Twinkie defense wrote:I'm also curious, in the unlikely situation that Kuminga takes his $7.9 mil qualifying offer, what effect does that have on the Warriors cap situation?
If Kuminga signs the qualifying offer, the Warriors could stay under the 1st apron. They will have lost salary to trade, limiting themselves to small trades or needing to trade Draymond or Butler.
With two vet minimums signed, they would have space for two more players to split roughly $12M of the NTMLE ($14.1M). The TPMLE is $5.685M, less than half of that. Right now, I am hard-pressed to think of anyone who deserves more than the vet minimum than Horford. The only player they had a shot who I thought was worth it was Beal, and he was going to the Clippers even if the Warriors would have doubled the Clippers' offer of $5.354M.
The problem with so many vet minimums is you can no longer cobble together several in a trade if you're trying to salary match a deal. This is a concern with Kuminga's potential S&T. A team is allowed to only include one vet minimum in a trade. You also have to deal with any FA who signs for one season, as they would have the right of trade refusal.
If the Warriors had been able to stay under the 1st apron, they could have split up portions of the NTMLE ($14.1M), the Bi-Annual ($5.135M), and the use of the SloMo TPE ($8.8M). The use of any one of those three hard caps a team at the first apron. But since they could be for more than the vet minimum, they could have been aggregated together in a trade later on.
It would have been interesting, getting both Beal and Horford, but that ship has sailed. Kuminga's free agency has gummed up the works. And there is plenty of blame to go all around. Kuminga. His agent. Lacob. Kerr. The 2023 (latest) CBA.