BKlutch wrote:
Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.
"If he can get the ball to RJ and Mitch, he might be worth it."




Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
BKlutch wrote:
Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:RHODEY wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
"NBA Every Day" YouTube channel with an amazing 59 subscribers!![]()
![]()
Right because clout = quality
It's actually more about Knicks = clicks
8516knicks wrote:BKlutch wrote:
Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.
"If he can get the ball to RJ and Mitch, he might be worth it."![]()
![]()
![]()
RHODEY wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:RHODEY wrote:Right because clout = quality
It's actually more about Knicks = clicks
Channels with large following also do that....I thought it was interesting because people are acting like we are %100 locked into Bridges. Despite his tiny following this guy is one of few to present a scenario where Giannis could still be in play.
RHODEY wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:RHODEY wrote:Right because clout = quality
It's actually more about Knicks = clicks
Channels with large following also do that....I thought it was interesting because people are acting like we are %100 locked into Bridges. Despite his tiny following this guy is one of few to present a scenario where Giannis could still be in play.
KnicksGadfly wrote:BKlutch wrote:
Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.
That's not news though?
spree2kawhi wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet
Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league?Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.
Shamet for the win?
None of them are in the league, that’s my point. Achiuwa might sign in Greece soon - imo we should try to keep him instead.
spree2kawhi wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Lonnie Walker, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Precious Achiuwa, Shamet
Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league?Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.
Shamet for the win?
None of them are in the league, that’s my point. Achiuwa might sign in Greece soon - imo we should try to keep him instead.
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:RHODEY wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
It's actually more about Knicks = clicks
Channels with large following also do that....I thought it was interesting because people are acting like we are %100 locked into Bridges. Despite his tiny following this guy is one of few to present a scenario where Giannis could still be in play.
Sure anything is possible, it's just not very probable in my opinion. Unless he strictly demanded a trade to the NY Knicks, which I doubt, why wouldn't the Bucks shop him around the league for a best deal in their favor, with a combination of picks and players.
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:RHODEY wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
It's actually more about Knicks = clicks
Channels with large following also do that....I thought it was interesting because people are acting like we are %100 locked into Bridges. Despite his tiny following this guy is one of few to present a scenario where Giannis could still be in play.
BKlutch wrote:
Here we go - proof from 3 years ago that Knicks fans were very skeptical that Brunson would be what he is today.
Jalen Bluntson wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:RHODEY wrote:
Channels with large following also do that....I thought it was interesting because people are acting like we are %100 locked into Bridges. Despite his tiny following this guy is one of few to present a scenario where Giannis could still be in play.
Sure anything is possible, it's just not very probable in my opinion. Unless he strictly demanded a trade to the NY Knicks, which I doubt, why wouldn't the Bucks shop him around the league for a best deal in their favor, with a combination of picks and players.
They would. NYK has nothing that makes sense for MIL. OKC could beat anything we offer without blinking. He can't demand his way anywhere with multiple years left on his deal and he doesn't have a NTC. MIL would be in full rebuild.
Jalen Bluntson wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Precious isn't coming back. We don't need him. I mentioned Shamet. We technically don't need him either. Rondae? He's still in the league?Lonnie is overseas. He's been bounced around so much I don't know what his deal is.
Shamet for the win?
None of them are in the league, that’s my point. Achiuwa might sign in Greece soon - imo we should try to keep him instead.
Why? We just signed his replacement. We only have one vet mini to spend. Hope he likes souvlaki.
WaltFrazier wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:None of them are in the league, that’s my point. Achiuwa might sign in Greece soon - imo we should try to keep him instead.
Why? We just signed his replacement. We only have one vet mini to spend. Hope he likes souvlaki.
I read somewhere Precious could sign with Miami, his first team. It was just speculation though I think. Hope he lands somewhere in the NBA.
I know we have Yabusele now but Precious still would be a good depth piece at 4-5, for defense especially
BKlutch wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Why? We just signed his replacement. We only have one vet mini to spend. Hope he likes souvlaki.
I read somewhere Precious could sign with Miami, his first team. It was just speculation though I think. Hope he lands somewhere in the NBA.
I know we have Yabusele now but Precious still would be a good depth piece at 4-5, for defense especially
Either this year or next, Yabusele is going to do things that Lebron will no longer be capable of. Whether our team most needs another 4-5 or whether we need a PG is not clear.
BKlutch wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Why? We just signed his replacement. We only have one vet mini to spend. Hope he likes souvlaki.
I read somewhere Precious could sign with Miami, his first team. It was just speculation though I think. Hope he lands somewhere in the NBA.
I know we have Yabusele now but Precious still would be a good depth piece at 4-5, for defense especially
Either this year or next, Yabusele is going to do things that Lebron will no longer be capable of. Whether our team most needs another 4-5 or whether we need a PG is not clear.
RHODEY wrote:BKlutch wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:I read somewhere Precious could sign with Miami, his first team. It was just speculation though I think. Hope he lands somewhere in the NBA.
I know we have Yabusele now but Precious still would be a good depth piece at 4-5, for defense especially
Either this year or next, Yabusele is going to do things that Lebron will no longer be capable of. Whether our team most needs another 4-5 or whether we need a PG is not clear.
It's pretty clear to me that we need another playmaker, Brunson is the only playable one we have.
GONYK wrote:RHODEY wrote:BKlutch wrote:Either this year or next, Yabusele is going to do things that Lebron will no longer be capable of. Whether our team most needs another 4-5 or whether we need a PG is not clear.
It's pretty clear to me that we need another playmaker, Brunson is the only playable one we have.
Clarkson is a second playmaker
RHODEY wrote:GONYK wrote:RHODEY wrote:
It's pretty clear to me that we need another playmaker, Brunson is the only playable one we have.
Clarkson is a second playmaker
I mean he's underated in that category, but he's by no means a pure playmaker...and we need that behind Brunson.