlike Thibs) look for some scoring punch from the 5? If so, maybe we find a young Kornet type? The Huk won't do for that. Having a 5 who can shoot (and play some D) would be nice. Not an all star, just someone decent at both for the 2nd unit for 10-15 min on occasion. Is Lyles still available?
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 24,936
And1: 22,520
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#171 » by RHODEY » Sun Aug 3, 2025 4:10 pm

VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
RHODEY wrote:


"NBA Every Day" YouTube channel with an amazing 59 subscribers! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Right because clout = quality :nod:
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 80,990
And1: 94,432
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#172 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Aug 3, 2025 4:19 pm

B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Thepaintismine wrote:
I guess we can offer 3 or 4 picks going way out into the future but the Bucks short term would be ugly.
The bucks owe just about all their picks going forward, so I if they take on Bridges, etc. does it even keep them out of the lottery?
Unless Giannes demands New York, I can't see him coming here as other teams could give soooo much more.


Could he fit in OKC? They could offer a metric f*ck ton of picks and probably a couple of nice young players. Salary matching would be difficult but I'd guess right off the bat iShart and Caruso are in the deal.

That's already two useful role players the Bucks could keep or flip. They'd have to come up with another 20 million.

Assume the core is Shai/Williams/Chet, and they are willing to deal anything else, within reason.

Didn't quite understand the 20 million reference. According to the spotrac trade machine, Giannis for hHrtenstein and Caruso straight up works salary wise (or for that matter, eg, Dort, Caruso and Wiggins).

I thought that there might be a salary gap between iShart and Caruso and Giannis

Wow. Those two and 5 picks
Image
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,530
And1: 10,429
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#173 » by cgmw » Sun Aug 3, 2025 4:40 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Plenty of chatter actually. We've been discussing him for weeks.

The idea of him is great. The reality never lives up to the the dream.

Brogdon always injured.

Shamet isn't a PG. If we bring him back, Clarkson or Deuce get the job.

Who the is there?

Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet


Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league? :o Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.

Shamet for the win?

Simmons is the most talented of that bunch unless there’s another buyout coming. Still, I’d be worried that the team would take a step back just having him on the roster period. I guess I’m wondering if that feeling is universal or whether some fans still want him.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,496
And1: 5,671
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#174 » by spree2kawhi » Sun Aug 3, 2025 6:10 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Plenty of chatter actually. We've been discussing him for weeks.

The idea of him is great. The reality never lives up to the the dream.

Brogdon always injured.

Shamet isn't a PG. If we bring him back, Clarkson or Deuce get the job.

Who the is there?

Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet


Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league? :o Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.

Shamet for the win?

None of them are in the league, that’s my point. Achiuwa might sign in Greece soon - imo we should try to keep him instead.
VirginiaKnickFan
RealGM
Posts: 12,569
And1: 3,503
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: Virginia

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#175 » by VirginiaKnickFan » Sun Aug 3, 2025 6:24 pm

RHODEY wrote:
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
RHODEY wrote:


"NBA Every Day" YouTube channel with an amazing 59 subscribers! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Right because clout = quality :nod:


It's actually more about Knicks = clicks :nod:
B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,530
And1: 6,372
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#176 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Sun Aug 3, 2025 6:43 pm

cgmw wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet


Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league? :o Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.

Shamet for the win?

Simmons is the most talented of that bunch unless there’s another buyout coming. Still, I’d be worried that the team would take a step back just having him on the roster period. I guess I’m wondering if that feeling is universal or whether some fans still want him.

I'd take the punt. Worst outcome is that he's unplayable, sulks and Mike Brown has to ban him from the locker room. But that would all be entertaining.

Otoh, the Knicks could play line-ups with him, Mitch, Josh and Bridges and take us all back to the days of basketball a century ago with quarters rarely with double digit points on either side. I'd pay money to live through that.
B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,530
And1: 6,372
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#177 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Sun Aug 3, 2025 6:45 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Could he fit in OKC? They could offer a metric f*ck ton of picks and probably a couple of nice young players. Salary matching would be difficult but I'd guess right off the bat iShart and Caruso are in the deal.

That's already two useful role players the Bucks could keep or flip. They'd have to come up with another 20 million.

Assume the core is Shai/Williams/Chet, and they are willing to deal anything else, within reason.

Didn't quite understand the 20 million reference. According to the spotrac trade machine, Giannis for hHrtenstein and Caruso straight up works salary wise (or for that matter, eg, Dort, Caruso and Wiggins).

I thought that there might be a salary gap between iShart and Caruso and Giannis

Wow. Those two and 5 picks

No. They're both under the first apron, so old-school trades work. The difference in salaries (combined) is smthg like 7m and that's less than 20% of whatever Giannis makes ( idk, 55m?).

The Knicks would have to send out more salary than Giannis's, so quite a different deal. But the Knicks could send OG and Josh Hart, for example - that works money-wise. Also gives the Knicks another 5m for recruiting, although have to recruit another player (Not talking about whether MIL would have any basketball motivation to make such a trade. I mean I guess they could ship at least OG on for decent draft assets. I'm really not convinced what Hart's retail value is ... but ... mkay.)

KAT
GIannis
Bridges
Deuce or Clarkson
Brunson
----
Mitch / Huk
Simmons (let's say, just for the sake of argument - mebbe Giannis can teach him Giannis-ball) / Yabu
Pac / Shamet(? hypothetically) / McCullars
Clarkson or Deuce
Kolek

But you could go a little up market from vet mins for Shamet/Simmons. Or could sign a 15th player with a vet min. Or try to figure out something better as a PG back-up strategy and invest some of your 2.6m or w/e extra in that.

[/besart]
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 17,894
And1: 15,875
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
   

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#178 » by BKlutch » Sun Aug 3, 2025 7:39 pm

Read on Twitter


Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.
.

____________________
____________________


:basketball: * We have a Brunson Burner™ * :basketball:
* Make the Knicks Champs Again *
:basketball: ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** :basketball:
____________________
____________________

.
.
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,518
And1: 18,953
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#179 » by KnicksGadfly » Sun Aug 3, 2025 7:56 pm

BKlutch wrote:
Read on Twitter


Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.


That's not news though?
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 80,990
And1: 94,432
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#180 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Aug 3, 2025 8:13 pm

Damn. Fiddler On The Goof wasn't impressed with Brunson
Image

Return to New York Knicks