23artest23 wrote:Vegeta10176 wrote:Pickled Prunes wrote:The obvious move for a HOF coach.
Reporters should avoid writing their opinions in a story. It was not a surprising run... or at least, I wasn't surprised. They won the East in my bracket, largely because of their coach and the depth of talent he had to work with. (And no, I'm not a Pacers homer; I live on the West coast. And no, I don't care what Vegas has to say about it; their job is predicting how people will bet, not necessarily predicting the eventual outcome.)
Ppl will bet on what they expect.. If you expected the pacers to win why didn't you put large bets on them could of made some good money until the finals.. If they had beaten okc would you have been surprised? The point here is if ppl expected the knicks to win and thus so much so they backed them into a favourite cause that how it works if ppl were putting more money on the pacers the pacers would start favourite.. The point is though if what happened was what was not expected by most people it is known as a surprise.. I was surprised the pacers went 7 against OKC.. I will not be surprised if the pacers never make the nba finals with this current iteration and I would be surprised if the pacers won a championship without getting a player better than haliburton..
It wasn't much of a surprise to Pacer fans and yes, I did bet it. We knew the team had that ability. The surprise was to everyone else because they weren't paying attention.
Well, I'm not a Pacers fan and I don't bet on anything... nothing is a sure thing. If Haliburton didn't get hurt, a lot of people might have lost their shirt in the Finals... but yes, I would have made a killing if I were a betting man.
There are little surprises every playoffs, but for a reporter to claim that four-seed, 50-win team that finished the season hot, was a surprise just because
they didn't expect it, is pretty sloppy writing. I called it, 23artest23 called it, and anyone that didn't see it as a possibility simply wasn't paying attention.